Apple Releases Major Final Cut Pro X Update with Dual Viewers, Multichannel Audio Tools, RED Camera Support and More

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Oct 23, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Today, Apple released a major update to Final Cut Pro X that was promised back in April. The initial launch of Final Cut Pro X was met with significant criticism due to a lack of many features found in earlier versions of the software. Apple responded to the concerns with promises of updates.

    [​IMG]
    In April, Apple even revealed many features that could be expected in Final Cut Pro X in 2012. These included Multichannel Audio Editing Tools, Dual Viewers, MXF Plug-in Support and RED camera support.

    That version update was released today and includes a number of long awaited features:
    Final Cut Pro X is available in the Mac App Store for $299.99. The 10.0.6 update is free for current customers. [Mac App Store]

    Article Link: Apple Releases Major Final Cut Pro X Update with Dual Viewers, Multichannel Audio Tools, RED Camera Support and More
     
  2. macrumors 6502a

    turtlez

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2012
    #2
    aw now all the FCP haters have to switch back again XD
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    #3
    Final Cut Pro X from October 2011 is a whole different program from the Final Cut Pro X of today. (In a good way)
     
  4. macrumors 68040

    KdParker

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    #4
    This ought to get the mac pro refresh conversation going now....
     
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #5
    Nice! Can't wait to try out some of the new features at work tomorrow.

    Oh hey why no mac pro news today Apple? :D
     
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Location:
    Laurel, Maryland
    #6
    Being a traditional still photog who is more and more interested in video, I will be jumping on this!
     
  7. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2012
    #7
    I'm a current Final Cut Pro 7 user right now, can someone tell me if its worth upgrading to Final Cut Pro X yet?
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    #8
    I'm interested to see the DVD export options. Would love a good replacement of Encore, if they can come up with a great app or extension with equal power. Chapter markers seem to foreshadow that.
     
  9. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 28, 2012
    #9
    As much as it is great news that these features have finally been implemented the fact still remains that Apple have practically given away their film editing market to Avid and Adobe.

    I always used to use Adobe Premiere, switched to the Avid when I began studying film full time and I tried out Final Cut Pro X for use at home. I figured the reports of it being "iMovie Pro" were exaggerations but they really aren't.

    I do hope Apple don't do any more culling of their pro products. I'd hate for future online edits, colour grades, etc. to be done on Windows...
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    #10
    Is it still completely incapable of opening and saving projects on a network volume, limited to local storage only?
     
  11. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Location:
    IN
    #11
    Also Motion update for improved anti-aliasing and the ability to have multiple projects open simultaneously.

    Compressor updated to improve cluster setup, ability to re-activate additional clusters without re-authentication, and fixes an issue with third-party QuickTime components.
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Location:
    Canada
    #12
    I wouldn't hold your breath for apple to make any new DVD authoring software. They abandoned iDVD and I doubt if there is any plans for a DVD Studio Pro replacement. Not to mention they have been omitting optical drives from all their new macs. All signs point to no.
     
  13. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #13
    It's a big huge 'depends.'

    I'm fortunate enough to have both Final Cut and Premeire so I can pick by project. I prefer Premeire for for projects that will have many layers and effects.

    But I really am liking Final Cut X for both music videos and multicam 'live' events that I want to switch in real-time in post. For those particular projects I can really get into what Apple was trying to do here. But if you're doing very meticulous, multi-track videos then Premeire may feel more like home to you.

    If you have to pick one to buy I'd kind of say it depends on the types of projects you do. I'm currently enjoying both programs a lot.
     
  14. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Location:
    los angeles
    #14
    FCPX getting better and better with every release. They've done a lot in the past year, I can't wait to see how it evolves a year from now.
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    coder12

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    #15
    I can't agree more, but somehow, some way, people will still complain :(
     
  16. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    #16
    The combination of hardware uncertainty and major debacle finally led many studios to bid farewell to apple and fcp. Will they continue to attract individual users? Sure. But they already alienated their core. Too little too late. People will keep some iMacs around to convert legacy files and deal with archives. Unless apple drops an absolute atom bomb on the workstation market I doubt they're going to win many back.
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Location:
    los angeles
    #17
    This just isn't true. There are a lot of places still using v7. I haven't seen any post houses switch because they're not angry fanboys who switch sides. v7 still works for whatever workflow people were using a year ago.

