Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple Watch Drops to Just 5% Share of Wearables Market as Basic Fitness Trackers 'Reign Supreme'

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,249
39,048



While the Apple Watch remains the world's best selling smartwatch, the latest data from market research firm IDC reveals basic wearables "reign supreme" as consumers gravitate towards simple, dedicated fitness devices--which also typically cost less than the Apple Watch and other smartwatches.

apple-watch-wearables-idc-3q16.jpg
Shipments in millions (Source: IDC)​

Basic wearables accounted for 85% of the market and experienced double-digit growth in the third quarter, according to IDC. Fitbit remained the leader with 23% market share, up from 21.4% a year ago, on the strength of its new Charge 2 fitness tracker. Fitbit shipped an estimated 5.3 million wearables in the quarter.

Xiaomi trailed in second as its $14.99 Mi Band is priced well below any competing wearables, allowing the Chinese company to capture 16.5% market share based on an estimated 3.8 million shipments in the quarter. Xiaomi's market share remained virtually unchanged from 16.4% a year ago.

Meanwhile, the Apple Watch captured just a 4.9% share of the broader wearables market in the quarter based on an estimated 1.1 million shipments, according to IDC. Comparatively, in the year-ago quarter, Apple had an estimated 3.9 million Apple Watch shipments for a much higher 17.5% market share.
"It's still early days, but we're already seeing a notable shift in the market," said Jitesh Ubrani senior research analyst for IDC Mobile Device Trackers. "Where smartwatches were once expected to take the lead, basic wearables now reign supreme. Simplicity is a driving factor and this is well reflected in the top vendor list as four out of five offer a simple, dedicated fitness device. Meanwhile, from a design perspective, many devices are focusing on fashion first while allowing the technology to blend in with the background."
Click to expand...
IDC attributed Apple's decline in the third quarter to an "aging lineup" and an "unintuitive user interface." Apple addressed those concerns with Apple Watch Series 2, but the second-generation models launched in mid-September and therefore did not have a full impact on the third quarter.

Apple does not officially disclose Apple Watch sales, instead grouping the device under its "Other Products" category in earnings results.

Article Link: Apple Watch Drops to Just 5% Share of Wearables Market as Basic Fitness Trackers 'Reign Supreme'
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/12/05/apple-watch-vs-wearables-idc-3q16/
Good, as it should be.

In other news Ferrari trails car market as Ford Focus sales "Reign Supreme"

(Note: This is called a joke for those people who've mathematically tried to work out which car brands are more accurately comparable to the price difference between an Apple Watch and a Xiaomi Mi band...christ)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AppleFan1998, elmateo487, kdjohn3 and 49 others
I don't understand why these things are compared. Basic fitness-only wearables are a completely different product from Apple Watch. Most of that market is not going to buy an Apple Watch instead.

Fitness tracking is 1 of 100 Apple Watch features.

Edit: This just in - 95% of refrigerator profits not going to Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppleFan1998, jeffirl, NovemberWhiskey and 34 others
AW1 was overpriced.

Apple should have gone for market share. The best advertisment is to see a friend have it and tell you how great it is. This is especially true if it is a new product category.


The user interface was horrible. They should have done something much simpler. Imagine the screen split into four quadrants, where each quadrant can either be a folder or an app. With 2-4 fast taps you could select any app. You can put the apps you use most often high in the hierarchy. That is much easier than zooming in and out with digital chrown and scrolling around among 50 apps and 95% you never use.

I also don't understand why it needs so much battery when I don't use the watch. A battery in a Tile lasts a year and it is able to poll my phone if it is lost and beep very quickly. Same mechanism can be used for notifications.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RuralJuror, DevNull0, MaximizedAction and 8 others
TurboPGT! said:
I don't understand why these things are compared. Basic fitness-only wearables are a completely different product from Apple Watch. Most of that market is not going to buy an Apple Watch instead.

Fitness tracking is 1 of 100 Apple Watch features.

Edit: This just in - 95% of refrigerator profits not going to Apple.
Click to expand...

Agreed, comparing $70 fitbits and $15 Mi Bands to $300+ Apple Watches doesn't make much sense.

In other news, $200-$500 windows laptops outsell $2400 Retina MacBook Pro.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TiquanS, jhfenton, Michael Scrip and 2 others
MacRumors said:



While the Apple Watch remains the world's best selling smartwatch, the latest data from market research firm IDC reveals basic wearables "reign supreme" as consumers gravitate towards simple, dedicated fitness devices--which also typically cost less than the Apple Watch and other smartwatches.

apple-watch-wearables-idc-3q16.jpg

Shipments in millions (Source: IDC)​

Basic wearables accounted for 85% of the market and experienced double-digit growth in the third quarter, according to IDC. Fitbit remained the leader with 23% market share, up from 21.4% a year ago, on the strength of its new Charge 2 fitness tracker. Fitbit shipped an estimated 5.3 million wearables in the quarter.

Xiaomi trailed in second as its $14.99 Mi Band is priced well below any competing wearables, allowing the Chinese company to capture 16.5% market share based on an estimated 3.8 million shipments in the quarter. Xiaomi's market share remained virtually unchanged from 16.4% a year ago.

Meanwhile, the Apple Watch captured just a 4.9% share of the broader wearables market in the quarter based on an estimated 1.1 million shipments, according to IDC. Comparatively, in the year-ago quarter, Apple had an estimated 3.9 million Apple Watch shipments for a much higher 17.5% market share.IDC attributed Apple's decline in the third quarter to an "aging lineup" and an "unintuitive user interface." Apple addressed those concerns with Apple Watch Series 2, but the second-generation models launched in mid-September and therefore did not have a full impact on the third quarter.

Apple does not officially disclose Apple Watch sales, instead grouping the device under its "Other Products" category in earnings results.

Article Link: Apple Watch Takes Just 5% Share of Wearables Market as Basic Fitness Trackers 'Reign Supreme'
Click to expand...

There is a big difference between comparing market shares in quantity vs. revenue/profit.
 
3.9 million last year and 1.1 million this year for the same quarter. That is a huge drop.

I these figures are correct they could be worrying for Apple. But at the same time what is weird is that at the same time delivery times are very long for the series 2. Could it be a production issue?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pentrix2 and Reason077
It's no surprise to see Fitbit way out in front. But the numbers from Samsung and Xaomi are pretty impressive too, when compared against Apple's.
 
I switched over from a Nike Fuelband to the Apple Watch (just under a month ago). To me, there's just no comparison. While the Nike was fine in what it did, it just didn't do enough NOR was it waterproof, as the Apple watch is. Sure, okay - people buy more of the other brands, and that's to be expected, just as more people buy Microsoft-based PCs than they do iMacs. The sales numbers don't impress so much as the functionality does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnnygee, bobob and doelcm82
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back