Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,541
30,850



Apple confirmed that all three editions of the Apple Watch will ship with 8GB of internal storage, according to 9to5Mac. Apple Watch users will be limited to up to 2GB of songs and up to 75MB of photos that are locally stored on the device and can be listened to or viewed without a paired iPhone. Songs can be synced using the Apple Watch companion app on compatible iPhones running iOS 8.2 or later.

Watch-White.jpeg

2GB of music works out to anywhere from 200 to 500 songs depending on the audio quality, while the report claims that 75MB of photos will equal to over 100 photos that are automatically compressed for reduced file size on the Apple Watch. A portion of the remaining storage capacity is likely allocated to the Apple Watch's operating system, and will store application binaries and resources when a native SDK is released.

Article Link: Apple Watch Has 8GB of Storage, Limited to 2GB for Music and 75MB for Photos
 

DDaddyx2

macrumors regular
Jan 6, 2012
100
7
Indianapolis, IN
So this thing has no audio jack. Is the idea I pair it with my bluetooth headphones, and can then listen to much through the watch rather than the phone? I wonder if/when there will be support for the Podcasts app or Spotify.
 

surfingarbo

macrumors regular
Jun 12, 2011
114
294
That sounds pretty good – A lot more than I had expected it to hold.

I can’t imagine the need for 16GB, but I suspect companies/blogs who compare smartwatches on a like-for-like basis will still use this as a comparison.
 

Tankmaze

macrumors 68000
Mar 7, 2012
1,707
351
8 GB internal with 6 GB free space... yeah right, since this watch tethered with the iphone, might as well use the iphone for music.
 

winston1236

macrumors 68000
Dec 13, 2010
1,902
319
I'm thinking that maybe this will be a product with upgrade pricing, like it you owned a Gen 1 and then you can you can upgrade to Gen 2 for less than full retail. It seems so modular with the band/face design.
 

macduke

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,141
19,677
The stainless steel Watch model should have at least 16GB and the gold Edition model should have at least 512GB because money.
 

ominx

macrumors 6502
Jun 23, 2010
356
9
So this thing has no audio jack. Is the idea I pair it with my bluetooth headphones, and can then listen to much through the watch rather than the phone? I wonder if/when there will be support for the Podcasts app or Spotify.

This would be awesome. I wouldn't load music but having podcasts on the watch would be great for me... even if I have to play them through the internal speaker.
 

Attonine

macrumors 6502a
Feb 15, 2006
744
58
Kent. UK
Need more info. As DDaddy mentioned above, no audio jack, how do we get the audio to our ears? If you go for a run or to the gym do you still need to carry your iPhone with you?
 

underkuerbis

macrumors member
Mar 14, 2011
60
75
Bremen, Germany
Ummm, wouldn't it be more feasible to pair some BT headphones with your iPhone and use the watch as a remote control?
Sure, that doesn't work independently of the phone, but since almost everything else doesn't either...
 
Last edited:

roland.g

macrumors 604
Apr 11, 2005
7,414
3,152
I personally would not want to listen to music from the watch speaker. So the only reason I can see wanting music on the watch is if it can play music to a paired bluetooth headset, which would then allow you to use just your watch and BT headphones at the gym, on a run, or in other situations without the phone present.
 

I4u

macrumors newbie
Sep 6, 2013
14
2
Cmon Beta users...get on this already so I can buy this in about 2 years...lol
 

gonzoguy24

macrumors member
Oct 31, 2010
98
24
Question

Can this play the songs over Bluetooth while I run without my phone paired and will it use GPS to track my run?
 

the8thark

macrumors 601
Apr 18, 2011
4,628
1,735
What's the point of 2GB music with no headphone socket port?
Bluetooth is not the answer here unless you consider having the watch require bluetooth headphones just like it requires an iPhone.

And I wonder how the memory (NOT the same thing as storage) is handled on the Apple Watch. Is part of the 8GB just used as memory or does the Apple Watch have some amount of dedicated memory? If so I cam't see more than 512MB of memory in it. But I could be wrong.
 

Hattig

macrumors 65816
Jan 3, 2003
1,457
92
London, UK
8 GB internal with 6 GB free space... yeah right, since this watch tethered with the iphone, might as well use the iphone for music.

Why would someone take an iPhone on their run?

(pretty much the only use-case I can think of for this feature)

I guess some people work in places that don't allow devices with cameras, they'd benefit from this.
 

swarmster

macrumors 6502a
Jun 1, 2004
641
114
It's a shame that they're artificially limiting music storage, as my only interest in the watch is as an iPod replacement. But, depending on randomization options in the companion app, it could still be manageable. Will need to hear more. (You'd think it would have come up in the first two press conferences, but maybe third time's the charm?)
 

b166er

macrumors 68020
Apr 17, 2010
2,062
18
Philly
It blows my mind that the $350 version and the $17K version have the exact same tech specs. I realize the price is directly related to the fashion factor. It's just weird to see a gadget that does the same exact job across the board regardless of price, aside from the screen size which is a surprisingly modest price increase.
 

Trik

macrumors 6502
Jan 18, 2011
370
1,176
Washington, DC
Definitely looks like you'll be able to use bluetooth headphones. It would be nice to go to the gym / for a run without my phone. The problem is, I've now grown accustomed to having a detailed GPS map of my run, which I don't believe this watch can do without a phone. So we'll be stuck bringing the phone along anyway if that's something you find value in.
 

Attonine

macrumors 6502a
Feb 15, 2006
744
58
Kent. UK
Why would someone take an iPhone on their run?

(pretty much the only use-case I can think of for this feature)

I guess some people work in places that don't allow devices with cameras, they'd benefit from this.


In the promo clip with the model running the marathon, she had her iPhone in an arm band whilst running. I think it's pretty popular! I would like to be able to leave the phone behind though.
 

Trik

macrumors 6502
Jan 18, 2011
370
1,176
Washington, DC
It blows my mind that the $350 version and the $17K version have the exact same tech specs. I realize the price is directly related to the fashion factor. It's just weird to see a gadget that does the same exact job across the board regardless of price, aside from the screen size which is a surprisingly modest price increase.

I agree, but that is fashion exactly right? Form over function? It's not like a Prada bag holds things better than Jansport.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.