    FCPX still has a ways to go before it gets more consideration, but it is getting a lot closer. Perhaps in another year.
     
  18. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #18
    This has been my experience as well. Most everyone has asked me about FCX but mostly as a curiosity. They are perfectly happy with FCP7 for now.

    What Apple does with FCX2 is what really matters. That's when all those editors will finally sit down and decide what to do.

    Right now it's not looking good for Apple, but few have actually made a decision yet. Apple has about a year to impress them, I think.
     
  19. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Texas
    #19
    Ya, especially since Apple uses the Mac Pro to show off FCPX. Oh wait...
    http://images.apple.com/finalcutpro/images/hero.png
    http://images.apple.com/finalcutpro/whats-new/images/dual_viewers.jpg
    http://images.apple.com/finalcutpro/whats-new/images/red_camera.jpg
    http://images.apple.com/finalcutpro/what-is/images/revolutionary_magnetic.jpg

    Apple never once uses the Mac Pro to show off their most hardware intensive application. Sure, you might say who cares. But that is the closest thing they have to a professional application and they show it off on laptops. Face it, Apple doesn't care about the professional market. They are waiting to update the Mac Pro in 2013. That means a 3 year gap between updates. No company who actually cares about a specific type of customer will refuse them new products, new CPUs, or new GPUs for that long because if they do, those customers will switch to another platform. Time is money, and people can't just wait forever for a faster Mac Pro when they need to get work done. They just go to someone else that will provide the power they need. And not to mention the 2013 Mac Pro update could totally suck. It could just be a slight bump to bring on current I/O options as well as a minor spec bump. The Mac Pro doesn't even come with proper GPUs. No professional GPU is standard. The base GPU is a 5770, a low end gaming card, and a 5870, a mid range gaming card. The Evergreen GPU family, 5870 and 5770, are now over 3 years old and Apple has not even touched them. That's pathetic. And if we are waiting til 2013 for a Mac Pro update, that means the GPUs will be nearing 4 years old. And Apple could easily update just the GPUs and have pro customers buy them by themselves. But they don't. If Apple really wanted to cater to the professionals, they would have Quadros or Firepros standard, not gaming cards. Tell me one other company that sells workstations with gaming cards as the only options when you customize it online. Sure, you can buy a Quadro 4000, which is over 2 years old and inferior drivers compared to running one in Windows. And you can't even add one when building a Mac Pro. You have to first pay for a gaming card then you can buy a professional GPU. If Apple offered the upcoming Quadro K2000, K4000, and K5000 as the only GPU options for the 2013 Mac Pro, then maybe I would think that Apple still cares about professionals. But there is no evidence that makes me think they do.

    Rant over.
     
  20. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2012
    #20
    Anyone have tips or guide to set up a Mac mini render farm? I have given up on the Mac Pro and I love FCPX--- the render farm option seems like the best way to go.
     
  21. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    #21


    We need a smiley for the slow clap! :)
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    #22
    Download the demo and set aside some time to give it a workout. For the work I do, I like it better than 7 or Adobe. But if I had to use multiple layers or a really long format project (other than a wedding), I'd be a little hesitant. But everything I do is usually 5 minutes or less.
     
  23. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2012
    #23
    Too late

    These updates are too late! I edit at the 5th largest network in the U.S. We used to be 50% Avid 50% FCP. Ever since Apple stopped supporting FCP 7 and came out with FCP X, the network got rid of all FCP stations and it is now 100% Avid.
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2002
    Location:
    Baltimore & NYC
    #24
    Huge update. At less than the price of a plugin, this is a no-brainer for Mac editors, even if its just to play. The advancement in metadata handling is major for work groups that tie into MAM and archive systems. I'm excited. Native Redcode is sick. Background GPU rendering. This essentially is FCP X v3. Again, big big update.
     
  25. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2002
    Location:
    Lost Angeles
    #25
    Glad to see they brought back dual viewers.
     

Share This Page