Apple's FireWire gets the nod from new High Definition Audi...

Discussion in ' News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Dec 19, 2005.

  1. macrumors bot

  2. Moderator


    Staff Member

    OK I was thinking "what new high definition Audi?" (as in Audi Quattro), as I have access to their Press site. But I now see that the word "Audio" was cut off by our title text limit on Macrumors.

    Still a good read :) (I just perused it)
  3. Moderator


    Staff Member

    Yet more clues that Apple won't be dropping FW support in MacTels.
  4. macrumors 604


    Firewire is already on a large portion of high end TVs, Audio, and Video gear. They use it to carry audio and video (similar to HDMI) but also to carry equipment commands. Say I switch my receiver to DVD then my receiver could send a command over the firewire connection to turn on the DVD player and then switch the TV to the proper input. There are other uses as well that they use it for.
  5. macrumors 601


    Maybe that's why Apple will be dropping "FireWire" support... They're "switching" to HANA. Maybe that's what the rumors are all about? (only a name change for the technology... which would be weird, considering people already know FireWire).
  6. macrumors demi-god


    This article is actually refering to an adoption of wireless firewire..
  7. macrumors 68030


    eat that USB.
  8. macrumors G5



    "Connector confusion is eliminated through the use of 1394 or FireWire. Any device can be connected to any other device with a single cable, common across all HANA devices. The user interface (UI) is then delivered over the 1394 interface using well-established Web technologies – browsers and Web servers."

  9. Moderator emeritus


    The same confusionless cable that can be jammed in backwards and light your computer on fire, right, Mr. Trevor? :D
  10. macrumors demi-god


    Look at HANA's roadmap :

    "Phase 2 benefits: WIRELESS EXTENSIONS"
  11. macrumors 68040


    That thread opened my eyes, on how someone can fry they Mac by just jamming in the FireWire "D" plug. :eek:

    Honestly, if you cannot be careful with expensive electronics then you have no reason to use them. ;) :D
  12. macrumors 68040


    FireWireless is due in 2007, great. :)

    However we are still in 2005 for a couple more weeks and then 2006. So its still cables for now. :p
  13. macrumors demi-god


    So true!

    Intel Macs wern't expected(generally) to be out as early as January either;)
  14. macrumors G5



    There's gonna be some inattentive and subsequently VERY &!$$=# off owners of expensive 42" plasma/theatre systems, I predict. Unless everyone gets smart and makes the buss power switchable on all devices, with the default being "OFF", or unless they standardize on the 4-pin FW plug for both ends of all cables...
  15. macrumors 6502a


    So what about fw800. I thought that was supposed to be all the rage in the coming years?
  16. macrumors 68040


    This roadmap was not stated by Steve Jobs either. ;) :D
  17. macrumors 68040


    what about fw1600?

    What about a PBG5?

    What about Bob? ;) :D
  18. macrumors 604



    The audio/video gear I have seen with firewire connections use the 4-pin plug like Sony's iLink.
  19. macrumors 6502a


    Bingo. FireWire will be sticking around for a long time, I don't even know how that ugly rumor got started anyway. :p
  20. macrumors 6502a


    Well... since we all know that you can't have wireless power, then if there will be any type of wireless FireWire (oxymoron) then

    1) It will have to be FireWire 400, because it can be used without the power part
    2) None of the pariferals (sp?) that hook up to it will be able to get their power source from it. Rendering wireless FireWire not very useful, considering that the majority of hardware that plugs up to FireWire does use it as a power source as well.
  21. macrumors 604


    'Fire' in Firewire does not refer to power being conducted as long as data in the cable. It's just a marketing name.

    When Apple was developing Firewire they published a document showing possible future variants and half of them were optical without power conductivity.
  22. macrumors 6502a


    What are you talking about? The technical name for FireWire 400 is IEEE 1394, and it may or may not be utilized as the power source for any hardware that is connected to it. It is in my experience that 99% of the hardware that uses "FireWire" will use it as a power source in addition to a data transfer method.
  23. macrumors 6502a


    I can see how you thought that I was thinking Fire meaning power, but I didn't mean it like that. On FireWire 400, pins 1-4 are used for data transfer, and pins 5-6 are for up to 45 Watts of power per FireWire port, allowing devices to use this as their power source.
  24. macrumors 604


    The ability to provide power to a device with the data is not a necessary component of Firewire though. Most versions of Firewire outside of Apples realm are only 4-wire.
  25. macrumors 6502a


    I comprehend that. My point was that the hardware that uses FW as it's power source (there are many) will not work with the wireless version. Most of the firewire stuff I have used are the 6-pin FW400 kind, many of which also draw their power from the FW port. A good example are external hard drives. No way can these devices be wireless unless there is a seperate power cord.

Share This Page