Apple Issues Statement in Support of Supreme Court Gay Marriage Rulings

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacRumors, Jun 26, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Apple has given a public statement following the Supreme Court's decision to effectively strike down [PDF] California's voter-approved ban on gay marriage, as well as ruling that the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional [PDF].

    The company, which previously joined a statement filed with the Supreme Court encouraging it to strike down the laws, gave this statement to AllThingsD:
    A number of other tech companies have expressed support for the ruling, as well. Google put an easter egg in the search results for 'gay', while Instagram featured pictures of celebrations about the rulings on its blog.

    Apple has long been in favor of gay rights, frequently saying it was a 'civil rights issue'. The company donated $100,000 to the 'No on 8' campaign in California and has long given health benefits to same-sex couples, even where it is not required by law.

    Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

    The discussion thread is currently closed.

    Article Link: Apple Issues Statement in Support of Supreme Court Gay Marriage Rulings
     
  2. macrumors 68000

    SPUY767

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    GA
    #2
    Apple really should keep their mouths shut on political issues, as should all businesses. Employees are free to have their opinions, but they need not project those opinions onto the brand.
     
  3. macrumors 68040

    Dr McKay

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Location:
    Kirkland
    #3
    Always great to hear. Trying to subjugate people by the ruling of a 2000 year old book is maddening.

    Trying to force religious rules onto people that might not of that religion is maddening full stop.
     
  4. macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #4

    "Corporations are people, my friend."
     
  5. Administrator/Editor

    WildCowboy

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #5
    It's not merely a political issue for Apple. It's also an employee recruitment and retention issue.
     
  6. macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #6
    Bravo to SCOTUS for these rulings (although it would have been better if they went even farther) and bravo for Apple taking a stand on it. I remember hearing about Apple contributing to No on 8 - I was glad to hear it then and I'm glad to hear they continue to have the same values.
     
  7. Contributing Editor

    jlgolson

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Durango, CO
    #7
    I think his point was more that Apple could alienate potential customers with this sort of stance, making it a potential bad idea from a shareholder perspective.

    From a PR point of view, taking stances on political issues can backfire -- though in this case, I don't think Apple has much to worry about.

    This is also a significant consideration.
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    scwinsett

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    #8
    Yay gay
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2001
    #9
    To the contrary. Since Apple is headquartered in California (as is Google) they have a direct interest in the California proposition 8 rulings which the Supreme Court ruled on today. Ensuring that California treats their employees with equality under the law has a direct bearing on their ability to attract and retain top talent.

    Why should companies like Apple or Google not fight for change that will ensure that their employees are treated equally under the law?
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    Kariya

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2010
    #10
    A company whose CEO (and sizeable chunk of its workforce) is rumoured to be gay supports the SCOTUS's decision?

    No. Freaking. Way. Whodathunkit.
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    sawah

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    #11
    Good for them! Take a stand for what you believe, corporation or not.
     
  12. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Location:
    Manhattan
    #12
    Normally I would agree, but this is a civil rights issue. Apple and other companies want to be on the right side of history. The wrong side Chik-Fil-A.
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    treyjustice

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Location:
    TX
    #13
    Good for them. Hopefully everyone will eventually see that even if you don't think it is right it is a humans rights issue and everyone deserves the same rights.
     
  14. macrumors demi-god

    GeekLawyer

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Location:
    The post is coming from inside the house!
    #14
    Thanks, Apple. We think you're the bee's knees, too.


    Love,
    Gay Apple Fans Everywhere
     
  15. macrumors 604

    gkarris

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Location:
    "No escape from Reality..."
    #15
    =

    Kind of sad, though, seeing a larger chasm between the rich and poor, liberal and conservative...
     
  16. macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #16
    So what, are they going to go use Android instead?

    http://www.google.com/diversity/legalise-love.html

    That's out. Windows?

    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/2012/jan12/01-19CorpStatement.aspx

    Well, guess that's out too.

    The bigots are losing. If they wish to boycott companies that support marriage equality, they won't be able to buy anything. They're going to boycott themselves out of a phone, computer, car, house and food.
     
  17. macrumors 68040

    Moyank24

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Location:
    in a New York State of mind
    #17
    Why?

    I like knowing that my money is going to a corporation who believes in my rights. It also helps me decide what companies won't get my money.
     
  18. macrumors 65816

    CristobalHuet

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Location:
    Montreal
    #18
    Appropriate graphic is appropriate. :p
     
  19. MacVault, Jun 26, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2013

    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #19
    I am not for gay marriage but who am I and who is the US Gov to define what marriage is. Government should have no say in this. If I want 1000 wives that should be up to me.

    Apple too should shut the hell up.
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    CristobalHuet

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Location:
    Montreal
    #20
    Brands and companies have significant public influence. This has less to do with opinions and more about spreading awareness and reshaping archaic beliefs about what people should be allowed to do.

    If the big boys and entities don't support them publicly, less and less people will be exposed to the core message.

    This applies to just about anything and is why celebrity endorsements are a popular vehicle for spreading awareness. People will listen when they see a company like Apple or an athlete like Michael Jordan taking a stand for something.

    Apple isn't telling anyone what to do - they're adding their valuable support to a movement that, in my own opinion, could use it. I don't see anything wrong with this.
     
  21. macrumors 68000

    angemon89

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Location:
    The place where Apple designs stuff
    #21
    This makes me want to buy more apple products. :D
     
  22. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Location:
    Illinois
    #22
    How does a gay couple reproduce?

    - They don't

    Reason why it needs to be illegal^
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Location:
    Texas
    #23
    The institution of marriage goes back much further than 2,000 years my friend, long pre-dating biblical times. How about you study up a bit?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage#History_of_marriage
     
  24. theheadguy, Jun 26, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2013

    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Location:
    california
    #24
    The simple fact is that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that DOMA is unconstitutional. End of story (yes, literally - this finally IS the end of DOMA). If you are unhappy with that, then try to dissolve our society's laws and start a new constitution. Oh, and good luck.

    It's their right to do so. You are unable to prohibit them from taking a stance.

    Curious, do you have an actual point? Human are able to evolve. It's in our nature.
     
  25. macrumors 65816

    CristobalHuet

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Location:
    Montreal
    #25
    What does the law have to do with reproduction?

    This isn't the 18th century where government is ruled by religion.

    So, should impotent couples (where a woman or man are unable to contribute to the reproductive process and unable to naturally have children) also be illegal, using your airtight logic?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page