Apple Chairman Art Levinson to Head Google Spinoff Dedicated to Solving Age-Related Health Issues

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Sep 18, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Google is launching a new, entirely separate company called Calico. The firm will be dedicated to tacking major, long-term healthcare initiatives like significantly extending the human lifespan.

    Calico will be helmed by Arthur Levinson, the chairman and former CEO of biotech firm Genentech. Levinson is also a longtime board member and Chairman of Apple, and a director of Hoffmann-La Roche, a Swiss healthcare and pharmaceutical firm.

    In a Google press release, Apple CEO Tim Cook spoke about Art Levinson, who will remain on the board at Apple:
    Time Magazine will put the new company on its cover next week, under the headline "Can Google Solve Death?"

    The magazine spoke to Google CEO and co-founder Larry Page about the venture, which Page hopes can take a moonshot and perhaps solve some major health issues by looking at long-term healthcare R&D that isn't based on quarter-by-quarter profits.
    Calico will be an entirely separate entity from Google, operating outside the Google X research arm that is responsible for Google Glass and the company's self-driving car project.

    Article Link: Apple Chairman Art Levinson to Head Google Spinoff Dedicated to Solving Age-Related Health Issues
     
  2. macrumors G5

    Rogifan

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    #2
    Hmm...I'm not sure why Apple would keep Levinson on as chairman. And WTF is Tim Cook giving comments in a Google press release?!! Also, I don't think it's coincidental that Google announced this the week Apple releases new software and iPhones.
     
  3. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    #3
    Good, I'm glad someone with money is trying to solve this problem. There are plenty of smart people who have the knowledge and desire to work on this type of medicine, but money is always the limiting factor.
     
  4. macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #4
    Seems... far fetched, but who knows?

    The implications for society of longer lifespans are fairly staggering. Imagine if people have 40, 50 year retirements or longer? Or, would people be able to stay healthy and just work for another 20 years or so. Imagine the implications for the world population?
     
  5. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Location:
    Earth
    #5
    I'd like to see this company bring in Apple, Microsoft, Intel, Adobe, and other tech giants to lead the way into healthcare.

    Imagine what can be done with the money and resources all these companies can provide.

    If this is done for non-profit, imagine what existing healthcare companies will be faced with. Its about time all these billions of dollars goes to something important.
     
  6. macrumors G5

    Rogifan

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    #6
    As long as this company is independent from Google.
     
  7. macrumors 68040

    ValSalva

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Location:
    Burpelson AFB
    #7
    Aging is not a health problem. It's natural. Without death none of us would be alive. When are these rich guys with nothing else to do going to realize that when it's their time to go, it's their time to go. Such self-importance. Not that this research will get anywhere. Huge waste of time and money.
     
  8. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #8
    Will now wait to see how long Art is accused of "stealing" from Apple and giving intel to Google

    Will now wait for someone to comment how they wouldn't trust any health related information with a spin-off from Google because they will just sell it for advertising. I can see it now "I wouldn't take that vaccine developed by the spinoff from Google. They probably inserted some nanochips in there to track my every move"
     
  9. macrumors 6502

    SgtPepper12

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Location:
    Germany
    #9
    Extending life causes more problems than it solves, at the moment. Imagine you can extend life to up to 200 years. They'd need medication and machines for most of the time and they're bearly alive. Morally, you are bound to keep those people alive as long as possible, but thinking more rationally, you are building a trap. I don't think "solving death" is something people actually want. Personally, I'm scared of that idea.
     
  10. Administrator

    Doctor Q

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Kepler-452b
    #10
    Good luck, Calico. We lost Steve Jobs but Arthur Levinson knows what he's doing so maybe now Tim Cook can live forever.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Location:
    Earth
    #11
    It mentioned its an entirely separate company.

    ----------

    First: It's barely, not bearly.

    Second: I don't think people care to live longer. People just want the ability to live it healthy until their time is up. (eg. someone who has a tumor, can have it removed, and returned to 100% normal health). Natural death is what we all hope for.
     
  12. macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #12
    And people say Apple is too full of itself.
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Location:
    Holocene Epoch
    #13
    Larry is trying to buy immortality?
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    #14
    Yeah, exactly. But money isn't leadership. The wording in the article and by the quoted individuals is kind of obnoxious.

