Apple Invites Pulitzer Prize-Winning Cartoonist to Resubmit Rejected iPhone Application

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Apr 16, 2010.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    Yesterday, the Nieman Journalism Lab reported that Mark Fiore, who earlier this week won a Pulitzer Prize for his political cartoons, had submitted an iPhone application highlighting his work last year, but was rejected by Apple. The rejection was based on prohibitions in Apple's developer agreement against ridiculing public figures.
    Fiore, who publishes his animated works on SFGate.com, the online arm of the San Francisco Chronicle, is notable as being the first online-only journalist to win a Pulitzer Prize.

    The New York Times today reports that Apple has invited Fiore to resubmit his application for inclusion in the App Store. The application was resubmitted this morning, and Fiore is now awaiting word on a decision from Apple, which refused to comment publicly on the situation.



    Article Link: Apple Invites Pulitzer Prize-Winning Cartoonist to Resubmit Rejected iPhone Application
     
  2. macrumors 603

    ChazUK

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Location:
    Essex (UK)
    #2
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7E18 Safari/528.16)

    Let's hope he didn't use a cross compiler when making the app....
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    dvdhsu

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Location:
    Palo Alto, CA
    #3
    Haha, exactly what I was thinking.

    Sometimes, the app store restrictions are a bit ridiculous, and when Apple realizes that they're dealing with people who know what they're doing, they remove those restrictions quickly.
     
  4. macrumors 68020

    spillproof

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #4
    So, famous people can do what they want. Nice, Apple.
     
  5. macrumors 601

    macduke

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Location:
    Central U.S.
    #5
    Haha, and then they reject it again. Double-rejected, to the face!

    But seriously, if I were him, I'd just say "Screw off Apple, you didn't care about me until I was famous!" Then submit my app for Android.

    What happened to "Think Different." ?

    Apple has their hand in the back pocket of too many politicians, it seems.
     
  6. macrumors 68000

    BC2009

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    #6
    iPhone Developer Agreement

    I can't say I am a fan of Adobe Flash as I am a big supporter of an open web, but I must say that if cross-compiled apps are inferior then the customers in the app store will certainly vote with their dollars to favor the natively written apps.

    However, I can see Apple putting this new restriction in their license agreement so as to protect themselves in case the Adobe folks find some way to sneak things onto the iPhone via their cross-compiling tools. Apple is protecting their turf, but by error on the side of caution they set themselves up for bad PR even if they intend to be more lax in acting on those restrictions.

    Here is another example of that occurring.... certainly Apple is choosing to reserve the right to bend the rules where they see fit. But without the strict wording in the developer agreement they really wouldn't have a leg to stand on. They are doing the same with pornography by revoking/rejecting all those junk porn apps that polluted the app store while still allowing the "main stream" stuff from established publishers.

    On one hand, its Apple's store and if they don't want to pollute their shelves with garbage then I applaud them. However, somebody is going to cry foul since there is not another legitimate store for iPhone apps, and I wonder if this will eventually blow-up as some sort of new anti-trust thing.
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    Shasterball

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    #7
    That or they realized it was time to remove their head from you know where because they are not capable of judging an app's true worth...
     
  8. macrumors member

    zemoleman

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Location:
    Yonkers, NY
    #8
    Et tu, Apple?

    Is it me or is Apple becoming a silly caricature of its own 1984 ad?
     
  9. macrumors Core

    alphaod

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Location:
    上海 (Shanghai)
    #9
    that's kind of a double-sided blade; you say screw Apple while taking yourself out of a market with a lot of potential sales.
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2002
    #10
    Here's what I think the cross-compiler issue is. Adobe had the same sort of problem before they bought flash, with their app that made flash files. It was called LiveMotion and it was great. The problem with that app though, was that Macromedia controlled flash, and adobe could only reverse engineer it after the latest version had been released. So, the features of Flash 7 couldn't be realized by the Adobe LiveMotion app until waaaay after the release of Flash 7. Usually near Flash 8, etc. Adobe was essentially always a version behind. Not such a big deal with apps made for desktops and laptops. But if Apple wants to control the experience and have all it's apps updated very quickly for new OS updates, they'd have to reveal all the new features to Adobe way beforehand so that all the people making apps via Adobe's compilier could update them quickly. And of course Apple would be reliant on those developers actually desiring to pay Adobe for an upgrade to flash, which usually only comes out every year and a half or so. Much slower than updates to iPhone and it's OS. So instead, if all the developers are using Apple's tools, Apple can simply slide them a free SDK update and have them recompile. Since updating apps is so simple this way, Apple can easily require that the developers recompile in a certain time frame. Pretty hard to do for the developers that would be going through Flash, and if Adobe didn't update their tools, then the devs couldn't update, and you've got a mess and the only people losing would be the iPhone users, and then of course Apple.

