Apple to Move Production of iPhone Batteries to Automated Lines

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Mar 24, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Apple is set to begin producing all iPhone batteries on automated production lines starting later this year, according to a report from DigiTimes. The move is being done to reduce manpower demand and to allow the company to shift its supply chain resources towards production efforts on other parts.
    The move will likely help Apple with iPhone production going forward, as company supplier Pegatron will reportedly be starting production on the iPhone 6 in the second quarter of this year at its new Kunsahn, China plant. Moving the production of iPhone batteries to automated lines may also help Apple avoid manufacturing defects like ones found in a small number of iPhone 5s last year.

    Apple's next-generation iPhone will likely be unveiled in the fall, and has been rumored to launch with two different models including one with a 4.7-inch display and one with a 5.7-inch display. The iPhone 6 could also feature a durable sapphire display, with other rumors pointing to a thinner chassis and bezel-free design.

    Article Link: Apple to Move Production of iPhone Batteries to Automated Lines
     
  2. locoboi187, Mar 24, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2014

    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    #2
    I wish they also invested their time in researching ways to improve batteries.
     
  3. macrumors 6502

    sputnikv

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    #3
    i was under the impression that the mac pro was not 'automated' as it involved laborers assembling the units together
     
  4. macrumors 601

    goobot

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Location:
    long island NY
    #4
    If the iMac is made by a machine why isn't it made in america/country it is sold to?. Wouldn't that make it cheaper due to less shipping?
     
  5. macrumors 603

    Michaelgtrusa

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Location:
    Everywhere And Nowhere
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    #6
    I would have assumed that it was already automated to be honest.
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2010
    #7
    What an idiotic comment!
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    iChrist

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Location:
    3 countries for tax benefit
    #8
    Too bad Apple can't invest more of this ingenuity toward improving the battery life and size, instead of focusing on automating a subpar product.
     
  9. macrumors demi-god

    Gav2k

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    #9
    Apple like many others are heavily invested in research and design. The issue is there is no next big thing we are at the peak of what's currently available. Hence why newer phones use less power as that is currently the only step forward.
     
  10. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    #10
    maybe i can get through an entire day with an iphone 6 doing a bit of web surfing and listening to music on half brightness and wifi without charging. Certainly can't on my 4S :'(
     
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Location:
    The Hague, NL
    #11
    My iPhone 4 still has very good battery life, after many years of service :) Kudos to Apple for the battery.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2002
    #12
    They do.
     
  13. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    #13
    Maybe that's what they discussed with Tesla?

    To work together on battery improvement and new technologies?
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    tmanto02

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Location:
    Earth
    #14
    Cause Apple aren't already investing millions in doing exactly that already. Do you honestly think that they are doing nothing to try and improve battery technology?
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    Twimfy

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Location:
    UK
    #15
    Yup, it'll save them a fortune and it's unlikely we'll see the benefit.
     
  16. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2002
    #16
    Why all the Apple hate at MacRumors?
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    Lone Deranger

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    #17
    Consider your wish granted then.
     
  18. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2014
    #18
    It's not Apple hate, it's Socialist love where profit is evil.
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    RobertMartens

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    #19
    You mean Emmanuel Labor, I just call him Manny.
     
  20. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    #20
    Clearly, you aren't as popular nor do you spend your time playing Flappy Bird on your phone like everyone else.
     
  21. macrumors regular

    CausticSoda

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2014
    Location:
    Abu Dhabi
    #21
    Huge amounts of research is done in this field, whether by Apple or by companies that they use to provide technology. If we are talking battery life, I wish they would make their devices just a bit less thin to enable a larger battery and hence a longer life. The battery life on my 5S is just not good enough, as far as I am concerned. There is nothing wrong with the battery technology. Rather, it is too small due to Apple's obsession with thinness. I hate going out for the day, perhaps travelling abroad, and having to think about rationing what I can afford to do with it if the battery is to survive the day. That really is just silly.
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    dragje

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Location:
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    #22
    Socialist don't think profit is evil.

    ----------

    I agree, the battery life of iPhone is ridicules low. I always using an battery case, in this way when I go out for a long walk an iPhone 5 can last for about 1 and a half day. Then it needs to be recharged once more. Without the battery case I can't rely on the battery being able to track my long walks, taking foto's on the way and listening to the radio using 3G as well.
     
  23. macrumors 65816

    musika

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Location:
    New York
    #23
    Here's a temporary solution: make the phone a millimeter or two thicker so that you can fit a bigger battery in there. I don't see why this isn't a priority.
     
  24. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    #24
    Me too. Some iPhone batches had the worst batteries I've ever seen in a mobile phone:

    - 3GS and the swelling batteries - see my own shots at http://www.flickr.com/photos/33448355@N07/sets/72157633931601917/

    - iPhone 5 and the batteries completely dying after half a year - same happened to me.

    So much for "legendary" Apple "quality"...

    ----------

    Seeing is believing... too many iPhone models / batches were plagued by substandard or downright cr@ppy batteries...

    ----------

    "Form over functionality"

    ----------

    6 hours' battery life with a less than 4-year-old battery? That isn't very good... for example, my 2007 Nokia N95 still delivers way better battery life with its original battery.

    Yes, Nokia has always used far better-quality batteries than Apple. No wonder they don't swell / die on users after half a year / deliver 6 hours of life after 4 years.

    ----------

    Well, given the cr@ppy batteries Apple uses (used in several batches), I certainly wouldn't think so. Nokia has always used far better ones.
     
  25. macrumors 68000

    Cuban Missles

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    Location:
    My heart is in Camagüey, the rest in the USA
    #25
    I think that this is a new push for Tim. Eliminate as much of the Labor force as possible through automation. Given all the negative press with the Chinese labor force - long hours, suicide, etc - I think this makes sense. Initially the cost of automation is probably higher, but they have the cash to get it done. Final assembly then is the only thing for which manual labor will still be required. Given the millions of phone, that is still a sizable workforce so it is still probably not effective to bring it back to the USA, but one can hope.
     

Share This Page