Apple Acquitted in Mexican 'iPhone' Naming Lawsuit

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jun 5, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    The Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) has resolved the dispute between Apple and Mexican telecommunications company iFone over the rights to the phonetic name "iPhone", acquitting Apple of any wrongdoing, reports El Universal [Google Translate].

    [​IMG]
    The IMPI found that the "iPhone" trademark can only be infringed by iFone's fellow telecommunications companies. Because Apple is a hardware company and does not own a wireless network, it is not technically infringing the trademark.

    Instead, the IMPI will fine Mexican telecommunications companies Telcel, Iusacell and Movistar and require them to remove "iPhone" advertising and branding from its stores within 15 days. Apple will still be allowed to sell iPhones, however.

    Apple has been fighting this case since 2009, losing the court case in November 2012 and then losing an appeal in March 2013.

    Article Link: Apple Acquitted in Mexican 'iPhone' Naming Lawsuit
     
  2. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    #2
    This guys will be millionaires soon

    Apple will have to pay these guys lot of money for their brand. Promoting the iPhone brand for operators is a must. Apple can´t let this happen.
     
  3. apparatchik, Jun 5, 2014
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2014

    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    #3
    Here is a working link with the article in english:

    http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/in-en...s-trademark-lawsuit-against-apple--89698.html

    As I recall from a recent article, Mexico is the seventh market by size in iPhone sales, there will probably be a few new rich bastards around.
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Location:
    Australia
    #4
    Competitors can't advertise the same third party product due to a trademark? That is one messed up legal system.
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    #5
    No, it is not. It is a massive protection against trademark trolls. In Mexico you have to prove that you are actively using a name and the trademark will only be granted in the segments where it is relevant to your usage.

    Those guys had a company running under that name 5 years before the first iPhone.

    Apple tried to fill a trademark for that segment, which was rejected. They sued the iFone trademark holders and lost.

    If anyones is Apple's fault, for thinking the world works just as the US. I'm pretty sure in the US they would be able to get the trademark easily, thanks in part to lobbying, and for the bad reputation of patent/trademark trolls. Not in Mexico tho, there aren't as many, and trademarks usually are hold by their lawful owners and operators.

    Why would anyone hold a name such as iFone is anyones guess. It doesn't mean a thing in spanish, nor in english. But the law is the law, and everyone has to abide to it... yes.... even in Mexico.


    EDIT: The company seems to sell software for call centers. Make sense since Phone is phonetically identical to Fone in spanish.
     
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    #6
    Karma, right there!, Apple sued first a little company and end up loosing big time, iPhone market here is pretty decent and not being able to promote it through third party channels which is about the only option cause there are no official Apple Store's around is going to make some damage.
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    #7

    Not really, even though it'd sound that way the Mexican law is divided in specific segments, and they are not consequent and depending each other.
    There are a lot of international companies, not just from USA, and it has to be like this in order to avoid legal trademark infringements such as this one.
    What really happened is Apple assumed it could win, offering money to buy the trademark, but ifone company didn't want it to sell...

    Why ifone name is beyond me....
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    CarlosQG

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2012
    #8
    Well that sucks, guess we'll be seeing and hearing ads that go "Apple's new phone" instead "the new iPhone 6". Who are these iFone guys anyway...
     
  9. macrumors 6502

    OtherJesus

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    Location:
    Bay Area, California
    #9
    Make some damage? You mean like people fighting over the new iPhone?
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Location:
    mexico
    #10
    U.S media outlets are making a big deal out of it, and the reality is that all carriers in mexico make their ads without the word iPhone on them just the device with the Apple logo. people aren't stupid

    ----------

    You are wrong there is an apple store in mexico called the apple online store www.apple.com.mx

    and the unofficial stores you mention are about as official as they get because they are premium resellers, they operate under third parties but have every apple permission to sell their products. and there are countless outlets where the product is sold, best buy, premium reseller retailers, carriers etc. this is nothing

    ----------

    wrong!

    fone isn't the same as phone phonetically. in Spanish it should be pronounced PHO-NEH. but we are so accustomed to english pronunciation because of our influence by the gringos that we inadvertently pronounce the same as iPhone. for example people in Spain say e-pohd (for the iPod) we say iPod just as in an english speaker. someone should take a note of this because if you can prove it doesn't sound the same phonetically the trademark can pass and it seems someone isn't doing their job properly.
     
  11. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    #11
    Apple did the right thing here. I'm proud of them for fighting the good fight even in Mexico.
     
