Apple to Start Record Label with Jay-Z and Beyonce?

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jul 15, 2007.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]

    Starting in April 2007 there were rumors from MediaTakeOut that rapper Jay-Z was leaving the Def Jam Recordings record label to create a new "super label" with singer Beyonce.
    Jay-Z is a popular rapper and current president and CEO of Def Jam -- a record label owned by Universal Music.

    At the time, Jay-Z was reportedly shopping this new "super label" around with the major record labels "and to Apple - who [was] very interested in doing business".

    Now, Moli.com is claiming that "an inside industry source" says that its a done deal.
    Coincidentally, Universal Music recently let their long term contract lapse with Apple for iTunes music distribution and have gone on a short term "at will" distribution deal.

    The reliability of these sites is unknown, but published for interest as well as due to the existance of a historical rumor trail.


    Article Link
     
  2. macrumors 68040

    koobcamuk

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    #2
    Sounds utterly awful.
     
  3. macrumors 68040

    Scarlet Fever

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2005
    Location:
    Bookshop!
    #3
    please Apple, don't get involved with them. Their 'music' is utter drivel.
     
  4. macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2007
    Location:
    USA
    #4
    begins to burst out in laughter and disbelief.

    Seriously, people, how could you believe this? MR should'nt've even posted then.
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Location:
    Australia
    #5
    Wow, this is the strangest rumour ever! :confused:
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    kymac

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Location:
    portland
    #6
    yea.. but theyre really popular.. so making a deal with them would be smart of apple.. because its already known that beyonce and jay z have a large fanbase that is willing to purchase their products. so just because their music isnt appealing to you, doesnt mean its a bad move on apples part.
     
  7. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    #7
    Don't mind either artist, but if this were true Apple is proving why there are so many issues lately.No focus on computing, just media/gadget ventures:(
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Location:
    Europe
    #8
    I'd rather see Apple in movies or games but it'd be good to see them branch out with a music label. This sort of thing would bring them better access to resources, and financially stabalise them even further so they can continue to try far out products.

    But Jay-Z? Man, Def Jam is an institution, with an organic history. If Jay-Z were to leave it I'd rather him create something fresh, raw and true to hip hop.

    But I guess now we have Blacksmith.
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Location:
    UK
    #9
    Beyonce and Apple. This better be true. :D:D:D She can be the new face of Apple.
     
  10. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #10
    No focus at all, only non-computing stuff! Although... I heard they have a new Mac OS "Leopard" of some kind... and moved their whole computer line to new chips... and just came out with new LED laptops... and are expected to have more new Macs soon...

    I'm not sure, though :)
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    WildPalms

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Location:
    Honolulu, HI
    #11
    This (if true) could actually be a very canny move on Apple's part. We'll have to wait and see which direction it takes.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2001
    #12
    This would definitely hurt their relationship with other labels in the iTMS, but also explain why Universal started crying and ran home with their toys (music). Since Jay is (or was?) distributed by Universal, this definitely has to be a coup. Jay was already complaining last year about declining sales and many in the Hip-Hop community railed against him on how certain eagerly anticipated albums (Nas - Hip-Hop Is Dead) were pushed back for more commercial releases (Jay-Z - Kingdom Come). This digital label would solve most of that.
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    bluebomberman

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Location:
    Queens, NYC
    #13
    I don't see why Apple would even want to think about having their own music label. And even if they want in on the action, doing so with Jay-Z -- a guy that gloats about his expensive lifestyle -- won't do much to change the image of the big labels as soulless corporate entities that exploit and steal from artists.

    If Apple goes through with this, they're going to start looking a lot like Sony.
     
  14. arn
    macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #14
    disregarding whether you believe its true or not... would it really surprise people?

    What better way to promote iTunes (and therefore iPod, iPhone) then digital only distribution of popular artists.

    Now, it may piss off the record labels (which it may have pissed of Universal already), but do they have a choice but to distribute on iTunes?