    I hope this tech giant wealthy guy doesn't think this is a simple fix. As Cooke said... 20 years down the line. And that's probably optimistic.

    ----------

    You kidding? I want to live forever. Healthfully, yes. But I sure as hell (not that i believe in hell) do want more life. My life has been wasted by playing the games of my society and being screwed by it. I need way more lifespan to fix what was done to me emotionally, socially, and economically. There's no way I can scrape my carcass out of the 99% in what time I've left.

    "I want more life fuc#er!"

    (I hate censoring myself, it's so childish. Does this site even care?)
     
  15. macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #15
    People don't want to live longer? Well, I do, so that kind of shoots your theory.

    Dying of cancer is a totally natural death, not that anyone would choose to go that way, except over the many others that even more unpleasant.

    The issue here is the vague mission of this company. What are their goals? How are they going to achieve them? Not to be too cynical here, but it seems to me like this is the ultimate good guy move by Google. They get great press, even if this company does nothing of use, which seems highly likely.
     
  16. macrumors 65816

    SockRolid

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Location:
    Almost Rock Solid
    #16
    Can Google solve Death?
    Maybe. But only if they cancel the self-driving car project.
     
  17. macrumors 68000

    pubwvj

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2004
    Location:
    Mountains of Vermont
    #17
    Oh, really? Not long ago lifespans averaged half as long as they do today. Clean water, sanitation and such are responsible for most of that doubling of lifespans. Sometimes simple little things reduce the death rate and aging of organisms. "Aging" is quite complicated. Perhaps with some other simple things it might again be doubled. I realize there are some people who are bored with life and want to move on but some of us are quite busy and have a lot more to do before we're done. Another thousand years might make a dent in my to-do list...

    Hmm... Yet some organisms live for thousands of years and their descendants are also alive.

    ----------

    No, you're thinking of sickness. Aging is merely getting older. We now get older and live much longer healthier lives than the average person did a century or so ago. Simply solving some basic problems like sanitation and clean water made a big difference. Other small differences could keep people healthy for centuries, or indefinitely. People who wanted to would be able to continue living productive, creative lives. You might want to stop but many of us are still actively engaged with life into advanced ages and have long to-do lists we want to keep working on. I for one enjoy the process.

    What probably does need to be canceled is the concept of Retirement. That is a modern idea that should be killed.
     
  18. macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #18
    The more I think about this, the more it seems like the creepiest publicity stunt in history.

    First, you'd think this was the world's first effort to study age and health issues. Well, hardly. Many not-for-profits have been on this task for decades. Hey, but they're not run by tech geeks, so what do they know?

    Second, the founders of Google are billionaires many times over. If they wanted to start a charitable corporation to advance health issues, they could have endowed one, and probably attracted the support of other wealthy benefactors. But instead, they formed it under the Google flag. Chilly, brrr.

    Finally, is this a charitable corporation, or what? Are they planning on selling health and longevity, assuming they come up with anything?

    The entire thing is bizarre.
     
  19. Administrator

    Doctor Q

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Kepler-452b
    #19
    I expect that self-driving cars will actually save lives, but that occasional failures will be huge black eyes for publicity. Imagine if someone told us that on average flying is safer than driving. We might believe them until a single plane crash frightens us into thinking that flying is much more dangerous.

    Google has the funds to study very challenging problems like these. I don't know how successful they'll be but I'm glad they're funding the projects.
     
  20. macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #20
    Does death need solving?
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    Solomani

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    #21
    If this company remains a Google satellite/subsidiary, and its leader is an Apple Board Chairman.... then this is a massive conflict of interest. The same way that resulted in a Federal investigation into Eric Schmidt (that would be me!) being a Google mole inside Jobs-era Apple.

    The conflict of interest is erased once this new company becomes completely independent from Google.... which does not seem to be the case.
     
  22. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2011
    #22
    A PR exercise in public vanity.
     
  23. macrumors G5

    Rogifan

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    #23
    But it got Google on the front page of Time Magazine the same week Apple is launching new iPhones. Only good thing is people don't read magazines anymore. :D
     
  24. macrumors 68020

    Solomani

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    #24
    Google... yes, creepy is the right word.
     
  25. macrumors 68030

    needfx

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Location:
    macrumors apparently
    #25
    longer lifespans will lead to manned deep space exploration
     

Share This Page