Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

IJ Reilly

macrumors P6
Jul 16, 2002
17,909
1,496
Palookaville
Please guys stop the Friday morning CEOing!


Take a look at Jimmie Iovine's Wikipedia page, he is the Chairman and co-founder or Interscope Records and Chairman of Interscope Geffen A & M which is part of the Universal Music Group which is the largest music corporation in the World . Also scroll down to the complete Iovine discography.

I think this is it. This deal (assuming it happens) is Apple admitting that their influence in the music business has waned since the passing of Steve. They need to bring someone on board to give them an edge, and that person is Iovine. If it's true that Beats' revenue is over $1B annually, then this is probably a better investment of $3B than having it gathering dust in short-term investments.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

bytethese

macrumors 68030
Jun 20, 2007
2,707
120
The article mentions no intellectual property worth purchasing? Aren't there PC's with "Audio by Beats" built into them? Can Apple now cut that off and make it exclusive for their Macbook Pros? Also maybe they can finally offer included headphones with the iPhone that are worth a poop?
 

Mark Booth

macrumors 68000
Jan 16, 2008
1,654
494
I haven't tried Beats music service but I have tried iTunes Radio and, frankly, it sucks. I tried REALLY hard to like iTunes Radio but it only took about 3 months before I gave up completely and went back to paying $4/month for Pandora One. MUCH better!

The biggest problem with iTunes Radio is that it plays a bunch of songs I know and want to hear, BUT, with many performed by artists I've never heard of and/or don't care to hear. I'm not the least bit interested in Creedence Clearwater Revival's interpretation of 'I Heard it through the Grapevine'! Either play Marvin Gaye's version, or don't bother.

If I choose a particular station in Pandora, 99% of the songs are what I'd like to hear. With iTunes Radio, it's 50% at best.

So, for gosh sakes, PLEASE buy a company that can show you how to do it right.

Mark
 

timtempest

macrumors newbie
Jul 30, 2011
12
0
Tokyo, Japan.
iTunes a mess

I can understand apple wanting to improve iTunes for music. There is only so much back catalogue rock albums that can be sold after all.
iTunes is just one big folder of music with everything thrown in it, mostly by majors and no meaningful way to find or be offered other tracks you may be interested in.
A visit to almost any other online music store offers vastly a vastly superior service. Juno is my preference. I like aiff files as the work nice in Traktor, I can see what others mix with a track i like, what others have purchased, what the audio file looks like, what else is on that label, what DJ has played it and what else they are playing.
I happily spend hours digging for tracks, or listening to suggestions. This is what Beats seem to realise and appreciate.
I'm sure I'm not the only guy that used to work in a record store grinning at the realization that yes, you did actually need people like us to help with your music choices didn't you.
I'd sign up to apple for just $2bn by the way.

Tim
 

hashholly

macrumors 6502
Oct 13, 2008
436
119
Im giving Apple the benefit of the doubt on this one....i can't see them spending 3 billion dollars on a company that is not worth anywhere near that for nothing.

Have a little faith.
 

cheesyappleuser

macrumors 6502a
Apr 5, 2011
557
208
Portugal
I'm not really getting the point of this deal either, but it has to be done for a reason.
Obviously not the streaming service or the headphones, that are tacky and too expensive.
It really has to be something else, so only time will tell.
 

wilhoitm

macrumors 6502a
Jul 22, 2002
819
958
So? Apple can outright buy many labels for less than 3.2B. No one man is worth that much.

Apple doesn't want to get into the Music label business, it can be a real headache dealing with a bunch of drugged up artists that crave an infinite amount of attention and have Mommy and Daddy issues!

Apple can probably make more money by improving the technology and also putting an Apple on those headphones, Beats currently controls 40% of the headphone market and they are also really big in the Hip Hop community. But again guys this deal is not about those stupid headphones!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Iovine
 

Locoboof

macrumors 65816
Jun 8, 2008
1,177
158
Bay Area,Cali
Please guys stop the Friday morning CEOing!


Take a look at Jimmie Iovine's Wikipedia page, he is the Chairman and co-founder or Interscope Records and Chairman of Interscope Geffen A & M which is part of the Universal Music Group which is the largest music corporation in the World . Also scroll down to the complete Iovine discography.


What he said....

Also,I'll take a pair of beats earbuds packaged with my iPhone 6 instead of the EarPods any day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JHankwitz

macrumors 68000
Oct 31, 2005
1,911
58
Wisconsin
OMG, I hope not. What I want is to pay a monthly or annual fee to play my iTunes stations 24/7 without any advertising. I already get way too much advertising

You already can, with iTunes Match.

Sure, but only for 2 hours at a time, then you need to manually restart it. 2
+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2... is not the same as 24/7. It's worth $$$ to me to not have to keep running to my iMac in my basement office to start it up again and again.
 

SusanK

macrumors 68000
Oct 9, 2012
1,676
2,655
Wow, Steve Jobs would have never let this happen.


No, Steve wouldn't.

Steve knew how to deliver amazing products.

Steve didn't need to throw our money at anything that walked by in an attempt to keep his day job. The job we paid him $1 per year and coverage in the employee health plan.
 

jrswizzle

macrumors 603
Aug 23, 2012
6,107
129
McKinney, TX
Lol....it's like the reaction to the 1st round of the NFL Draft last night....people making HUGE assumptions based on very little information.

