Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

HobeSoundDarryl

macrumors G5
Yes, I look at $440 and see a mountain to be climbed to get a double. That's not just $700 again but way above an all-time record.

Then, I look at something like Facebook when it was at $18 and see the very same upside (double) opportunity if it can make it to just $36.

That doesn’t make Facebook a better company than Apple, or Facebook products(?) better products than Apple products. It just illustrates that investing in stock is entirely disconnected from the usual spin, koolaid, etc that flies around here. AAPL could halve itself from here but Apple the company will be no worse off (just not as valuable on paper as some other companies). So what? Why care about executive bragging rights?

What we're usually caring about is how great the next Mac or iDevice is going to be. And they will still arrive... whether AAPL is at $100 or $1000 per share next week, near year or 10 years from now.
 

MTL18

macrumors regular
Jan 25, 2013
205
72
Yes, I look at $440 and see a mountain to be climbed to get a double. That's not just $700 again but way above an all-time record.

Then, I look at something like Facebook when it was at $18 and see the very same upside (double) opportunity if it can make it to just $36.

That doesn’t make Facebook a better company than Apple, or Facebook products(?) better products than Apple products. It just illustrates that investing in stock is entirely disconnected from the usual spin, koolaid, etc that flies around here. AAPL could halve itself from here but Apple the company will be no worse off (just not as valuable on paper as some other companies). So what? Why care about executive bragging rights?

What we're usually caring about is how great the next Mac or iDevice is going to be. And they will still arrive... whether AAPL is at $100 or $1000 per share next week, near year or 10 years from now.

What you are forgetting is that investing in stocks that make no money and are pumped up on future earnings potential has incredible risk. You can double your money in a month, and you can half it at the same time.

The Netflix ride is a great example: 50 ---> 300 ---> 50 ---> 170 today (up 70 dollars in 2 days).

Growth stocks have tremendous risk. The beauty of AAPL is that it has growth stock potential (a la 2012), but offers the support of a blue-chip (tons of cash in the bank, lots of revenue/profit, dividend).

I would never recommend that someone invest in a company like FB or NFLX without monitoring their account daily. Risk vs. Reward. There is not a lot of risk in AAPL over the next 24 months. FB or NFLX could be worthless by then.
 

blackhand1001

macrumors 68030
Jan 6, 2009
2,599
33
The same arguments were made for the iPhone and iPad. Too expensive, market dominated by RIM, fad, not needed, no function, microsoft tried and failed this....yada yada yada.

Release a product that is the next leap in the user experience and it will sell. Growth does not have to turn out a mountain of money on day 1, it simply has to be a revenue stream that didn't exist before and has potential. Do you think Neflix or AMZN are actually priced according to sales? Growth investors are excited at their potential, so money is flooding into them, even though they make no money. Same with FB and LinkedIn.

No the markets for smartphones and tablets was not saturated at all. The difference is that the market for televisions is.
 

MyMacintosh

macrumors 6502a
Aug 10, 2012
532
878
Agree. Last week it was me and 520 puts.

Although I can see why a trading newbie could not possibly see how you can turn $500-1000 into $6-7000 in a few days. Hint. It's true. But you can lose it all too.

Let's just say the odds are a million times better than the lottery.

Lol niiiice. But yeah I usually don't play earnings but I love trading. Today AAPL puts have treated me well. I'm also swinging HAL.
 

DaveN

macrumors 6502a
May 1, 2010
905
756
Of those three - only one would be remotely equivalent - Yahoo. And Yahoo became the Yahoo of today because of Google.

Until someone comes along with a better search/ad model than Google - I'd say Google's revenue stream is well protected.

Duckduckgo.com

For people who don't trust google monitoring their every move.
 

jlasoon

macrumors 6502a
Jun 1, 2006
505
627
Orlando, FL
To have a comfortable margin of safety, using Graham's philosophy, they'd have to be trading somewhere between $230 and $270 per share (10-25% margin of safety) since the Graham Number is the theoretical absolute MAXIMUM one should pay.... but not the ideal bargain with a sensible margin of safety to insulate one's self from potential of catastrophic loss.

I've said it for quite some time,

support at $450,

followed by $175
 

Larry-K

macrumors 68000
Jun 28, 2011
1,888
2,340
My friend who bought at $700 is only down $260 a share. Good thing she had a financial adviser.
 

NedBookPro

macrumors 6502
Feb 13, 2011
334
0
The headline of this article makes it sound like it's an achievement.

It should read:
*Apple Slides Back* To The Second Most Valuable Publicly Traded Company in the World.

-------------------------------------------------------
You can't talk sense to a fan-boy
 

HobeSoundDarryl

macrumors G5
What you are forgetting is that investing in stocks that make no money and are pumped up on future earnings potential has incredible risk. You can double your money in a month, and you can half it at the same time.

The Netflix ride is a great example: 50 ---> 300 ---> 50 ---> 170 today (up 70 dollars in 2 days).

