Appeals Court Overturns Sales Ban on Samsung Galaxy Nexus

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Oct 11, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Prior to Apple's patent trial win over Samsung, the company was awarded an injunction by Judge Lucy Koh barring U.S. sales of the Samsung Galaxy Nexus phone. As noted by The Next Web, a federal appeals court today reversed the ban on the grounds that Apple would not be sufficiently harmed by the alleged infringement.

    [​IMG]
    The appeals court found that the feature was indeed not integral to the success of the Galaxy Nexus, ruling that the lower court "abused its discretion" in issuing the original injunction. The Next Web notes:
    The appeals court, however, disagreed with Koh's ruling that Apple had shown adequate threat of irreparable harm.

    Samsung and Google developed a software workaround or the patent in question and deployed it shortly after the injunction went into effect. With the ban now lifted, the workaround appears to no longer be necessary. The full order [PDF] is available from the U.S. Courts website.

    Update 11:51 AM: Our initial report seems to have generated some confusion over the exact rationale for the appeals court's decision to overturn the injunction. The appeals court ruled that Apple did not sufficiently show that sales of the Galaxy Nexus benefited from the inclusion of the unified search feature that is the subject of the patent. Given that view, the lower court was ruled to have overstepped its bounds in issuing the injunction on the belief that Apple would be caused irreparable harm by allowing sales of the Galaxy Nexus to continue.
    The appeals court's decision was not based upon Samsung's earlier argument that sales of the Galaxy Nexus had been so "minuscule" as to not be a threat to Apple. We have also removed a quote from The Next Web's report that when taken out of context suggests that this was at least a partial reason for the overturning of the injunction.

    Article Link: Appeals Court Overturns Sales Ban on Samsung Galaxy Nexus
     
  2. macrumors 68040

    Gasu E.

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    Not far from Boston, MA.
    #2
    "Nobody wants our product; therefore, a ban is unnecessary."
     
  3. macrumors 65816

    SockRolid

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Location:
    Almost Rock Solid
    #3
    Yeah, it's alright. Let the kiddies have their fun.
     
  4. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    #4
    eh, who cares really? I think it was a big win that they got the injunction in the first place, but having it reversed is not a big deal and probably won't get much news coverage anyway.
     
  5. macrumors Pentium

    KnightWRX

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    #5
    Hum, this is wrong. The injunction was granted in another lawsuit not related to Apple's current win in their original suit. And also, it was granted before the August trial, back in June, so not exactly "In the aftermath".
     
  6. macrumors 6502

    k1121j

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    #6
    What

    its agianst the law but its ok cause no one will buy them so does that mean it they sell a lot of them they can revisit?
     
  7. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #7
    So it's a big deal when Apple "wins" - but when that win is overturned - who cares? Interesting.
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    striker33

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    #8
    So basically, it doesnt matter if you steal someone else's property, as long as you are making very little money from it.

    Makes sense.
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    #9
    I'll never understand how a court of law can make a decision only for the appeals court to change that decision.

    Shouldn't the original judge now be fired or something? What makes the appeal court more correct than the original court?
     
  10. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #10
    No that's not at all what the overturn is about. Just because MR put in the comment about sales in the article doesn't mean it had anything at all to do with the reversal.
     
  11. macrumors 6502

    TrentS

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2011
    Location:
    Overland Park, Kansas
    #11
    What?!!

    Too bad if your sales are in the dumps. Your product still should be banned if it is not fully legal, patent-wise. Samsung should just get out of the tech business and start building toilets or something.

    :) :) :)
     
  12. macrumors Pentium

    KnightWRX

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    #12
    What's against the law ? There has been no verdict in the lawsuit in which the Galaxy Nexus is listed.

    ----------

    Makes sense since no one was found guilty of infringement in this lawsuit. The MacRumors story is confused.
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    bad03xtreme

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Location:
    Northern, VA
    #13
    I am confused, this phone has continued to be for sale on Verizon's website. It's actually on sale for $49.99 now?? :confused:
     
  14. macrumors Pentium

    KnightWRX

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    #14
    Appeals are usually heard by a panel of 3 judges.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    #15
    Why isn't this phone selling?

    This phone barely scratched the surface, it only counts for less than 0.5% of the smart phone market, to be honest I am surprised.

    Of all the bloatware-loaded Samsung (and other vendors) phones, Nexus provides 'pure' Android experience, which according to many is the best experience. The phone comes with 'just right' mid-level specs (for example, HSPA+ rather than LTE, but still fast) and is as universal as it gets (it works seemlessly with AT&T and T-Mobile). and a KILLER price of $350 unlocked, free on contract. Why did it not sell?

    I think Samsung themsleves did it out of some sort of a previous deal or obligation, they wanted it to fail.
     
  16. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    #16
    I'm happy Apple have not succeeded at this.

    Samsung and Google have a great product and we all deserve the choice to buy it if we want.

    Competition is great. My money is going on Samsung for my next phone. 4 years on iOS has been disappointing to say the least.
     
  17. macrumors Pentium

    KnightWRX

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    #17
    Apple wouldn't be able to sell iPhones then either. Klausner patent's on Visual Voice mail caused them grief, the September 14th ITC decision ruled that they need to pay for FRAND patents to Samsung because patent exhaustion doesn't come into play, etc..

    In these industries, no one is white, everyone infringes on someone else's patents, just by the sheer number of patents covering such a wide breadth of technology out there.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    #18
    Kind of makes me think that one the last day, two extra judges should sit in on a case, then.

    I'm more worried about the fact the first judgement was wrong!
     
  19. macrumors 65816

    Destroysall

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Location:
    United States
    #19
    You're probably looking at the Nexus S. The Nexus is only available through the Google Play Store.
     
  20. macrumors 68030

    Krazy Bill

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    #20
    Being "correct" has nothing to do with it since that's subjective at best. Judges are only human and pass down "opinions".

    I for one am glad the U.S. has an appeals process.
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    #21
    ok bye
     
  22. macrumors 603

    ChazUK

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Location:
    Essex (UK)
    #22
    The original injunction was stopped pending this appeal from what I remember.
     
  23. macrumors 68040

    the8thark

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    #23
    I agree. This is wrong. Care to have the original article here fixed?
     
  24. macrumors 603

    ChazUK

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Location:
    Essex (UK)
    #24
    Its also sold by Verizon. The Nexus S is no longer on sale I believe.
     
  25. macrumors 65816

    striker33

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    #25
    When the Nexus first got released, it was the best Android phone.

    However, Samsung have significantly improved their UI, beyond what a 'pure' google handset would offer. Its a lot more user friendly (mostly copied from Apple), whilst retaining the customisation of Android.

    I'd actually struggle to go back to any non Touchwiz android device now. They're just so much more fluid and appealing compared to stock android.

    Plus theres not a single crappy software button in sight. Real buttons ftw.
     

Share This Page