    Not saying it's right or wrong. Just saying that's where Apple's coming from. I really don't think they are trying to piss off Adobe in particular. Why should they be angry at Adobe anyway? They're the ones that didn't allow flash. Adobe should be angry at Apple.
     
  11. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2002
    #11
    Steve looks more and more like the guy on the screen every day!
     
  12. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    #12
    And hopefully Fiore will do a cartoon about it :p ... well maybe not, his app could be banned again :eek:
     
  13. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2008
    Location:
    New York
    #13
    This is a sensible perspective
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2001
    #14
    If when you say silly you mean terrifying? Then yes I do... :mad:
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    dvdhsu

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Location:
    Palo Alto, CA
    #15
    I know!

    Totally! :D
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    #16
    I'm not a developer and have no idea what their policies are but will say I think it's a bit lame to have that double standard. If I was the cartoonist I wouldn't have resubmitted it. Or if I did it would have been a cartoon mocking the double standard of Apple.... I'd then blog about the whole experience. :D
     
  17. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2001
    #17
    Yea unless he's awarded another Pulitzer that is... :rolleyes:

    Apple is really disgusting me with this $#*(%&*( behavior. They really need to completely reevaluate their criteria and make it CRYSTAL EFFING CLEAR what IS and was IS NOT acceptable and then stand by it. None of this 'reject Google Voice because it duplicates functionality' and then 'approve the Opera web browser'. Reject an APP because it 'ridicules public figures' and then plead that the author to resubmit it once he's awarded a Pulitzer...

    This wishy washy crap is really showing everyone just how UNDERHANDED they treat the whole process.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2001
    #18
    THANK YOU! :)
     
  19. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    #19
    x2 of what you said.... you verbalized what I was trying to say a lot better than I. :eek:
     
  20. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    #20
    Wait....there are rules...but then apple can bend them as they see fit?

    The rules should apply to all or to none.

    Just another reason I really hate apple and cant wait for jobs to leave.
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2001
    #21
    Thanks! :)

    I wish they included this but I guess it was more detailed then they were willing to broadcast.

    Just goes to show how two-faced they are.. :(

    Look, believe it or not I'm a big fan of Apple for the most part but the UGLY way they've handled the APP store was/is just too much for me to not speak my mind about it. Oh and before people start screaming... WELL YOU HAVE A CHOICE... Yea I'm well aware of my rights and freedoms and one of them is to LIKE Apple and their products and STILL speak the truth about their militant behavior they exhibit over the APP store.
     
  22. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    #22
    He should give a big SCREW YOU to Apple and make a WinMo, Win7, Android and Pre apps.
    Maybe with enough bad publicity Apple won't be such a dick to developers.
     
  23. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Location:
    Phoenix
    #23
    Right...

    What they really need, though, is the ability to recognize items of merit before turning them down. It reminds me of how ridiculous zero tolerance rules are on school campuses. Expelling students for "weapons" that are not really weapons i.e. finger nail clippers, etc. Rules and filters are fine when not implemented in a manner that lacks common sense. However, it comes with the territory now that Apple is in the media distribution game. To enter such and arena, one accepts the inherent danger of becoming a censor. To be completely open to all content would be an irresponsible business decision in terms of PR. Tighten up your filter a little to much and you land on the other end of negative PR. Apple will be adjusting its policies towards content for years and never find a perfectly safe position.
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    #24
    What the hell, how bizarre. This app store stuff is ridiculous. Either allow satire or don't, and say so in your rules.
     
  25. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Location:
    Phoenix
    #25
    Yep...

    They certainly need to do better, but there is no such thing as "crystal effing clear" in the censorship of media content. They will never make all sides happy. They at least need to keep in line with their history as a company that promotes "Think Different" in their PR. Suppressing ideas and creativity certainly doesn't fall under that flag.
     

Share This Page