Apple Says U.S. Supreme Court Should Reject Samsung's Appeal Request

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Feb 4, 2016.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    In December, Samsung asked the United States Supreme Court to hear a final appeal in its ongoing patent battle with Apple, which would potentially nullify a $548 million settlement awarded to Apple. In a lengthy document filed with the court this afternoon (via Foss Patents), Apple urges the Supreme Court to deny Samsung's request, accusing the company of raising issues that do not "deserve review" in an effort to prolong court proceedings.

    [​IMG]

    Samsung has claimed that the jury did not adequately understand the patents in question because members weren't provided with enough explanation by the court. The South Korean company has also suggested the case has wider implications that could encourage design patent trolls, an assertion Apple refers to as a "doomsday warning" based on "extreme hypotheticals."
    Apple goes on to say that Samsung has had its day in court and while the litigation is "high-profile," it is "legally unexceptional" and Samsung has not presented a legitimate reason as to why the court should prolong it.

    While Apple doesn't feel Samsung's case is worth the Supreme Court's attention, Facebook, Google, and other technology companies have all urged the court to take on Samsung's appeal to overturn the ruling in Apple's favor. A major concern is the amount that Samsung was forced to pay for its design patent infringement -- nearly $400 million -- and the implication it has for similar disputes in the future.

    Samsung has already paid the agreed upon $548 million settlement to Apple, but should the Supreme Court take on the case and rule in Samsung's favor, Apple would be required to pay back the money. Samsung's Supreme Court appeal was a last ditch effort, and should the Supreme Court refuse to hear the case, Samsung will not be able to recoup its money, putting an end to a patent battle that's been going on since 2012.

    Article Link: Apple Says U.S. Supreme Court Should Reject Samsung's Appeal Request
     
  2. IGI2 macrumors regular

    IGI2

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    #2
    Comments to this article should be placed in some political section.
     
  3. Peepo macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    #3
    Yes they should so they can use it to pay VirnetX.
     
  4. LordVic macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Location:
    Ontario
    #4
    No .. really? Apple doesn't want this appealed? NO WAI!??!!?!?

    also, accusing others of not being innovators BECAUSE of stealing designs seems a little rich only days after Apple gets blasted in court for willful patent infringement, and hvae lost several other expensive cases in the last year

    Yes. THe system is broken. Yes, everyone is stealing off eachother.

    But Apple's reason for rejection of the court case is just posturing. They don't have a good excuse not to go to appeal. But, they're just doing their jobs and they HAVE to say they don't want an appeal, cause.. Lawyers
     
  5. Rhonindk macrumors 68000

    Rhonindk

    #5
    Did Samsung "infringe"? Yes. However the results are a bit steep. I don't buy my smartphones based on how an icon looks.
     
  6. vertsix macrumors 65816

    vertsix

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    #6
    I can't believe these are still going on.

    Both sides are copying ideas. Just call it quits already. Geez.
     
  7. Chuck Kostalnick macrumors demi-god

    Chuck Kostalnick

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2015
    Location:
    San Fransisco, California
    #7
    The point is that they ripped off the "Look and Feel" of a product, which is one way people are persuaded to buy something.
     
  8. mountain macrumors 6502

    mountain

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    #8
    This is silly. They should end this once and for all.
     
  9. Mitch1984 macrumors 6502

    Mitch1984

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Location:
    Telford
    #9
    Apple get sued enough. Why only be sued and not sue.
     
  10. bboucher790 macrumors 6502a

    bboucher790

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    #10
    Samsung Says Apple Says U.S. Supreme Court Should Reject Samsung's Appeal Request.
     
  11. Rhonindk macrumors 68000

    Rhonindk

    #11
    Along with every TV in existence and my OTC drugs in Walmart and.....
    Sorry, look and feel at that level is a stretch. JMO
     
  12. MH01 macrumors G3

    MH01

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    #12
    10 years from now this will still be dragging on......
     
  13. pat500000 macrumors 68040

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #13
    Apple is ....what does Arnold usually say about cry baby? Gurly girl. Apple... U need to man up and stop being patent troll
     
  14. Tech198 macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Location:
    Australia, Perth
    #14
    It is when u consider it been on since 2012.

    - Check patents exist
    - if yes, then claim gimzo/tech whatever as sole patent of said company..

    Thing is no one even checks, which is why u have all this battles going on when "hey buster, i have a right to that..
     
  15. rdlink Suspended

    rdlink

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Location:
    Out of the Reach of the FBI
    #15
    Wait. You mean that Apple doesn't want this case to be heard by the Supreme Court? What a shock!
     
  16. LordVic macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Location:
    Ontario
    #16
    Its like a party and everyone's invited!

    just found their excuse why the appeal shouldn't be heard to be rich coming from Apple.

    Let the Appeal be heard. If Apple is so convinced that their patents are legit, than the Appeal will likely go nowhere.
     
  17. Mw0103 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2014
    #17
    There is no automatic right to appeal to SCOTUS here. Samsung filed a request that another appeal be heard, and Apple is arguing that there is no novel issue of law in this case. Apple is arguing that SCOTUS should treat this case like the other 99% of cases they will decline to hear this year.
     
  18. samcraig macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #18
    All I can say to the headline is LOLOLOLOLOL... of course Apple thinks the case shouldn't be heard.
     
  19. Bubba Satori macrumors 601

    Bubba Satori

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Location:
    B'ham
  20. apolloa macrumors 604

    apolloa

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    Time, because it rules EVERYTHING!
    #20
    THIS is front page news???

    I think I could have predicted what Apple would say without reading the story....

    How about something more useful like new MacBook Pro rumors?
     
  21. iansilv macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    #21
    That's so weird. I figured Apple would be all like "Yeah Supreme Court- grant them their appeal!"
     
  22. Thunderhawks macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    #22
    At least Diana!
     
  23. blackcrayon macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    #23
    You're dismissing it with a shrug, yet it has potential to be heard by the supreme court? Sounds like look and feel isn't simply a "stretch" or it wouldn't have gotten this far.
     
  24. tooltalk macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2015
    Location:
    NY, NY
    #24
    " putting an end to a patent battle that's been going on since 2012."

    whatever happened to the trade dress claim that the appeals court remanded last year? That's still on, isn't it?
     
  25. Wowereit macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Location:
    Germany
    #25
    Could someone explain to me why they have sued especially Samsung and not any other OEM or Google?
     

Share This Page