Apple Impressed by Beats' Ability to Attract Paid Subscribers, Likely to Keep Brand Separate

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 12, 2014.

  1. MacRumors
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Music industry veteran Jimmy Iovine is believed to be the primary target in Apple's rumored acquisition of Beats Electronics, but the company also is eyeing Beats' streaming music service and the Beats branded headphone business, reports Bloomberg. Apple likely will assume leadership of the company, but keep the Beats brand independent.

    Beats co-founder Iovine previously pitched the idea of a streaming music service to both Steve Jobs and Tim Cook, but neither party showed interest until the streaming music service launched earlier this year.
    Beats Music could fill a gap in Apple's music portfolio, which now offers digital downloads via iTunes and iTunes Radio, a channel-based music streaming service akin to Pandora. Though still a leader in the music download arena, iTunes is losing ground to full-library streaming music services like Spotify, which is poised to overtake iTunes as Europe's largest online digital music service.

    Besides the music service, Apple also will obtain a high-margin headphone business co-founded by rap musician Dr. Dre, Iovine, and early partner Monster cable. As part of the acquisition, Beats will likely remain an independent brand with Apple providing design improvements for future Beats products.

    Both Iovine and Dre may take on senior roles at Apple following Apple's acquisition, remaining at Beats' Los Angeles headquarters and traveling to Cupertino when necessary. Iovine is expected to leave his role as chairman of Interscope Geffen A&M records and use his music industry experience to help Apple secure future deals with music labels.

    Article Link: Apple Impressed by Beats' Ability to Attract Paid Subscribers, Likely to Keep Brand Separate
     
  2. LorenzMeir
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    #2
    Sounds good to me
     
  3. OS X Dude
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    OS X Dude

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Location:
    UK
    #3
    So, my post on the matter could very well be right :D
     
  4. losthorse, May 12, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2014

    losthorse
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
  5. spyguy10709
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    spyguy10709

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Location:
    One Infinite Loop, Cupertino CA
    #5
    It wouldn't make sense for Apple to buy a brand for 3+ BILLION dollars, then get rid of the brand. Lets be honest, Apple's buying Beats for the name, not the tech or anything like that... So getting rid of the brand would be HIGHLY illogical. Would be cool to see Beats EarPods, though. I think with Apple's involvement, they could release a comfortable, balanced sounding set of headphones that look really good!
     
  6. Razeus
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #6
    The Beats brand name is too strong to get rid of it.
     
  7. lolkthxbai
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    lolkthxbai

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    #7
    That quote was unnecessary...
    -----

    If this is true, then maybe the deal was not as mysterious as people thought.
     
  8. chriscrk
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    #8
    If people think this acquisition is stupid just because they don't like the headphone quality, they fail to realise the bigger picture, and they are real bozos.
     
  9. cmChimera
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    cmChimera

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    #9
    You're sooo funny and original.
     
  10. Fzang
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Fzang

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2013
    #10
    Why are we still discussing this as if it's already happened? I know this is MacRumors but at least we can discuss iPhone 6 rumors without saying "Yup, this is exactly how it's going to look like 4 months time. No doubt about it".
     
  11. Jack Delgado
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    #11
    What kind of crappy variant of the logo is that?

    Edit: Apologies... that's apparently the official Beats Music logo. Err... not a fan I spose.
     
  12. anradu
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    #12
    Spotify

    Someone please answer me this..
    Spotify's Market Cap is around the 4.5$ billion mark

    Apple are buying beats for 3.2$b

    Why exactly are they pursuing Beats Music - if Spotify has already established itself?

    Just for the hardware?! I understand Irvine and Dre are two they are keen to add onto the board. Otherwise it appears as they are just willing to gobble down the headphone section into their product line..?
     
  13. yinz
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    #13
    The idea of Beats helping the wearable tech from Apple sounds interesting.
     
  14. trife
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    trife

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    #14
    I'm happy for all you Apple doomsday prophets--you can relax now.

    All you undercover (and also overt) bigots can still kick rocks though.

    And to all the aforementioned groups, see you at the iPhone 6 launch.
     
  15. VulchR
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #15
    This still seems a little weird to me. I cannot imagine how anybody could think that Apple s going to get a good ROI on this, but no doubt Apple has information that I do not. Still I would have thought Lytros would have been a better acquisition - they're doing something different that is not so easy to copy. The worst thing about Apple's Beats acquisition is that Samsung and Microsoft will now acquire competing subscription services, ever expanding the range of mediocrity.
     
  16. Michael Goff
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 604

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    #16
    Don't pretend SJ never bought his "innovation". :|
     
  17. whsbuss
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    whsbuss

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Location:
    SE Penna.
    #17
    My guess is "Beats by Apple" will be the branding.
     
  18. satcomer
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    satcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    The Finger Lakes Region
    #18
    All I consider is the Dr. Dre headphone are headphones with a equalizer built in the increase base and take out midrange. The only thing the Beats Headphones are good for is base heavy rap music. Something like Ska or string instrumentss music and it sounds terrible.

    I have to think Apple is really after the rap music crowd and the record labels Dre has has ties with to capture rap music lovers, along with some streaming tech and streaming patents.
     
  19. WinstonRumfoord
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2014
    #19
    So...

    Firefox/John Q Public effectively ousted it's CEO for donating $500 to a cause against gay marriage.

    I wonder what Apple, a historically progressive company will do about Dr. Dre making millions glorifying homophobia and misogyny?

    "Long as my mother****ing pockets was fat
    I didn't give a **** where the bitch was at
    But she was hangin' with a white bitch doin' the **** she do
    Suckin' on his dick just to get a buck or two"

    Just food for thought...
     
  20. avanpelt
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    #20
    Two things are likely, I think: Spotify wouldn't even talk to Apple or Spotify wanted more money than Apple was willing to pay them.
     
  21. Chumburro2U
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Chumburro2U

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Location:
    I Love L.A.
    #21
    Wireless Streaming Headphones

    We don't know of any new products that Beats has coming down the pipe line. Maybe Apple has this info among other info to make this purchase of Beats.
     
  22. Jambalaya
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2013
    Location:
    UK
    #22
    Apple have been "sufficiently impressed" by Beats streaming service launched only a few months ago to pay $3bn for the company - really ? Well the stock market doesn't know what to make of the acquisition, the share are unmoved.
     
  23. kyjaotkb
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Location:
    London, UK
    #23
    converting users into paid? Beats doesn't have an ad-supported conversion funnel. Spotify, Deezer, Bloom do. Beats, Rdio, Napster don't. Beats has not proven that it can convert any users to their paid tier... For the moment, the vast majority of their users are AT&T bundled customers, not standalone paid subscribers.
     
  24. Frankied22
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Frankied22

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    #24
    It's going to be so hilarious if this whole rumor turns out to be just a rumor and Apple doesn't even buy Beats.
     
  25. Zerilos
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    #25
    Valuation does not equal sales price. Whatsapp was valued at 1.5 billion and was purchased for 19 billion.
     

Share This Page