"People" don't use iPhones more. Just "People" in the US.
"All People" around the world use Android OS more so that pretty much makes your entire post wrong.
Wonder which excuses the Android fanboiis here will post now?
What? Dig your head out of the sand for 5 seconds and look at the market.Yep. It's all price. If all Androids were priced at the same level as iPhones (unsubsidized) $649/749/849 their market share would dwindle very quickly.
You almost never hear that some one got an Android because they really wanted one. It's because it was "FREE" or "very cheap" with their regular contract cycle. Or they broke a phone or whatever and the Android was cheap to replace it. They don't speak with any passion, it's all $ plain and simple.
So people in the US use iPhones more? Then what the heck does your post have to do with anything? This thread's title is "US Smartphone Market Share". What the eff does around the world have to do with anything? It's quite obvious my comment wasn't meant to be representative of the entire damn world since I explicitly did not say that. Learn to read and comprehend English.
People use iPhones more because they last longer. It's not built from really poor quality plastic (ala Samsung). It's got software updates for at least twice or thrice as long as Android based devices (exception are Nexus devices). And let's not forget there are better quality apps on iOS in general. Oh and iOS is easier to use and the interface is consistent across multiple devices, multiple versions of the OS.
What the eff does around the world have to do with anything? It's quite obvious my comment wasn't meant to be representative of the entire damn world since I explicitly did not say that.
Yep. It's all price. If all Androids were priced at the same level as iPhones (unsubsidized) $649/749/849 their market share would dwindle very quickly.
You almost never hear that some one got an Android because they really wanted one. It's because it was "FREE" or "very cheap" with their regular contract cycle. Or they broke a phone or whatever and the Android was cheap to replace it. They don't speak with any passion, it's all $ plain and simple.
People use iPhones more because they last longer. It's not built from really poor quality plastic (ala Samsung). It's got software updates for at least twice or thrice as long as Android based devices (exception are Nexus devices). And let's not forget there are better quality apps on iOS in general. Oh and iOS is easier to use and the interface is consistent across multiple devices, multiple versions of the OS.
You are very right. Samsung does not even sell the Galaxy S3 at the same price as iPhone 5. Looking at unsubsidized prices around the world, on average the Samsung Galaxy S3 sells for a price point between that of iPhone 4 and 4S, and Apple gives no discounts.
People use iPhones more because they last longer. It's not built from really poor quality plastic (ala Samsung). It's got software updates for at least twice or thrice as long as Android based devices (exception are Nexus devices). And let's not forget there are better quality apps on iOS in general. Oh and iOS is easier to use and the interface is consistent across multiple devices, multiple versions of the OS.
Yep. It's all price. If all Androids were priced at the same level as iPhones (unsubsidized) $649/749/849 their market share would dwindle very quickly.
You almost never hear that some one got an Android because they really wanted one. It's because it was "FREE" or "very cheap" with their regular contract cycle. Or they broke a phone or whatever and the Android was cheap to replace it. They don't speak with any passion, it's all $ plain and simple.
These stats are being distorted by the propaganda of android fans who claim that it is a platform, and a smartphone platform at that and that it is dominant
Another one with their head in the sand.What kills me is when people talk like there's some kind of "tablet market".
There is no tablet market. There is only an iPad market.
And in that market, Apple has 100%.
Not sure what unsubsidized prices have to do with anything.
If people actually bought unsubsidized phones, in any major numbers, then the 4 and 4S would have been gone due to low demand. How many do you think decide to save $200 and buy a 4 for $649 instead of a 5 for $849? ($0 vs $200, on the other hand, will trick a lot of low information customers, and that's why the 4 is still around.)
Another one with their head in the sand.
Apple's market share for tablets is just under 50% and falling steady.
(43.6% as of Q4 2012)
Market share 4Q 2011 1Q 2012 2Q 2012 3Q 2012 4Q 2012
Apple 51.6% 67.8% 68.2% 46.6% 43.6%
Samsung 7.3% 6.9% 9.6% 15.1% 15.1%
Amazon 15.9% 4.1% 5.0% 8.3% 11.5%
ASUS 2.0% NA 3.4% 7.8% 5.8%
Barnes & Noble 4.6% NA NA 0.7% 1.9%
Acer NA NA 1.5% NA NA
Other 18.5% 21.2% 12.3% 21.6% 22.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/02/02/apples-ipad-market-share-slips-farther-below-50/
What functionality has been compromised in Android. Name some.
Irrelevant to the conversation.Here is a thought for you. The Kindle Fire and Samsung Galaxy tab are toys. The IPad has 93% of enterprise market share.
http://media.www1.good.com/documents/Good-Q4-Device-Activations.pdf
What? Dig your head out of the sand for 5 seconds and look at the market.
An unsubsidized 16GB S3 retails for $650. A 16GB Note 2 is over $750.
This isn't 2009 anymore.
Premium Android phones cost as much, even more in some cases, than an iPhone.
Sure, there are still cheap crap Android phones out there, but the biggest sellers are on par price wise with the iPhone.
Most carriers don't work the same way as the big 3 in the US.
I've had a chance to use a Nexus 4 for a while.Then there is the Nexus 4 starting at $299. So maybe he has a point when he claims that the iPhone is way overpriced?