Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,240
39,048



It is approaching five years since Apple began shipping the Thunderbolt Display in September 2011, leading many to wonder when the monitor will receive a long-anticipated update, if ever.

Apple could have refreshed the Thunderbolt Display with USB 3.0, Thunderbolt 2 and a tapered iMac-style design as early as 2013, but it has chosen not to do that. The company continues to sell the 2011 27" model with USB 2.0 and first-generation Thunderbolt ports for $999.

So, what has been the holdup? The answer likely lies in supply chain considerations and connectivity.

thunderbolt_display_elcap_roundup_header.jpg


4K Thunderbolt Display

Many have been long hoping that Apple would release a 4K Thunderbolt Display, considering that the latest Macs, and most models refreshed since late 2013, can be used with at least one 4K display.

But, typically, standalone Apple displays have shared the same screens as iMacs. Since Apple skipped over a 4K 27" iMac, Apple would have to source a separate screen to release a 4K Thunderbolt Display, and the product may be too niche for that to be worthwhile.

Meanwhile, with Thunderbolt 3 rolling out this year, it seems unlikely that Apple will bother with a refreshed non-4K Thunderbolt Display in the interim. So, as time goes on, the more likely possibility is that Apple will eventually release a much improved 5K Thunderbolt Display.

5K Thunderbolt Display

5K displays have an incredible 14.7 million pixels, resulting in sharper and crisper images, but they remain expensive. 5K models from Dell and HP retail for between $1,649 and $1,999, while Apple's all-in-one 5K iMac starts at $1,799, but cannot be used in target display mode.

Apple already sells a 27" Retina 5K iMac, and its screen could be the basis for a corresponding 5K Thunderbolt Display. The display could share the same 5,120×2,880 resolution, USB Type-C ports for connecting Thunderbolt 3 peripherals and possibly an ultra-thin design like the newest iMacs. But no current Macs could drive such a 5K display over a single cable.

Apple won't release the first Macs with Intel's new Skylake chips and Thunderbolt 3 support until later in 2016, and only those models will be able to drive a 5K display at 60Hz over one cable. While that makes a 5K Thunderbolt Display a possibility in 2016, Apple has good reason to wait until at least 2017.

Intel's Skylake processors for Mac notebooks, launching in early 2016, and Kaby Lake processors, expected to launch in the first half of 2017, will not be able to drive a 5K Thunderbolt Display over Single-Stream Transport (SST). The underlying issue is that both processor lineups lack support for DisplayPort 1.3.

Instead, the display would sync two channels over Multi-Stream Transport (MST), which can cause some performance issues. That means Apple may wait until at least Cannon Lake chipset (which promise SST 5K support) in the second half of 2017, before releasing a 5K Thunderbolt Display.

Because external displays are a relatively small market for Apple, it's possible Apple never plans to introduce an updated Thunderbolt Display. If a new model is in the company's plans, Apple will likely wait to introduce a 5K display until 2017 when most Macs can easily support it in order to maximize supply chain efficiency.

If you are interested in exploring third-party 4K displays, read our 4K and 5K Display Buyer's Guide for Macs.

Article Link: Where Is Apple's 5K Thunderbolt Display?
 
Really, no DisplayPort 1.3 or 5K SST support until 2017? Seems a little ridiculous, but luckily I'm quite happy with my 27" LED Cinema Display.
 
I don't see the point in spending a fortune on a 5k display. For the money, I'd rather have a 4k screen and a video card that would really take advantage of it (980 Ti).

Having all those pixels and computer hardware that chokes just trying to show a simple GUI seems silly to me.
 
If Apple does eventually introduce a 5K display with USB Type-C, I just hope they offer an adapter to use two Thunderbolt 2 ports on my Mac Pro. I think Apple should introduce a 4K and 5K display lineup. Additionally, offer an adapter for the iMac 5K using two Thunderbolt 2 ports in Target Display Mode.

Apple loves adapters now anyway!
 
But, typically, standalone Apple displays have shared the same screens as iMacs. Since Apple skipped over a 4K iMac, Apple would have to source a separate screen to release a 4K Thunderbolt Display, and the product may be too niche for that to be worthwhile.

Why is MR posting outdated information? Apple skipped over a 4K iMac?

Really?
 
I don't think that Apple will ship a 4K/5K until almost all laptops and the Mac mini can drive them. The 'High End' Apple display has traditionally been intended to Mac Tower, the Mac Pro and the Power G3/4/5 before. Since the Intel transition the Mac Pro has become more 'Pro' and the iMac has become the Pro Mac for many many users. The market for external displays for Macs has become more about laptops not desktops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kingmoak and Gudi
I couldn't wait anymore, for the price of one of these old monitors I bought two Dell 27" 4k monitors.
What Mac are you running those Dells off? a new Mac Pro

Personally I would have probably brought a Dell over an Apple display as I generally prefer matte over glossy glass.

A year or so ago I was in an Apple Store and they had a 4K Matte display (Panasonic ?) attracted to a new Mac Pro next to a Mac mini with an Apple Display, the non Apple display looked far better in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernuli
A 4K 27" iMac. Post has been fixed.

Thanks for that. This is just me really hoping one day that Apple will one day expand the display lineup with a smaller 4K 21.5" TBD. I miss the days when Apple had multiple Cinema Display size offerings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
It is a product that is not profitable to Apple. People have iMacs or other options for displays so... there is no rush in a market already flooded with options, it is more like an accessory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: melendezest
This assumes that we're completely dependant upon Intel implementing DisplayPort 1.3. I'm hoping we're not.

As far as I recall, the incoming generation of NVidia / AMD discreet GPU's should support it, which would mean the refreshed pro line could support it.

This would at the very least enable the pro gear to connect - and maybe MST for the rest?

The trickier issue imo is that thunderbolt 3 doesn't support DisplayPort 1.3. I think that just makes life confusing!
 
  • Like
Reactions: flottenheimer
Where is Apple's 5K Thunderbolt Display?
It comes with a CPU/GPU, etc.. it's an iMac...

5K iMac cannot be used in target display mode, so it can't be an external display for my MacBook Pro.

5K iMac seems like a great deal. A whole desktop computer for $150 more than Dell's 5K monitor, but it doesn't fill the 5K Thunderbolt Display void (yet).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.