-The HTC One (with Beats Audio - whatever that means) sounded killer. Those Boomsound speakers were awesome. I'd love something like that in the iPhone or iPad.

-This isn't about headphones.....for the umpteenth time.

-iTunes Radio ISN'T wildly successful. And while Beats Music isn't either, merging the two or promoting Beats might be more successful for Apple.

-Apple's music business is sinking. Iovine could be a key to resurrecting it.

While $3.2 billion isn't anything to sneeze at, its approximately 2% of Apple's CASH reserve. Meaning this isn't a MASSIVE acquisition for them. Apple isn't in the habit of acquiring companies on a whim, there must be a reason. And until we know what that is, will you all please....CUT THE CRAP.
 

NateTheVape420

macrumors newbie
May 9, 2014
7
0
The Hate is High

Beats by Dre doesn't grab 51% of the headphone market by making bad products. They are the best headphones design wise and quality wise PERIOD. Everyone on here that has something negative to say about this deal is really mad at the fact that there giving a blk guy a billion dollars and that a blk guy is making the best headphones on the market. Beats by Dre came in and changed the headphone game forever the same way apple did with the Iphone. This is a great acquisition and a tremendous deal for both Apple and Beats and just goes to show why apple will be the number one company to ever exist in the near future. (the world is changing folks get rid of the hate from your heart it will only lead to hate in the world)
 

abshole765

macrumors 6502a
Jun 10, 2013
670
0
Sure, but only for 2 hours at a time, then you need to manually restart it. 2
+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2... is not the same as 24/7. It's worth $$$ to me to not have to keep running to my iMac in my basement office to start it up again and again.

Buy the Plex app and have all of your music and videos at your disposable.

No annual fee.




On topic, iTunes radio is still going to be garbage.
 

Millah

macrumors 6502a
Aug 6, 2008
866
515
You can hate on Beats all you want, but the fact is, the brand got the young mainstream consumer to give a damn about audio again. I don't care how audio snobs want to tear down the actual quality of audio in Beats headphones, but they got audio to be "cool," and the sound profile in Beats caters to the current young market, which likes to have more lows than a balanced sound.
 

jrswizzle

macrumors 603
Aug 23, 2012
6,107
129
McKinney, TX
Apple doesn't want to get into the Music label business, it can be a real headache dealing with a bunch of drugged up artists that crave an infinite amount of attention and have Mommy and Daddy issues!

Apple can probably make more money by improving the technology and also putting an Apple on those headphones, Beats currently controls 40% of the headphone market and they are also really big in the Hip Hop community. But again guys this deal is not about those stupid headphones!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Iovine

Beats owns 59% of the "above $99" market as well.....despite what people here think about them, they brought in $1 billion last year and are fairly dominant marketshare-wise.
 

Zerilos

macrumors 6502a
Dec 18, 2012
903
24
I'm not saying Apple is making the right decision, but the fact that Munster doesn't like it is a good sign. He is consistently wrong with his predictions about Apple.
 

Benjamins

macrumors 6502a
Jul 15, 2010
668
137
You can hate on Beats all you want, but the fact is, the brand got the young mainstream consumer to give a damn about audio again. I don't care how audio snobs want to tear down the actual quality of audio in Beats headphones, but they got audio to be "cool," and the sound profile in Beats caters to the current young market, which likes to have more lows than a balanced sound.

3 billion for an equalizer profile? really.
 

BaldiMac

macrumors G3
Jan 24, 2008
8,757
10,888
My bet, if the rumor is true, is that this is more like a straightforward investment in Beats. Beats will continue to operate as a separate brand, but ownership by Apple will allow them to work together. More iTunes and iOS integration.
 

jrswizzle

macrumors 603
Aug 23, 2012
6,107
129
McKinney, TX
Beats by Dre doesn't grab 51% of the headphone market by making bad products. They are the best headphones design wise and quality wise PERIOD. Everyone on here that has something negative to say about this deal is really mad at the fact that there giving a blk guy a billion dollars and that a blk guy is making the best headphones on the market. Beats by Dre came in and changed the headphone game forever the same way apple did with the Iphone. This is a great acquisition and a tremendous deal for both Apple and Beats and just goes to show why apple will be the number one company to ever exist in the near future. (the world is changing folks get rid of the hate from your heart it will only lead to hate in the world)

Please....keep the race baiting out of this.
 

BigHonkingDeal

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2009
832
1,027
Fort Pierce
I haven't tried Beats music service but I have tried iTunes Radio and, frankly, it sucks. I tried REALLY hard to like iTunes Radio but it only took about 3 months before I gave up completely and went back to paying $4/month for Pandora One. MUCH better!

The biggest problem with iTunes Radio is that it plays a bunch of songs I know and want to hear, BUT, with many performed by artists I've never heard of and/or don't care to hear. I'm not the least bit interested in Creedence Clearwater Revival's interpretation of 'I Heard it through the Grapevine'! Either play Marvin Gaye's version, or don't bother.

If I choose a particular station in Pandora, 99% of the songs are what I'd like to hear. With iTunes Radio, it's 50% at best.

So, for gosh sakes, PLEASE buy a company that can show you how to do it right.

Mark

Yes, I completely agree with your statement.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.