Apple Borrows iOS 5's Wi-Fi Sync From Rejected App Submission

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jun 9, 2011.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    It's no secret that Apple's forthcoming iOS 5 incorporates a lot of new features and ideas that might say the company "borrowed" from third-party developers, but one feature in particular is raising some eyebrows: Wi-Fi Sync.

    Way back in April 2010, we profiled an app called Wi-Fi Sync that allowed users to sync their iOS devices wirelessly to iTunes. The application was submitted to Apple for inclusion in the App Store, but it was rejected. The developer subsequently released the app into the Cydia store for jailbroken devices, where it has been selling well at a $9.99 price point.

    As noted by TUAW, Apple's Wi-Fi sync feature enabled by the combination of iOS 5 and iTunes 10.5 bears a strong resemblance to the original third-party app, right down to the name and the design of the icon Apple is using to promote it.
    [​IMG]


    The Register follows up with Greg Hughes, the developer of the original Wi-Fi Sync app, who notes that he was "fairly shocked" to see the similar feature make an appearance on Monday.
    Hughes notes that Apple took a special interest in his initial application, with a member of the developer relations team personally calling him to report the rejection and to say that the iPhone engineering team had looked at the application and had been impressed. Hughes says that Apple had also requested a copy of his curriculum vitae, suggesting that the company did have some interest in what he was up to.

    In an email to a customer sent in June 2010 after the original Wi-Fi Sync application had been rejected, Apple CEO Steve Jobs noted that the company was planning to introduce a Wi-Fi syncing feature "someday", although he provided no indication of what stage of development the feature was at or when the company hoped to release it.

    Article Link: Apple Borrows iOS 5's Wi-Fi Sync From Rejected App Submission
     
  2. macrumors member

    itsthenewdc

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    #2
    No.. they didn't borrow it from the rejected app.. They used two already universal/common logos already in Mac OS X and combined them to make sense of Wifi-Sync..
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Location:
    New Yawk
    #3
    "Borrowed" implies what was taken from the owner will be given back to the owner.

    Very poor choice of words in this context. I believe a better word is "stole".
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Location:
    somewhere
    #4
    When Apple does it, people call it "borrowing". When everyone else does it, it is called "stealing".

    Double standard much?
     
  5. macrumors regular

    lshaner

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    #5
    Apple is known for rejecting apps that implement / re-implement existing features...or perhaps in this case, PLANNED features, not yet implemented (by Apple).

    One could also point out that the use of the volume up button as a photo shutter button was previously made possible by more than one App which was pulled for "user interface violation" reasons and will now be coming as part of iOS 5.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Location:
    Chicago
    #6
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8J2)

    It's important to note that cydia's wi-fi sync requires another program installed on your computer and generally speaking performs like ****.
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    #7
    While I don't think Apple have taken anything (the icon is just plain what an icon for wireless sync should be, what else could it be?) it is a bit of a double standard to call this 'borrowing'. Borrowing without permission is stealing. Even though I don't think this is the case.
     
  8. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    #8
    Ok so yeah to be fair the icons resemble each other but, that is the exact same wifi icon that Apple already uses, and the same sync icon Apple already uses just overlaying one another. I don't think this was Apple trying to steal the guys icon, this was them reusing icons they already had in use, plain and simple.
     
  9. macrumors 68040

    eastercat

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Location:
    PDX
    #9
    A feature like wi-fi syncing has to be done by apple. Besides, considering that they asked for what amounts to a resume, he could've gotten hired if he chose.
     
  10. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2009
    #10
    Looks like iSync icon to me. Plus wifi.
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    #11
  12. macrumors member

    -bender-

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Location:
    miles from nowhere
    #12
    Is it me or do these new features feel shoe-horned into the phone's UI and hardware?
     
  13. macrumors 603

    chrmjenkins

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    #13
    Yeah, there's not really any other intuitive way to combine the sync and wifi logos into one icon.
     
