Apple Tested USB Hard Disk Support for 2012 AirPort Express

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 27, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Apple may have considered including USB hard drive support in the AirPort Express initially released in June of 2012, according to an early support manual unearthed by French site Journal Du Lapin (via iPhone in Canada).

    Available in PDF format, the older manual references a section suggesting a USB hard disk or USB hub could be connected to the AirPort Express, allowing all computers on the network to access those devices.

    [​IMG]
    These references are not found in the final product's manual [PDF], which only includes a section on connecting a USB printer to the device. USB hard disk compatibility would have potentially allowed the lower-cost AirPort Express to function in the same way as the more expensive AirPort Extreme, suggesting Apple possibly once considered merging these two products before making the decision to release the AirPort Express without external hard drive compatibility.

    While Apple's AirPort Extreme retails for $199 and includes the ability to connect to a USB hard drive that can be accessed by all computers on the network for sharing and storing files, the AirPort Express, priced $100 less at $99, remains a no-frills entry level WiFi solution for consumers for the time being.

    Article Link: Apple Tested USB Hard Disk Support for 2012 AirPort Express
     
  2. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #2
    I wish!

    That'd be a great way to be able to network drives within homes as most consumers are looking to drop Airport Extreme prices! :mad:
     
  3. macrumors 601

    Yvan256

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Location:
    Canada
    #3
    That's a shame

    Even with that functionality, the Airport Extreme is a cleaner, more integrated solution so most people would have bought the Extreme anyway.
     
  4. macrumors 601

    Icaras

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Location:
    California, United States
    #4
    It would have also been nice for Apple to include Airplay and stereo audio output on the Extreme and Time Capsule.
     
  5. Quu
    macrumors 68000

    Quu

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    #5
    I have one of these, great product. Would be wonderful if I could attach a USB hard disk to it for time machine backups!
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    arkmannj

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Location:
    UT
    #6
    Copy that...

    I've also thought a combo AppleTV+Airport device would be useful. At least for the house I'm currently in, it turns out that my WiFi and AppleTV sit within a couple feet from each other.
     
  7. macrumors 68040

    Orlandoech

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #7
    Hey, I am in UT too, Murray/Cottonwood Heights. Where are you approx?
     
  8. macrumors newbie

    TheDoctor1010

    Joined:
    May 27, 2014
    Location:
    Northern Illinois
    #8
    totally agree but how would they sell Apple TV then? That's what I had to do to stream music. Oh well...
     
  9. macrumors G3

    Kilamite

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    #9
    Configured right, it might've given okay performance. I wouldn't expect anything great though, smaller antennas for one.
     
  10. macrumors 6502

    jmh600cbr

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
  11. macrumors 6502

    street.cory

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    #11
    It pisses me off that they crippled the Airport Express. I imagine a firmware update would allow network disk access from an Airport Express.
     
  12. macrumors 601

    Icaras

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Location:
    California, United States
    #12
    The Apple TV would still retain it's strength of being able to Airplay both audio and video. The Airport Express allows only audio because of just the 3.5mm stereo output which is nice when you have an available stereo system near it.

    But I guess it's sort of getting insignificant now anyway since you can now get amplifiers and receivers with airplay built in.
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    lazyrighteye

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2002
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    #13
    Yes please!
    Hands down the best form factor yet.
    Would like ATV/AEBS combo in current ATV form factor, express in wall plug form factor.
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2007
    #14
    Huh?

    Functionally, the only thing the Extreme has is extra ethernet ports.
     
  15. macrumors G3

    Kilamite

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    #15
    Bigger, more powerful antennas too.
     
  16. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Location:
    Sweden
    #16
    I believe the Extreme also has Gigabit Ethernet in those ports while the Express doesn't. Plus the Wifi is up to ac standard. So at least on paper it's faster.
     
  17. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC CANADA
    #17
    How can you make a claim like "most consumers are looking to drop Airport Extreme prices", and be mad about it? Just because there are cheaper routers on the market doesn't mean that the Airport routers are equal on all fronts, but at a higher price. The hardware and software is generally superior to many third-party options, even from a pure integration with Macs and iOS devices standpoint.

    Apple is a hardware company and needs to make money. The "bargain" they offer (and there is one!) is the longevity of their hardware and software. You get more than you paid for it, easy. If you want a cheaper router, get a cheaper router.

    ----------

    Crippled? That's a bold claim. You do realize that these devices are mini-computers, right? They do a lot of work beyond just routing your network traffic. The Airport Express is a tiny device, and to cram even more functionality and demands into it may have exceeded processing and heat thresholds beyond Apple's quality of standard. What if they decided to roll out that Network Disk feature to the Express and it performed poorly? How pissed would you be then?
     
  18. macrumors 601

    Yvan256

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Location:
    Canada
    #18
    "USB hard disk compatibility would have potentially allowed the lower-cost AirPort Express to function in the same way as the more expensive AirPort Extreme."

    But yeah, I was mixing up the Airport Express/Extreme with the Time Capsule.
     
  19. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    #19
    How about adding Airplay to Airport Extreme instead of making people double dip to get a Airport Express at the same would be the smartest move for Apple.
     
  20. macrumors 6502

    ABCDEF-Hex

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Location:
    NC
    #20
    Strange story to surface now.

    Unless it hints at some hybrid Apple TV/Airport Express combo. (Just kidding)
     
  21. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    #21
    And 802.11ac
     
  22. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    #22
    I'm not sure if this is true. I have one of each at home and was looking to swap them to improve signal strength where it's needed, but from what I was able to gather from the Internet, the output signal strength is identical between the two.
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    lolkthxbai

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    #23
    And 802.11ac w/BeamForming tech plus USB HDD Access, which is what the article is all about...

    ----------

    No it's not. You have to use 802.11ac ready equipment to see the BeamForming tech advantage.
     
  24. macrumors newbie

    TheDoctor1010

    Joined:
    May 27, 2014
    Location:
    Northern Illinois
    #24
    Wouldn't that be a welcoming product! How about a Time Capsule with ATV built in?

    ----------

    True.
     
  25. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Location:
    Seattle, WA

Share This Page