Apple's Lightning Connector Uses Adaptive Technology to Dynamically Assign Pin Functions

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Sep 25, 2012.

  1. MacRumors
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    With Apple's new Lightning connector on the iPhone 5 dropping to just eight contact pins from the 30 pins seen in the original dock connector and gaining the ability to be inserted in either orientation, many have wondered just how Apple has been able to maintain most of the functions of the original dock connector. Others have wondered why Apple simply didn't shift to micro-USB, an existing standard in a comparable form factor.

    Developer Rainer Brockerhoff has been examining Lightning's technical features and over the weekend outlined his thinking on how the "adaptive" nature of the Lightning connector highlighted by Apple during the technology's introduction at the iPhone 5 media event has enabled flexible functionality with a minimum of pins. Brockerhoff notes that the Lightning connector appears able to sense what kinds of devices are being connected and to use chips embedded in the cable to assign pin functionalities appropriate for each situation.
    Double Helix Cables has now shared with AppleInsider a mapping of the pins on the two sides of the Lightning connector, demonstrating that this adaptive assignment of pin functions is required for the reversible nature of the plug.
    [​IMG]


    Mapping of pins in Apple's new Lightning connector
    The adaptive nature of the Lightning connector may explain to some degree the rather high cost of cables and adapters for the new standard, as the $29 and $39 adapters for connecting 30-pin dock accessories to Lightning-equipped devices are required to contain hardware capable of working with the dynamically assigned pin functions. In addition, the adaptive nature indicates that the same Lightning interface could evolve over time to support new technologies within existing hardware.

    Article Link: Apple's Lightning Connector Uses Adaptive Technology to Dynamically Assign Pin Functions
     
  2. Andrewdodson
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2012
    Location:
    Denver, Colo.
  3. jtp098
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Location:
    Purchase
    #3
    I guess I should cancel my ebay orders for third party adapters
     
  4. GeekLawyer
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors demi-god

    GeekLawyer

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Location:
    The post is coming from inside the house!
    #4
    I'd say that's a reasonable assumption.
     
  5. BTGeekboy
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    #5
    Usb 3

    I had a hunch Lightning was this sort of expandable.

    It seems as if USB 3 is possible over the connector, given that both the phone and the cable support it (and the device on the other end, of course). This doesn't mean that iPhone 5 will ever be able to, but maybe 5++/5S/6/whatever will, without requiring yet another new connector.

    (Or, even better, Thunderbolt, but let's not get ahead of ourselves here.)
     
  6. AppleFan115, Sep 25, 2012
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2012

    AppleFan115
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    #6
    Amazing. When does the Samsung version come out?

    Note: I do love Samsung TVs but sometimes the things they do just make me laugh. It will be extra funny when they do adopt it because they just bashed it in their printed ad.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. hlfway2anywhere
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    #7
    oh and all this time i thought they'd changed the connector for NO REASON whatsoever.

    /s
     
  8. jtp098
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Location:
    Purchase
    #8
    yea it's totally not worth having to ship them back in the end. Hopefully in a few months this will change
     
  9. Gav2k
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors demi-god

    Gav2k

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
  10. troop231
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    #10
    Still holding out for cheaper, longer 3rd party cables.
     
  11. swarmster
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    swarmster

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    #11
    Can we get back to how Apple's lazy designers don't do anything now? Please?

    Unlike Samsung, which is super busy innovating stunning new ways to silently remote wipe phones with HTML.
     
  12. Colman
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    #12
    So cheap cables should work for charging but nothing else?
     
  13. Yr Blues
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2008
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    #13
    I'm hoping they can make the iPad charge faster once it's implemented on the device.
     
  14. everything-i
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Location:
    London, UK
    #14
    Probably about 6 months, Apple have done all the hard work in developing the concept after all ;)
     
  15. JuBe
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    #15
    Why not just use Thunderbolt?

    I mean, wouldn't it be practical to have the same connection across all devices, that can do data and power, like was touted? Or is it not thin enough?
     
  16. SockRolid
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    SockRolid

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Location:
    Almost Rock Solid
    #16
    Apple was granted a patent on connectors with adaptive pin assignment about a year and a half ago. Lightning appears to be the first implementation of that technology. Nice.
     
  17. iParis
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    iParis

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    New Mexico
    #17
    Wouldn't it technically be an 16-pin adaptor, 17 if you count the whole thing as one, since it's reversible and there's pin's on both sides?
     
  18. imgmkr
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    imgmkr

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Location:
    South Korea
    #18
    it's gonna be one for all cable, eh! coolio.
    although it is pricy it would be handy and useful more and more later.
     
  19. jicon
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Location:
    Victoria, BC
    #19
    Can anyone comment on the length of the adapter included with iPhone5? Is it the same length as the iPad/iPhone4, or is it now capable of being a bit longer? Really looking for a cable another foot or two longer than the standard 30pin to USB adapter.
     
  20. H2SO4
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    #20
    I think the problem with the iPhone 5 is that it doesn't feel like a stellar leap. The biggest changes are on the inside and this isn't really that tangible to your average consumer.
     
  21. troop231
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    #21
    It's the same length, but you can use a USB extension.
     
  22. iapplelove
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    iapplelove

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Location:
    East Coast USA
    #22
    can't wait for the ipad to get on board,using one cable to charge both devices is so much easier.
     
  23. iParis
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    iParis

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    New Mexico
    #23
    I'm guessing you're talking about the lightning USB cord since it doesn't come with an adaptor. It's the same length as the previous 30-pin cord.
     
  24. Dwalls90
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    Dwalls90

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    #24
    I'm really glad there is more to this switch in connector technology, then just changing the adapter.
     
  25. ThatsMrsGeek2U
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    ThatsMrsGeek2U

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    #25
    this seems amazingly forward thinking, thankfully. it hurts to have to change cables and i figured that there needed to be a better reason than just size and i was really hoping it was not different than a mini usb just for the sake of it. this makes me happy, it shows really thought and real innovation is still going on.
    we got 9 years out of the last cable, hopefully in 9 years from now cables will be a thing of the past
     

Share This Page