  12. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
  13. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    #13

    Dude I too love Apple but I'm not that blind, how's trying to screw a company, (which operates 5 years before even the first iPhone )to avoid paying royalties a good fight?.
    Just because they are launching a product doesn't mean we all how to bow to them, in the end they lost more than they can chew.

    ----------

    They started it in the first place, this little company didn't even want to go to the courts, they offered them to pay a small amount for royalties.

    ----------

     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    #14
    This is where I feel like Apple is being a douche but the courts surely should rules they aren't spelled the same and aren't in the same business so everyone gets to just operate as normal. It doesn't make sense that anyone is in the wrong here. I'm sure the ifone brand will die over time as the company realises it's easier to call themselves something else than deal with the confusion.

    If it was spelt the same It would be totally different and Apple would not have a leg to stand on.
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Location:
    mexico
    #15
    you can't be that of an idiot. i mean i've heard people from other countries speak have you?
     
  16. apollo1444, Jun 6, 2014
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2014

    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Location:
    mexico
    #16
    you are exaggerating beyond the imaginable...I always buy my phones from the Apple Store because i hate contracts and locked phones, there are plenty of people like myself who travel to the U.S in the holidays and like to pop in a T-Mobile sim instead of paying those ludicrous roaming prices. my latest iPhone is a golden 5S which was carrier locked because for the first time ever, i signed with the devil on a contract, i don't have issues with my carrier but i hated the fact that this iPhone was slaved by the devil, so i found out chronic unlocks, now unlocks telcel iphones and i bought one and it worked, a few days later i got a confirmation email so i restored my iPhone and got the unlock message, poped in a iusacell sim and it worked (btw chronic unlocks now offers unlock for telcel)

    it doesn't cost a fortune it costs almost the same as the U.S multiply $649 x 12.89 x 1.16 (iva) = $9673 MXN which is $1000 mxn less than the apple price in the mexican store $10,599

    1000 pesos is hardly a fortune buddy, and well, the iPhone is a prestigious device, just as their line of iPads and computers, it isn't a flip phone or an android phone so don't make it sound like it is impossible for people, there are people who can afford it in all parts of the planet.

    I forgot to mention that premium resellers don't charge their own prices for apple products, its the same official apple price from the mx store
     
  17. macrumors G3

    charlituna

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #17
    Or it isn't a huge deal. People know what "we sell Apple phones" with a photo of the phones means even if the word iPhone is not on it.

    What is even bigger and more important is that a governing body recognized that a trademark for a cell service etc isn't the same as one for a piece of hardware that may or may not run on that service. Trademarks are supposed to be that specific but sometimes courts etc allow more generic interpretations that negate trademarks. Nice to see that not happen.

    ----------

    No, Apple filed for a trademark for a different segment, which is legit, and was sued. They were acquitted because the governing group recognized that they aren't doing what iFone is and thus there is no conflict other than the actual name which in Spanish might be spelled iFone. Thus to appease this iFone company resellers can't have that work on any posters etc. Not really a huge deal since Mexicans aren't morons and they will understand what a poster that says Apple with an iPhone on it means.

    ----------

    did you read the article. Any of the articles. about how Apple was sued. This iFone company was the aggressor, likely trying to get a few bucks out of a bigger company etc.
     
  18. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    #18

    Apple sued first, in 2009...... Plus the company was operational long before the first iPhone launched.
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #19
    Seems they are trying to associate iFone with iPhone in advertising as seen with the picture. But try to use a picture of iPhone at extreme angles perhaps to avoid the courts saying its not recognizable as a trademark. Questionable at best.
     
  20. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2013
    #20
    Ridiculous!

    That means, if you're in Mexico, you can use Cixco, Mycrosoft or Inn-tel names for your electronic insurance plans because Cisco, Microsoft or Intel doesn't have that line of business. Why bother to figure out a name for your company while you can just use someone else's famous name out there and tweak a bit to make it different but sound the same. Mex IP agency is a corrupt group.

    ----------

     
  21. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    #21
    Apple will find their way out of this victorious. They’ve got experience dating back to Apple Computer versus Apple Corps. (Apple versus The Beatles).
     
  22. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2014
    Location:
    Portland
    #22
    Relájese. Él sólo estaba siendo sarcástico. Sin ánimo de ofender. ;)
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    GoodWatch

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Location:
    Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    #23
    Wow! Apple = always right. Others = always wrong.
     
  24. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    #24
     
  25. paleriderc2d, Jun 6, 2014
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2014

    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    #25
    Apple Acquitted in Mexican 'iPhone' Naming Lawsuit


    It was said in jest.

    Are you that sensitive?
     

Share This Page