    And as for choice of artists... it makes sense to have young-demographic users. translation: people who are far more likely to be online.

    arn
     
  15. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    #15
    I don't get why people would rate this "negative". As we just saw with Universal, big Record Labels are not fit for the digital age, and they don't care for the experience of their consumers. To bypass them and offer a deal directly by Apple seems not only what many artists would wish, but rather necessary to get some independence of those dying behemoths.

    By the way, FSJ hinted something like this lately, so it must be true....
     
  16. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    #16
    It's the Apple in the building!

    [​IMG]
     
  17. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    #17
    Universal and DRM

    The strange thing is that Universal is trying to play hard-ball with Apple, when Apple is the only large music retailer selling music with DRM. Its like they want to shoot themselves in the foot. CD sales would be declining even faster than the already are if they playing field was equalized with respect to DRM (i.e., Apple has to include it while WaMart, Target and Best Buy do not).

    As for Def Jam records, I wonder if more and more of these subsidiaries are going to think: "What do I need Universal for?" I could see this just opening the flood gates.
     
  18. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2001
    #18
    A new label with a former computer company that makes most of the tools that the artists of your genre and generation use to create and listen to music and that would digitally distribute your wares all over the world is fresh, raw and true to Hip-Hop!

    I'm originally from the Bronx and Hip-Hop is about taking all these global cultural influences and forging into new mediums that democratically provide access to art and making art. We didn't have instruments and took our mouths and record players and made music. No paintbrushes or canvas and made all of NYC (and then the world) our art studio. This is just acknowledgment for the marketing force that Hip-Hop is.

    By the way, what is Blacksmith?
     
  19. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Location:
    Palo Alto, CA
    #19
    I think that this is an interesting idea. Apple knows a couple of things that the large media companies don't. One of them is that the future of media is digital. From movies to TV shows to music, all of these will be delivered digitally and on demand. iTunes has proven that people want to buy music online. So what's next? Helping people discover new music to further drive sales.

    The idea is simple. Apple takes control of the content and sells it and GIVES SOME AWAY FREE to users of iTunes. People on iTunes can jump on every day and see what's new, get free tracks, buy exclusive new tracks and find new bands that are in the same genre as the bands they like.

    The difference between an apple label and say BMG is that Apple can cut out the radio stations, MTV, etc and promote their bands through iTunes and any other way they see fit. They have a user base. They don't need MTV or corporate radio which are both failing markets now. Neither of those mediums are about new music anymore. They churn out the same crap every year and people are tired of it. MTV doesn't even play music videos very much anymore. It's a joke. The reason is that people just jump on YouTube now to watch videos, they don't need to watch MTV for 2 hours waiting for that new hot video to come on.

    In a short attention span world, Apple can kick the asses of the big studios because they can keep costs low and promote in many ways online.

    Just a thought. I don't know about this rumor however but I do think that it at least makes sense on the surface.
     
  20. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2001
    #20
    It's funny. The record labels hate that their retail channels are controlled by just a few companies: Walmart, Apple and the like, but want to limit access to music at the same time.
     
  21. macrumors 601

    Chaszmyr

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    #21
    I realize that Apple Inc and Apple Corps settled, but given that settlement would Apple Inc actually be allowed to become/start a record label themselves?
     
  22. arn
    macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #22
    It would seem so
    http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/02/05apple.html

    Seems the trademark is 100% Apple (Computer)'s to use.

    arn
     
  23. macrumors 68020

    T'hain Esh Kelch

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2001
    Location:
    Denmark
    #23
    Phew... This is gonna have a huge impact on the industry if it goes through... And I certainly believe Apple is gonna make more enemies..
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    bluebomberman

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Location:
    Queens, NYC
    #24
    Question: Won't this bring up anti-trust issues?

    Another question: Isn't this selling out?

    The big labels obviously will be disgusted, but I can also see a lot of indie labels and indie artists being very unhappy that one of their best outlets for reaching their fans is going the way of The Man. How can they compete against a Jay-Z fronted Apple music label for front page space on the iTunes store?
     
  25. macrumors 6502

    iris_failsafe

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    #25
    why would Apple do this, it doesn't make sense, Steve must know that having everything hurts Sony a lot as its record label opposes his tech branch all the time...
     

Share This Page