  14. macrumors 65816

    chaos86

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2003
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    #14
    I bought that piece of crap app. It works, but there's nothing automated about it, it screws up your normal syncing, and runs a daemon that sometimes goes to 100% CPU until you force quit it. He released one version, never a single bugfix (for the OSX version), and charged $10. I bought it to support this independent developer who got rejected from the AppStore, and then he dropped the project entirely.
     
  15. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #15
    The creator of the app (who did something cool and I hope saw some success) “borrowed” Apple’s WiFi and Sync icons to make a WiFi Sync icon (not that others haven’t used those symbols too).

    It’s absurd to think that iOS would never cut the cord as it evolved; that was inevitable regardless of the existence of this app. It was always a matter of time.

    And it’s absurd to think that Apple should not have used their already-existing WiFi and Sync icons in combination, just because someone else already combined them! Should Apple have made up two entirely new, unknown symbols for this purpose, not matching the rest of Apple’s products?

    Whose eyebrows are being raised by this? :p
     
  16. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    #16
    Seems simple to me:
    1. That Apple combined the Wifi icon with an iSync icon to create the icon for WI-FI SYNC shouldn’t exactly be ”shocking”.
    2. Apple has obviously been planning the ability to sync data over Wifi for a LONG time and had every right to reject his app based on that.
    3. That’s it. Done. :D
     
  17. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2010
    #17
    I'm sure Apple never thought of WiFi Sync b4 some frickin developer...it never entered their minds....a big fat W (hatever)
     
  18. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2009
    #18
    strange

    if it was the other way around alot of you would say it was stolen from apple if apple gave u crap to eat you would say thank you and eat it alot of you need to stop acting mindless and think for youself guess thats asking too much
     
  19. macrumors member

    CindyRed

    Joined:
    May 26, 2011
    #19
    If you think about it, both icons make sense. It's just the Apple 'sync' icon with the Apple 'wifi' icon crammed in the middle. To come up with something different is just silly. Sure, Apple may already have designers working for them, creating icons like this, which is quite obvious from the respective separate icons that make up the new 'air sync' icon, but that's how product identification works.

    With a feature such as wireless syncing being on every iPhone user's wish list since the first generation phone, it's hard to believe that the phone's creators needed a third party app to give them the idea to finally implement it.

    To say it was 'borrowed' or 'stolen' or saying anything else that may imply Apple didn't come up with the idea themselves without evidence is just plain libel and slander.

    A complete mis-nomer when there is no evidence of ideas being pilfered.
     
  20. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Location:
    Texas
    #20
    this.is.ridiculous.
     
  21. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Location:
    Copenhagen
    #21
    "When Apple does it, people call it "borrowing". When everyone else does it, it is called "stealing".

    Double standard much?"
    When Apple does it, people call it "copying". When everyone else does it, it is called "inventing".

    :eek:
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    #22
    How else was Apple supposed to implement Wi-Fi Sync? And how else were they suppose to make the icon look?
     
  23. macrumors member

    DCstewieG

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    #23
    The method of syncing is pretty different too, as the rejected app talked to iTunes directly (requiring the computer to be on) but Apple's implementation talks to iCloud so the computer can be off and you could even be on a totally different network. Very different. Not to say Apple's method is better because it could very well be slower unless they first detect iTunes on your local network to sync directly before going out to the cloud. Either way it's more complex.
     
  24. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    #24
    Seriously?

    You can't be serious about this.

    1. Apple has been asked/trying to put this feature for the last 2 years?

    2. The icon is more or less common sense isn't it?

    But yeah, inb4 troll attack.
     
  25. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    #25
    Borrowed? No.
    The MobileMe and Apple Sync Logos are exactly like that sync symbol around it.
    The WiFi symbol is exactly the same as the WiFi symbol on iOS devices. In fact, I'm willing to bet that they used the assets they already had to make this logo instead of making it from scratch.
     

Share This Page