Apple Introduces New Mac Mini With Faster Processors and Quad-Core Option

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Oct 23, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Apple updated its Mac mini line of desktop computers at its media event today.

    [​IMG]
    The updated Mac mini models have new processors, including quad-core chips on the high end, as well as new build-to-order RAM options of up to 16 GB. Pricing remains the same as the prior generation Mac Mini models, starting at $599. There are two standard configuration and a server configuration:
    High-end Mac mini models can now also be configured with Apple's new Fusion Drive technology, which seamlessly integrates a traditional 1 TB hard drive with 128 GB of fast flash storage for both speed and capacity. System files and frequently used apps and data are automatically placed in flash storage to optimize speed, while other data is housed on the slower traditional hard drive.

    The Mac mini was last updated in July of 2011, marking some 460 days since the last update and the new models are available starting today.

    Article Link: Apple Introduces New Mac Mini With Faster Processors and Quad-Core Option
     
  2. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2010
    Location:
    ><
  3. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    #3
    No.

    What's with the server not having an i7 standard?
     
  4. macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #4
    I assume i5 means no hyperthreading? If not, what's the difference?

    I guess it's nice to see quad, but without HT it's a big step down from the "real" quad cpus.
     
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    #5
    i5s have HT.
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Location:
    Bath, UK.
  7. macrumors demi-god

    Spanky Deluxe

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Location:
    London, UK
    #7
    I think that's a typo. There are no quad core i5 mobile processors. It looks like the top end and server models come with Core i7 3610QM processors.
     
  8. macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #8
    So what's the difference between i5 quad and i7 quad?
     
  9. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    #9
    :D No.

    Is this a viable alternative to an iMac in combination with a ACD or TBD? That is the question I look forward to answering with the next TBD update.
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    JG271

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Location:
    UK
    #10
    Any news on the graphics cards? Would be a step backward to loose the discrete graphics.
     
  11. macrumors demi-god

    Spanky Deluxe

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Location:
    London, UK
    #11
    No discrete graphics chips anymore. Downgraded to Intel graphics across the board. Weak.

    I just realised that the new 13" Retina MacBook Pro doesn't even have discreet graphics. I'm not sure how they can get away with driving that many pixels with only a weak integrated graphics chip. The whole lineup looks quite poor at the moment in my opinion. The 13" rMBP and Mac Mini are hindered by poor graphics and the iMac's missing the retina display that everyone knows is due at some point. I see no reason to upgrade from my ageing tech at the moment.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    #12
    I don't want to say I'm disappointed, but losing dedicated graphics (even just the half-useless chip they used before) makes this is a downgrade IMO.

    Now I just don't know what to do...
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    arkmannj

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Location:
    UT
    #13
    looks like it :mad:
    every model is Intel HD Graphics 4000 now.
     
  14. macrumors 68030

    mdriftmeyer

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    #14
    Waste of time manufacturing this out.

    It's nothing but a door stop and a use for surfing the web and email. Too bad. You put in more ram, hybrid drives and you can't manage a 7 series Mobile from AMD or a 6 series mobile from Nvidia. Pathetic.
     
  15. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    #15
    No more graphic cards? What?! I was waiting on buying one for the refresh. I know on the old models, you could play Battlefield 3 with low graphics, how about on this one?
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Location:
    Bath, UK.
    #16
    Nooooooooo :(. Where did the AMD Radeon HD 6630M go?!
     
  17. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    #17
    Will have to see if there's much difference between these and the old ones. With discrete gfx, the previous gen might actually have some advantages.

    Anyone know how the 4000 stacks up?
     
  18. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #18
    I am guessing HD4000 should be more than sufficient for HTPC use?
     
  19. macrumors demi-god

    CWallace

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #19
    It does. The 2.3GHz QC part is an i7 per the specs page on Apple's site.


    Yup.


    In the mobile space, I believe it's L2 cache size and clockspeed.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    golf1410

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
  21. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Location:
    Bath, UK.
    #21
    Didn't the old HD 3000 model have problems? 23.976 IIRC.
     
  22. macrumors demi-god

    Spanky Deluxe

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Location:
    London, UK
    #22
  23. macrumors 68040

    ValSalva

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Location:
    Burpelson AFB
    #23
    Can't mix an SSD and a HDD on the server model? Why?
     
  24. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    #24
    This Intel HD 4000 does have 512MB of graphic power though, so I would imagine, you might be surprised.
     
  25. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #25
    Ths SSD option was a bit steep. How hard is it to replace HD in these newer minis? A 120GB 120 dollar SSD is good enough for me.
     

Share This Page