Apple Reportedly Had Over a Year Left on Maps Contract with Google

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Sep 25, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Amid widespread complaints over Apple's new iOS 6 Maps app, which replaced the Google-powered application that had shipped on iOS devices since the iPhone debuted in 2007, some observers have wondered how much of the shift was due to Apple's desire to reduce its reliance upon on Google and how much might be due to other factors.

    [​IMG]


    In particular, there has been some speculation that demands by Google could also have played a role in Apple's decision, with the suggestion being that Apple may have been forced to roll out its own mapping solution a bit sooner than it had planned for if its contract with Google had been running out.

    The Verge now reports that such speculation is unfounded, with Apple and Google having had over a year left on their contract for Google's Maps app. Consequently, Apple could presumably have continued using Google's app in iOS 6 as it worked to improve its own mapping product for a launch with iOS 7 next year.
    Apple's decision apparently caught Google off-guard, as Google is reportedly still several months away from having a standalone maps app ready for submission to the App Store.

    Article Link: Apple Reportedly Had Over a Year Left on Maps Contract with Google
     
  2. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    #2
    Billions in cash pissing away money on a not needed maps app and yet still no desktops. Apple is officially my gadget only supplier.
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    United States
  4. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    #4
    If this is true, then Apple really let us (the customer) down. As a software developer, I don't see any down side (other than cost) to taking the time needed to put out a fully baked product. As far as cost goes, Apple has $100 B in the bank. I think they can afford it.
     
  5. macrumors regular

    pwhitehead

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Location:
    new jersey
    #5
    apple bit their noses to spite their face; permanently scared the apple core.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    fel10

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Location:
    Woodstock, GA USA
    #6
    Well, they should've used it. And also used that time to fix all the issues with Apple Maps before releasing it.
     
  7. macrumors 68000

    iGrip

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    #7
    What a frigging boneheaded move. The person responsible should be questioned closely. And I daresay that Steve would never have released a new service that was worse than the old.
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Location:
    Scotland
    #8
    Gotta start crowd-sourcing asap.

    The TbyT directions more than make up for any other shortcomings for me anyway.
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    Frankied22

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    #9
    That is really sad if Google Maps is still months away from being released :(
     
  10. macrumors 68020

    gmanist1000

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
  11. macrumors 68020

    sikkinixx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Location:
    Rocketing through the sky!
    #11
    Sucks for us users but Apple needs the data to start making major improvements, better to do it now (should have done it a while back) and suffer people being annoyed.
     
  12. macrumors 6502

    s8film40

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    #12
    I would think that if their contract with Google was expiring they would want to move to another option at least a year before the end of the contract. This way those who don't upgrade won't be left without a maps option at all.
     
  13. macrumors G5

    Rogifan

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    #13
    im assuming the person responsible was either Cook or Forstall. And wasn't it Steve who decided to go thermonuclear on Google? Steve deserves a lot of the blame for this IMO.
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    #14
    Android phones have had far superior native maps/navigation since day 1, and I agree with the article that the gap was widening with each release. Apple made the right move. They'll get maps right eventually.
     
  15. macrumors demi-god

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #15
    Is it hart to understand that they hate Google? No. Is it surprising that they let that hate result in a sub-par user experience like this? Yes.
     
  16. macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    #16
    It's time apple allows users to assign default apps for, web browser, email client & maps. Users that don't care can live with defaults, the others can optimise their experience.
     
  17. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2012
    #17
    Oh, wow. If this is true, then Apple really screwed us over. What on earth were they thinking? :eek:
    Who cares about turn-by-turn directions or fancy 3D-buildings when your core data is so broken?
     
  18. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Location:
    down on the upside
    #18
    google should work out a free deal with apple to allow google maps on the app store, and charge $1 dollar for it. when they rake in a few million dollars from the sale they won't need to say anything more on the subject and apple will continue to look like numbnuts for making this short-side anti-customer move.

    disclaimer: i'm no fanboy (of anything) and i own an iphone 5. google maps is just better and more accurate.
     
  19. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    #19
    Same. Maybe its cause I'm from Canada but it seems to work ok for me. I'm only on the 4 though so no idea if that 3D stuff is wonky.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    #20
    Presumeably the fact that IOS5 still uses google maps proves there must still be some active contract in place anyway else maps in io5 would stop working?
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    #21
    That's exactly what Apple wanted! They didn't want people to be able to download an alternative...
     
  22. Guest

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Location:
    Japan
    #22
    Didn't Google also start charging for use of their map service? That is why iPhoto doesn't use it anymore, no?
     
  23. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Location:
    USA
    #23
    You know I'm happy about what happened with Maps because Apple won't let my phone have all the feature...

    Thanks Apple for saving me from a bigger disappointment!!! ;)
     
  24. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    #24
    They should not sell their customers short, just to take a jab at Google. That's bad business.
     
  25. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Location:
    Sunnyvale CA USA
    #25
    That's good, because you don't have any choice.
     

Share This Page