This is nothing new. For years now the 8 GB devices have been the ones to his this price point of $0 on contract.
The cost of manufacturing an iPhone also hasn't changed, even with new models over the years. Apple's decided profit margin has not changed either.
While I do agree with you, to some extent, that it is time for 8 GB to be replaced by 16 GB at their relevant price points, the problem is how the multiples effect the rest of the lineup......as you and I would expect, Apple has established it's $100 increments for doubling storage. This may be easy to cope with at 8 & 16 GB, but get up to 32, 64 and 128.....those levels are not ready to see the same $100 price reduction.
Therefor, the bottom has to suffer until the top can come down too.
well sometimes what has been established has to be torn down for something new to begin.
both the ipads offer 4 different storage capacities and $100 increment between each one so if it can be done there then why not iphone? the memory in the ipad is reported to range from $9-$60 (16-124) so there is definitely room.
offer users the chance to add their own storage space.
the world is not as limited as apologists (not saying you) want to make it out to be.
i just find this a desperate half assed kinda move.
8gb is still a massive amount of storage for most people and will more than fit their needs with the power of iCloud behind every iOS device.
I honestly think current storage in all iOS devices is excessively generous and should be scaled back to boost profitability and help Apple fund future R&D. I only use a few gigs on my devices and could comfortably live within the 8gb world, and I'm an extreme power user!
lack of profits are certainly not stopping apple funding r&d. but if you think they are suffering im sure they would accept a monthly check from you.