Apple Among Highest-Ranking Brands in Latest Workers' Rights Report

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 21, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    International aid organization Baptist World Aid Australia released its Electronics Industry Trends report that examines working conditions for employees throughout the technology supply and manufacturing chain (via ZDNet). Apple was one of the highest-ranking brands in the report, which includes suppliers in all facets of the supply chain starting with mineral extraction and extending to the end stage of product assembly.

    [​IMG]
    According to the report, Apple scored a B+, placing it just below Nokia, which was the leader with a B+ score on the basis of being able to prove it was paying workers a living wage. Paying a living wage was a key metric, with most of the surveyed companies (97 percent) not able to confirm they were paying workers at a rate that would meet their basic needs for food, water and shelter.
    Apple has made significant progress in addressing poor working conditions in supplier factories, following several high-profile reports of labor violations at manufacturers such as Pegatron and Foxconn. Apple now routinely audits supplier factories and documents working conditions in a yearly report published on the company's Supplier Responsibility section of its website.

    Apple has pledged to prevent excessive work hours, unethical hiring policies, and the hiring of underage workers at the factories that supply Apple with parts. The company takes this commitment seriously, dropping suppliers when they are found to be violating its Supplier Code of Conduct.

    Article Link: Apple Among Highest-Ranking Brands in Latest Workers' Rights Report
     
  2. macrumors member

    sp3k0psv3t

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    #2
    Not surprising. All the attention Apple gets has forced improved working conditions.

    A good development for all involved.
     
  3. macrumors 68000

    Cuban Missles

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    Location:
    My heart is in Camagüey, the rest in the USA
    #3
    This is positive news indeed. As this continues, it will probably increase labor cost (and hopefully labor salaries). Not only is this good for the labor force in other countries. It should also make the US labor force more competitive.
     
  4. macrumors 68020

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #4
    With no insult intended towards the US, the ridiculous leadtime on the Mac Pro helps me to believe this won't happen for a long time.
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    autrefois

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Location:
    Somewhere in the USA
    #5
    Apple can't prove that the workers in its production chain get a living wage (have enough money for food, water, and housing), but they still get a B+? Talk about grading on a curve...

    I think that's sad. I know Apple and others are working to improve conditions, but if only one company (Nokia) can show that the workers making their products can actually make a living, then change is not happening quickly enough.
     
  6. macrumors 601

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    #6
    Why do we never hear about the working conditions for Samsung laborers ?
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Location:
    Earth
    #7
    You don't know what you are talking about. I've seen and been part of China sourcing for 10+ years and believe me top tier firm like Apple/Foxconn is so much better than the typical small factories around the rest of China. Why do you suppose there are always thousands (tens of thousand) of people linking up for job interview at those factories? Someone put a gun to their head?

    You have no ideas what the real world is like and how bad it is down on the farm or where they come from. Typical first world citizen seeing the world with their own lens.
     
  8. macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #8
    As far as I'm aware, Apple use Samsung labourers for some parts.
     
  9. macrumors regular

    iSteve-O

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    #9
    Does this mean they can finally cut the suicide nets down?
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    Nunyabinez

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Location:
    Provo, UT
    #10
    You need to do some research. Foxconn workers live in dorms where they work. So they live and work in one location. Sometimes people have problems and kill themselves. Usually they do it at home. If you look at the suicide rate for people in China and the suicide rate for people working at Foxconn you'll find the rate much lower than the general population. But that story doesn't sell newspapers (or get click-throughs). This was reporting bias at it's finest.
     
  11. macrumors 601

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    #11
    Then why is Apple always in the news about labor practices and never anything about Samsung ?
     
  12. autrefois, May 21, 2014
    Last edited: May 21, 2014

    macrumors 65816

    autrefois

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Location:
    Somewhere in the USA
    #12
    Please re-read my post. The report says they're not making a living wage. I think it would be good for everyone to make a living wage. You don't?
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    Gasu E.

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    Not far from Boston, MA.
    #13
    No, it does not say they are not making a living wage. Please re-read the article. It says Nokia was the only company that provided a definitive demonstration that they were paying a living wage. Just because something is not demonstrated, doesn't mean it isn't true.
     
  14. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 20, 2014
    #14
    Apple's fault?

    I don't necessarily see this as Apple's fault. It seems like they're doing something with the annual report and taking the initiative and commitment to make sure working conditions are at standard and pay rate as well. I think it definitely has to do more with the factory itself and probably even the Chinese government. Who's to blame? It's such a big production and such a huge country.
     
  15. macrumors 603

    bedifferent

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Location:
    NY
    #15
    It's horrendous, I know. My question: what is the baseline for these ratings? If the baseline are factories with horrific conditions, then isn't that measure relatively low to start? Using a low bar to justify that other factories are following protocol and doing well doesn't state much about the overall working conditions in China. Certainly it's better, but does that truly mean it's acceptable? Perhaps China and the companies that do business with many plants in Asia, need to raise the bar before making claims to improvements (not just Apple, everyone).