Growth stocks have tremendous risk. The beauty of AAPL is that it has growth stock potential (a la 2012), but offers the support of a blue-chip (tons of cash in the bank, lots of revenue/profit, dividend).

I would never recommend that someone invest in a company like FB or NFLX without monitoring their account daily. Risk vs. Reward. There is not a lot of risk in AAPL over the next 24 months. FB or NFLX could be worthless by then.

True, but rather than monitor daily, I just put in trailing stops. With AAPL, the trailing stop had risen to about $650 when it crossed $700. The trailing stop automatically bails one out when the stock falls to a certain point. It works just as well on a FB or NFLX as it does on a blue chip or AAPL.

For amateur investors who still can't bear to part with AAPL or for those believing today might be the buying opportunity on AAPL, I'd say put in a trailing stop at a percentage below today's price where you just can't see it falling. Then if it does fall through that, you lose today's price minus that exit price (or so). If it rises from here, the stop will trail it as it climbs. For example, if it runs right back up to $700, the trailing stop at- say- 6%- will be set at about $658, ready to bail you out of the stock if it then slips back down to that level or lower.

If you buy FB or NFLX or any others, I'd suggest doing the same. Then, you don't have to overly worry about the downside, yet you can ride it up as far as it might go.
 

Technarchy

macrumors 604
May 21, 2012
6,753
4,927
Apple stock price was greatly inflated by investors that were in it for the short term, riding the iOS wave, and delusional new to Apple fanboys that think Apple should and could pull magic out its ass every six months.

The market is starting to settle down a bit and regain some normalcy for Apple.

This decline is no big surprise. It will probably spike again when Apple intros the next big thing, but I don't see Mac, or iOS sales alone ballooning stock price again, and if it does, at least everyone knows not to buy high.
 

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
14,622
20,816
Apple stock price was greatly inflated by investors that were in it for the short term, riding the iOS wave, and delusional new to Apple fanboys that think Apple should and could pull magic out its ass every six months.

The market is starting to settle down a bit and regain some normalcy for Apple.

This decline is no big surprise. It will probably spike again when Apple intros the next big thing, but I don't see Mac, or iOS sales alone ballooning stock price again, and if it does, at least everyone knows not to buy high.

Every number is a record breaker, EXCEPT the stock price. That should tell anyone with a grain of common sense that something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
 

Technarchy

macrumors 604
May 21, 2012
6,753
4,927
Every number is a record breaker, EXCEPT the stock price. That should tell anyone with a grain of common sense that something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

It's the stock market. Something is always shady.
 

eyehop

macrumors regular
Oct 31, 2005
130
7
I just had a flashback to 1995 when I was a lone mac user closet case and Win 95 was going to take the world by storm. Who'da thunk?
 

bungiefan89

macrumors 6502a
Apr 5, 2011
565
76
Honestly these huge drops every day are just making Wall Street look stupid right now. I mean what really constitutes all this panic selling?
I'm no economist, but maybe it has something to do with Apple's success over the past few years. Since the iPhone 4, they've done phenomenally, with huge growth quarter after quarter after quarter. People saw the trend, so they jumped onboard the money-train.

Suddenly, they earn a lot, but not as much as people expected they would, so the extra people are jumping ship and cashing in their returns...

...yes, it's obvious I don't buy stocks at all, isn't it. :eek:
 

bencjedi

macrumors 6502
Apr 2, 2010
279
25
It's freaking killing me that I bought at $605. I'm not selling (this is a long-term investment), but it's a little soul-crushing watching the stock keep dropping. It'll come back up, though, but it's hard to take right now.

I caved having bought in at $660. Bought 10 earlier in the year and sold 8 a week before the slide, so I am hanging onto 2 remaining shares. That's about all I can watch disappear more, God for bid it continues.
 

FrozenDarkness

macrumors 68000
Mar 21, 2009
1,727
968
Google hasn't figured out mobile what? Advertising?

Facebook is a valuable search tool that makes facebook money?

Right now - I don't see Facebook as that much competition for Google except the fact they are kicking Google +'s ass.

Facebook is the (advanced version) AOL of the current generation. Remember when everyone was on AOL, the chat rooms, buddy lists, etc. I don't suspect they will suffer the same fate as AOL - but they could. In the tech world - you just never know. Who would have predicted FB's rise? Or Palm's demise?

Google hasn't figured out mobile advertising yet, and also how to monetize android.

But it's not about "search" revenue, searching doesn't make google money per se. it's about search ad revenue. If I was a company and I want to advertise my services, I would, of course, like more data than less data so I can better direct my ads towards people who exhibit certain behaviors. Google does this with cookies and search history, Facebook does this with your friggn personal information. That's why I see them as direct competitors
 

FrozenDarkness

macrumors 68000
Mar 21, 2009
1,727
968
I actually think an iTV makes no sense. why would they put themselves in a money losing business when they could just do it all from a small box like the appletv? I never understood this. what can't you do with an appletv that you can do with a full television?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.