Apple Looking to Launch $799 MacBook Air in 3Q 2012?

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 7, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Digitimes reports that Apple is planning to launch a cheaper MacBook Air in the third quarter of this year, dropping the entry-level price to $799 from the current $999. The move is reportedly being made to take on Intel's "Ultrabook" initiative that is pushing low-cost, ultra-thin notebook PCs.
    Ultrabook manufacturers have so far struggled to match or beat Apple's MacBook Air pricing, leading to weak shipments. But Intel remains committed to the initiative, and is working with manufacturers to continue to bring prices down.

    [​IMG]
    It is unclear just how Apple would achieve a $200 price cut on the MacBook Air, given the company's focus on maintaining high profit margins. Certainly pricing on the solid-state drives used in the MacBook Air will continue to fall, but Apple likely has only limited flexibility to bring down pricing. And given the strong performance of the MacBook Air as Ultrabooks continue to struggle, it is not immediately obvious whether Apple would even see a need to lower pricing on its models.

    Digitimes has a spotty track record with regard to Apple rumors, although it has on occasion offered accurate insight based on sources in Apple's supply chain. The publication's recent claims regarding Apple's notebook plans including a report of production being underway on slimmer 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Pro models, as well as a suggestion that Apple is considering a 14-inch MacBook Air for Asian markets.

    Article Link: Apple Looking to Launch $799 MacBook Air in 3Q 2012?
     
  2. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Location:
    Into the lungs of Hell
  3. macrumors 6502

    The Economist

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Location:
    Mexico
  4. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
  5. macrumors 6502

    Ingot

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    #5
    As much as I want to believe this, I must agree with you. Can't see them dropping the price 200 clams on this one.
     
  6. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Location:
    England!
    #6
    I'm not sure I believe it, but exciting! It would really mean another break into the education market, which I think Apple need to continue doing to get more students being brought up on Macs.
     
  7. macrumors 604

    LimeiBook86

    Joined:
    May 4, 2002
    Location:
    Hanging around in NJ with his cutie. :)
    #7
    It doesn't sound like there is much to back this up. But a $799 Apple laptop is nice to think about... And of course by comparison starting prices at $799 looks much more affordable than $999, especially when you are comparing PCs. (similarly specked or not)
     
  8. macrumors Pentium

    KnightWRX

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    #8
    Too many compromises for Apple to reach that price-point IMO.

    But you never know. An 11 inch using Sandy-bridge left overs at high discount from Intel ?
     
  9. snowmoon, May 7, 2012
    Last edited: May 7, 2012

    macrumors 6502a

    snowmoon

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #9
    Why would it be nonsense? If it were to be offered I would expect it to be educational only and only in bulk. Apple already offers a $999 ( 5-pack ) of a bare bones 13" air, I could see them dropping the disk down to 32gb and offering another Edu-only 10 pack of 11" air's for $800.

    EDIT: Remember many k-12 systems are run on network mounted/portable home directories, you don't need an excessive amount of local disk space.
     
  10. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    #11
    It's never a good sign when the subject is a question.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    #12
    A hard drive that small would be pushing it. 64GB should be the minimum SSD size. With the prices dropping as it is bringing the size down from 64gb to 32gb wouldn't be that smart of a move to make, I think.
     
  13. macrumors Pentium

    KnightWRX

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    #13
    Why ? Different form factors. People that want tablets aren't suddenly going to buy laptops.
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    Lexington, KY
    #14
    Has any rumor from Digitimes ever been correct?
     
  15. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    #15
    32gb is awfully small. How much is left after the OS?
     
  16. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Location:
    USA
    #16
    They'd make up for it by getting people into the ecosystem.
     
  17. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    #17
    I agree... and Apple said that if anybody is going to be cannibalizing sales of their devices, it might as well be them.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    #18
    This rumour is obviously true. Apple has always "raced to the bottom" with the rest of the PC manufacturers. They always want the lowest prices.
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    snowmoon

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #19
    Most k-12 system I know have network mounted/portable home directories and need little in terms of local disk space. The base OS take up 10-15 before apps.
     
  20. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #20
    Apple is able to have cheaper items as long as they minimize cannibalization by giving those cheaper products a noticeable disadvantage. Like, not just less RAM or something, but a difference you can really SEE right in the store.

    In other words, selling the iPhone 3GS doesn't hurt iPhone 4S sales...they just pick up people who would never have bought a 4S, but it doesn't tempt the people who wanted a 4S with that nice sharp display.

    In the past the iMac/eMac relationship worked the same way.

    So this could work, but there has to be a hook that keeps most buyers in the higher models. Just a guess, but these new high-resolution displays I keep hearing about could be one such thing. If the stores are stocked with amazing-looking high-res Macbooks they can be sure most folks will still spring for that once they get a look at it.

    Then, in addition to having older screens, make these cheap Macbooks with less SSD space as the only option and you start to have a computer that will pick up lower-end buyers without tempting the regulars.

    Not saying it's gonna happen, but if they want to do it that's how they could.
     
  21. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    #21
    I disagree.
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    #22
    It would be the perfect student computer if you only take notes and work with text and simple media, but it sounds unlikely that apple would like to cover that "low end market".
     
  23. macrumors 68040

    tigres

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Location:
    Land of the Free-Waiting for Term Limits
    #23
    no it would not, the two are not from the same camp.
     
  24. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    USA
  25. iZac, May 7, 2012
    Last edited: May 7, 2012

    macrumors 65816

    iZac

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2003
    Location:
    Shanghai
    #25
    Discounting whether there is truth to this or not, surely the current bottom spec Macbook Air is now $200 cheaper to manufacture than it was last July? Apples new strategy seems to be to keep on the base model of the last generation at a discounted price... at least for iOS products
     

Share This Page