    I'm also interested to know if these companies are aware of evaluations ahead of time. Certainly the employees don't want to lose their jobs, so they'll play nice for the camera's and say what they believe they should in order to keep their employment. I'm interested to know what goes on behind the scenes; their living conditions next to the factories (of which have not been addressed to my knowledge), health and healthcare, statistical analysis especially regarding their hourly wages and the cost of living (housing, food, healthcare), etc.

    These ratings can be based on anything without proper unannounced objective evaluations, of the factory and living quarters. If we want to improve conditions, we need to raise the bar used to judge the acceptability of such conditions. Otherwise, these evaluations mean nothing without proper analysis, statistical data on wages, cost of living, life expectancy/health of workers, pollution in working conditions, etc. It's not enough to state, "Well, it's better than x." If civil rights movements used such reasoning, we wouldn't be better off than we were before.
     
  16. macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #16

    Look, it's only as far as I'm aware. Samsung do manufacture a lot of screens for Apple, so it's logical to assume Samsung are involved.

    I could be wrong.
     
  17. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Location:
    Redondo Beach, California
    #17
    The long lead times for th first Mac Pros were not because of any mistakes. I think what Apple did was to size the factory based on the long term depend for Mac Pros. Lets say that is 1,000 per week. But when they were first announced they got 10,000 orders per week. This will not continue.

    So what should Apple have done? Hire lots of extra stall and then fire then after four months? They might have done that but what to do with al the extra factory space.? No, they just lived with a temporary shortage.
     
  18. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Location:
    Redondo Beach, California
    #18
    The baseline for many of the workers is their last job. Likely it was subsistence farming, making what they hoped was enough to eat, working 7 days a week outdoors in all weather, living with no electrical power or running water.

    This was the case in China not long ago. ANY factory job as so much better than what they had at home. But now they are used to the factory job. So new factories are compared to old ones and slowly the standards are going up.

    100 years ago a factory worker in the US would be fired for an on the job injury. The bos would say "I hired you when you had both hands. I don't need a one handed worker, go home, don't come back." But slowly we raised the standards here.

    Eventually those factory jobs turn into engineering, marketing and service jobs just like what happened in the US. I think a slow progression in inevitable and can't happen overnight.
     
  19. macrumors 601

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    #19
    I was actually wondering why we never hear about any manufacturing issues with Samsung as far as the Samsung phones that are produced. Do they not have the same issues as Apple as far as workplace hours, safety, and living wage ? If so, why is Apple always singled out ?
     
  20. mrxak, May 21, 2014
    Last edited: May 21, 2014

    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2004
    Location:
    Drifting through space in a broken escape pod
    #20
    It's insane to think that any country can simply skip over industrialization and go from an agricultural economy to a service economy. Conditions in China are exactly how they were not so long ago in every modern western country. These unskilled, uneducated laborers working in Chinese factories may not have the best jobs in the world, but their children will have better jobs, and their grandchildren will have even better jobs. These factory workers know this, and it's why they're so eager for these factory jobs.

    What's the alternative? Give them no jobs at all, and their families starve. The argument you hear is "just pay them all more" but where does that money come from? The only reason those jobs are there is because people won't buy products that cost more. If wages and worker conditions were the same everywhere, then every product would be built locally. There aren't enough people in China with enough money to support the number of workers in these factories. No matter how you look at it, there is no solution that results in higher pay for Chinese labor, other than letting natural market forces take their course.

    We already know how the story ends. You think China doesn't want to be like the US, Germany, or England? They're undergoing the same process that those countries had to, and ultimately China will end up in the same place. Why anyone would want to disrupt or delay that process is beyond me.
     
  21. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2014
    #21
    5 comments in and Samsung gets a namecheck? Is this a record?. Obsessed much?..
     
  22. macrumors 601

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    #22
    Not at all. All we hear in the news is that Apple's factories are terrible to workers. Can you give me one example where another vendor like Samsung was mentioned ?
     
  23. macs4nw, May 22, 2014
    Last edited: May 22, 2014

    macrumors 68030

    macs4nw

    #23
    So true. Additionally, of course most reasonable-minded people wouldn't want to deny the Chinese people the opportunity to enjoy the same standard of living as we do, however this is a process that has to run it's natural course, and that can not be rushed by western 'meddling'. Apple has done, and is continuing to do, the best they can hope to achieve as outsiders, ie severely curtail child labor (there's no proof that it's 100% gone), and prevent the most glaring of abuses to happen under their noses, so to speak.

    Wholesale change will come, but not overnight, and it's the Chinese government that will have to be instrumental in the process of achieving a fair standard of living, and reasonable working conditions for their citizens.

    I strongly suspect that our 'feel good' and well-meaning, but misguided interference in their domestic affairs is most unwelcome.
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Location:
    Canada
    #24
    I call it the Nike Effect. The companies that get **** for this stuff are always the first to clean up their act, eventually becoming some of the better brands out there.
     
  25. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2004
    Location:
    Drifting through space in a broken escape pod
    #25
    Well we heard it from the workers themselves, when their hours were curtailed. They weren't being allowed to work as much as they wanted to.
     

Share This Page