Apple Seeds OS X Mavericks 10.9.3 Build 13D28 to Developers

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Mar 28, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Apple today seeded build 13D28 of OS X 10.9.3 to developers, a little over one week after releasing the third OS X 10.9.3 beta, build 13D21 and three weeks after the first 10.9.3 beta. The beta is available through the Software Update mechanism in the Mac App Store as well as through the Mac Dev Center.

    [​IMG]
    Apple is currently asking developers to focus on Graphics Drivers and Audio. As was discovered with the first beta, 10.9.3 adds new support for 4K displays, offering "Retina" resolutions that improve readability along with support for 60Hz output from the Retina MacBook Pro.

    Article Link: Apple Seeds OS X Mavericks 10.9.3 Build 13D28 to Developers
     
  2. macrumors 6502a

    ZacNicholson

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Location:
    Indiana
  3. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Location:
    Seattle
    #3
    Still waiting for working GMail....

    Be nice to check my iPhone's GMail account, and then when I go to my iMac have my mail actually be read there, too. You know, like IMAP should work? Used to work just fine in Mountain Lion, so not sure what Apple changed to have it not work in Mavericks, despite whatever non-standard IMAP implementation Google uses.

    Please, Apple. Think of the children.
     
  4. macrumors 68040

    Goldfrapp

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
    #4
    I look forward to 10.10 DP and iOS-ification of the system.
     
  5. macrumors newbie

    MARKBOARD

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2014
    #5
    hahaha me too but Apple had changed its way to release OS betas since Mountain Lion, i guess so :apple:
     
  6. macrumors 68000

    MartinAppleGuy

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2013
    #6
    Does OSX have the drivers for the 700 series Nvidia cards (like the GT 750m, 780m...)? Not sure if this was long ago, or if these GPU's are running on the 600 series drivers. Anyone know?
     
  7. macrumors member

    bekiil

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Location:
    Northern Norway
    #7
    I am wondering when they will start working on OS 11, and what they will name it.
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Location:
    Sweden
    #8
    I've noticed that since upgrading to 10.9.3, Blizzard games (Starcraft 2 and Diablo III) run poorly with my Retina Macbook Pro. Anyone else experiencing inferior gaming performance?
     
  9. Nunyabinez, Mar 28, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2014

    macrumors 65816

    Nunyabinez

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Location:
    Provo, UT
    #9
    OS X is a brand. It's like saying "when will they change the name of the iPhone?"

    OS X was a play on words (it's pronounced Oh Ess Ten) because Apple was on version 9.x of the Mac operating system.

    When Steve Jobs returned from NeXt (notice the capital X) he brought the Unix-based operating system that they had been developing.

    OS X wasn't called OS 10 because it was a completely new kernel based on Unix. So the play on works was to call it Oh Ess Ten but write is as OS X to signify that it was the operating system following 9.x but was Unix based.

    So, unless there is a brand new kernel that gets introduced, the name will never change from OS X. We are currently on OS X 10.9.2. You would pronounce this Oh Ess Ten, Ten point Nine point Two. The next major release will be either OS X 10.10, or it could be OS X 11.0 (unlikely). There will be no OS 11.
     
  10. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    #10
    Will they fix "Share to">"Airdrop" functionality?

    It's been broken in all apps in Mavericks up to this point. I opened a case with  support and they confirmed existence of the bug. :confused:
     
  11. macrumors 68040

    Orlandoech

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #11
    Love your post. Thanks for the info. Being serious FYI.
     
  12. macrumors member

    JetLaw

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    #12
    I still think that the successor of OSX will be called xOS (starting with version 11.0), which brings the naming convention into conformity with iOS. Apple has already shown a willingness to re-brand an OS when they adopted the "iOS" moniker for the then-extant "iPhone OS".
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    #13
    read it out loud and you will realise why xOS won't happen :)
     
  14. Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #14
    They've really amped up the build frequency, I'm not sure if that's a good sign or a bad sign
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    bbfc

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Location:
    Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
    #15
    Not this again!

    As said above, OS X is a brand name.

    ----------

    Er, no.
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    #16
    I could see it being named "OS Xi", which would be 11 in roman numerals, still keeping the X. =) or Xi OS.
     
  17. macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #17
    No question they're working on 10.10 already in house. External beta testers could see it at WWDC in June or any time before that.
     
  18. macrumors 68020

    bbfc

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Location:
    Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
    #18
    Very interesting post.

    Plus they don't even use the version number anymore really. It's all about the name.

    ----------

    Now it's just getting silly.
     
  19. macrumors 601

    Icaras

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Location:
    California, United States
    #19
    Actually, I wish they would have kept it as Mac OS X.
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    Mike MA

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Location:
    Germany, Europe
    #20
    Getting a bit boring at the moment, so bring it on :D
     
  21. macrumors 6502

    sshhoott

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    #21
    Would someone please post a list of the Graphics Driver versions in this release to settle my anxiety issue? :D
     
  22. macrumors 603

    bedifferent

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Location:
    NY
    #22
    It's been a bad sign, for me and many others. Before 10.7, OS X 10.X development varied between 1 ½ to 2 ½ years with biweekly or weekly releases that required downloading a .dmg from the developer site, burning the image to a DVD, wiping the system and installing a "clean" OS. This allowed for improved debugging by eliminating any possible third party app "contamination" (10.7+ releases have proved difficult to properly isolate any system matters), and allowed Apple more time to "get it right" before release. Of course not all 10.X first releases were stellar, but they were far better than the current annual release cycle to match iOS. There is no need to rush out annual OS overhauls, especially as we're just on 10.9.3 beta. By the time iOS is released it may be .5 or .6.

    Personally, while Craig Federighi is an excellent engineer, nothing beats the work Bertrand Serlet did while SVP of OS X engineering. I still believe 10.5/6 are the best OS X releases to date (and before the "Serlet was involved with 10.7, he was not, he was already on his way out the door to Parallels 2009-2010, 10.7 was all Federighi).

    Ditto
     
  23. macrumors 68040

    Watabou

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Location:
    United States
    #23
    It looks like they took out the amount of memory used by the GPU. And they left out an extra space as you can see:

    The system report app still shows the amount of memory used though, and it takes up 1.5GB of system memory, like with the previous build.
     

    Attached Files:

  24. macrumors 6502

    SarcasticJoe

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Location:
    Finland
    #24
    You can go on about that like you usually do until the cows come home, but the reality is that you don't design things like Operating Systems in the fashion that you ship a version and then have a meeting where you decide on what you're going to work on in the next version.

    Instead you have long range plans that go for years ahead. When one version ships, the feature set for the next one is pretty much locked at that point. If you worked on one version up until launch or close to it, you've generally been part of planning the one after that as well as whatever comes after that. Just go read up some Apple history and you'll see that that's the way they plan OS development.

    Also, I don't see why people like to moan about how great 10.5 was... It made OSX considerably heavier to run (bye bye everything but the really last of the G4 machines and G5's) and had a ton of bugs. I personally like to call it Apple's Vista considering that disaster was pretty recent at the time. Sure, 10.6 fixed a lot of things, but I still consider it a massive service pack as reflected by the now much lower price.
     
  25. macrumors 6502a

    Pentad

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Location:
    Indiana
    #25
    I too am a fan of Bertrand Serlet. I thought 10.6 was the amazing OS for the time of its release. I had a top of the MBP and added 8 GB (a lot for the time - I think we spent nearly a grand on the memory) and ran 10.6 doing some heavy development projects. 10.6 just screamed. It was just a well-tuned, solid, extremely efficient OS.

    -P
     

Share This Page