Apple Pulls 'FlexBright', Says iOS Apps That Adjust Display Temperature Aren't Allowed

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Mar 9, 2016.

  1. MacRumors
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Earlier this week, we shared a blue-light reduction app called FlexBright, which worked similarly to Apple's own Night Shift mode. Apple initially approved the app, which was able to adjust the screen temperature for the entire iPhone, but after it garnered attention following our post, Apple pulled it from the App Store.

    FlexBright developer Sam Al-Jamal told MacRumors he had worked with Apple through several app rejections to get FlexBright into the App Store and that no private APIs were in use, something that was seemingly confirmed by the app's approval, but further review from Apple led to FlexBright's removal. Al-Jamal has shared Apple's explanation with MacRumors following an "exhausting discussion" with the Cupertino company. "The bottomline is [Apple] won't allow apps to change screen colors," he said.

    [​IMG]
    The FlexBright app adjusted the temperature of the screen to make it more yellow, like Night Shift in iOS 9.3​

    Al-Jamal was given two technical reasons behind FlexBright's removal from the App Store. First, the app was using custom-created classes based on non-public APIs.
    Second, the app was using silent audio to keep FlexBright running in the background, a frowned-upon tactic that can result in battery drain. Late last year, the Facebook app for iOS was using excessive battery life, something caused in part by a silent audio component.

    FlexBright masked the silent audio with a music player to "justify the background music activity," something that Apple approved twice even though the music playing function doesn't appear to work.
    Apple asked Al-Jamal to remove the blue light filter to get FlexBright back on the App Store, but he declined so that users who have already purchased the app can keep the feature. "For all intended purposes, FlexBright is dead," he said. He does plan to go on to make a new app that will detect eye fatigue based on screen brightness and time spent on an iOS device.

    The developer behind FlexBright was using some questionable features to get the app to function, but its ability to slip past the App Store review process even through multiple rejections again puts a spotlight on Apple's inconsistencies and failures when it comes to reviewing apps. MacStories recently shared an in-depth look at the App Store review process, highlighting the problems and frustrations developers face, which rightly points out that the current review process is "harming the quality of apps on the App Store."

    Article Link: Apple Pulls 'FlexBright', Says iOS Apps That Adjust Display Temperature Aren't Allowed
     
  2. Klae17
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Klae17

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2011
  3. JonneyGee
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    JonneyGee

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    #3
    This is nothing new. And with 9.3 on the horizon, it's not really necessary anyway, although it might be nice to have extra options like Flux provides on Mac.
     
  4. arkhanjel
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    arkhanjel

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
  5. bladerunner2000
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    bladerunner2000

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
  6. sputnikv
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    sputnikv

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    #6
    i have no problem with this. i can only imagine the mess it would cause with the average user dealing with third party apps and the troubleshooting nightmare it would cause, especially on the eve of the feature being implemented in iOS 9.3...

    imagine the average user complaining that their pictures look yellow or different and associating it with the camera or their screen and apple not being able to assume in any measure the fault of any one given app
     
  7. Bentron
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    #7
    Get your app featured on MacRumors one day, pulled the next. Bring on iOS 9.3.
     
  8. atomic.flip, Mar 9, 2016
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2016

    atomic.flip
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    atomic.flip

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    #8
    Apple is so full of itself when it does stuff like this. I hate to say this but I'm really glad that Microsoft is finally giving them a run for their money in the desktop and laptop space. Now with something like the Galaxy S7 from Samsung which has force touch and animated photos. Honestly Apple needs to mellow out a bit and let their app ecosystem flourish.

    - Clarification - Force touch did not make it into the S7 or S7 Edge, though it is being tested for use in a future handset from Samsung.
     
  9. rorschach
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    rorschach

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2003
    #9
    So:

    - Basically using private APIs, even though not directly.
    - Claiming your app does one thing so that it can run in the background indefinitely, but it actually does something else.

    Yep, no surprise this got pulled.
     
  10. jdillings
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2015
  11. MasterRyu2011
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    #11

    You sure about this? None of the reviews mentioned it.
     
  12. Splatt123
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    #12
    I installed this yesterday. While it does work (at least it globally changes the screen temperature), looking at the Battery usage in settings, it's taken 53%, listed as "Background Activity".

    Probably best to wait for NightShift but I don't like the fact that Apple have stopped Low Power Mode when NightShift enabled. I suppose they were trying for a work-around and this isn't it.
     
  13. KALLT
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    #13
    Has the developer's claim with respect to what Apple had said at earlier stages actually been confirmed? People can say anything about Apple, the company will rarely comment anyway, even if it is an outright lie. I doubt that Apple would have ever been sympathetic to this kind of app, given that it is always going to be based on private APIs, which is a no-go for Apple.
     
  14. JonneyGee
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    JonneyGee

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    #14
    Makes you wonder, if someone installs 9.3 and has this app, would the color temperature be adjusted twice as much as it should?
     
  15. BSben
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Location:
    UK
    #15
    It is annoying for the many people who have no device that supports Night Shift (and there are plenty of those), but the app looked dodgy, and awkward. I hope Apple will eventually make a Night Shift version for the Mac.
     
  16. AbSoluTc
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    AbSoluTc

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    #16
    What I don't get is, why was it approved to begin with? Why go through this whole song and dance, let it in, then a few days later give a reason why it was pulled. Why not prevent it altogether?
     
  17. meaning-matters
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    meaning-matters

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2013
  18. MasterRyu2011
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    #18
    Is it a surprise that things fall through the cracks. Humans are involved. As long as humans are tasked to catch violations, it'll never be perfect.
     
  19. sputnikv
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    sputnikv

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    #19
    It would probably be a disaster, like looking at your submerged phone in a toilet full of days old unflushed piss
     
  20. Andres Cantu
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Andres Cantu

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Location:
    Rio Grande Valley in South Texas
  21. macs4nw
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    macs4nw

  22. iThingsGurl
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    iThingsGurl

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Location:
    Canada
    #22
    I don't think so. A third party music app does not reduce volume twice that of Apple's own system volume.
     
  23. tmanto02
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    tmanto02

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Location:
    Australia
    #23
    Good. Apple has strict approval policies to maintain a certain quality of apps.

    Of which Flexbright was not.
     
  24. elmateo487
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    #24
    Yeah ok.... Like apple doesn't already have the best AppStore. I'd say flourishing is exactly what it is doing.
    --- Post Merged, Mar 9, 2016 ---
    Those. Are completely different things.
     
  25. d656
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2015
    #25
    What shocks me is that it was approved in the first place. This is like the Instagram password theft app a while back.
     

Share This Page