Apple's Low-Cost iPhone Design Said to Be Mix of iPhone 5 and iPod Touch with iPod Classic Curves

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jan 28, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    iLounge follows up its reports from last week about Apple's future iOS device plans with a new report sharing details on Apple's rumored lower-cost iPhone. According to the report, the new device will indeed be constructed primarily of plastic and offers design similarities to the iPhone 5, iPod touch, and even the iPod classic.
    The device is reportedly about half a millimeter taller and wider than the iPhone 5, but also about one millimeter thicker.

    [​IMG]
    Similarities to the iPod classic are said to arrive in the form of the curves on the rear edges of the device. The report indicates that the sides and rear of the device will all be flat and connected by distinct curves rather than extending the curves all the way through the rear shell of the device.
    [​IMG]
    The rear and bottom edges of the lower-cost iPhone will reportedly be something of a hybrid of the iPhone 5 and the current iPod touch, with a the bottom edge showing a similar layout of features to the iPhone 5 but with fewer holes.

    Apple has long been rumored to be working on a lower-cost iPhone, but rumors have accelerated in recent weeks with indications that the company may launch the device later this year.

    Article Link: Apple's Low-Cost iPhone Design Said to Be Mix of iPhone 5 and iPod Touch with iPod Classic Curves
     
  2. macrumors G4

    daneoni

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    #2
    Am i the only one who thinks this is a waste of time? Isn't the 4S/4 more than sufficient for a low cost option?
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Lordskelic

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2010
    Location:
    Texas
  4. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    #4
    I really, really doubt. Apple usually doesn't cater to low-end markets. If they did, we would have had a $600 plastic MacBook years ago.
     
  5. macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #5
    I don't understand this low cost thing. Isn't that what selling the iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S is for???
     
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    #6
    I call BS. If they are still using the retina screen, A6 Processor, dual cameras, LTE, etc. then the cost savings for the outside shell are going to be negligible for a low cost version and will not be worth the R&D rather than just selling the previous model, which they have to get rid of anyway.
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2012
    Location:
    Netherlands
    #7
    So we will soon have the bigger iPhone+, and this cheaper iPhone-.
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Location:
    Canada
    #8
    Time for the Apple takeover of third world countries!
     
  9. macrumors member

    carlos916

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Location:
    Sac Town
    #9
    Keep it up apple and ur going to lose customers to the new blackberry phone
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Location:
    Rockland/Manhattan/Bay Area
    #10
    Total waste of time to create a 'budget' iPhone
     
  11. macrumors 68000

    Tankmaze

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    #11
    More iphone on the market = great market share = more apps and other content available
     
  12. macrumors 604

    bushido

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Location:
    Germany
    #12
    wouldnt a low cost, contract free iPhone kill the iPod Touch?

    anyway, if they do release one i predict multiple colors like on the iPod Touch (probably plastic) and the "high end" iPhone staying at the "classic" black and white.
     
  13. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    #13
    Apple is currently selling the iPhone 4 for $450, and the 4S for $550. That's not low-cost for countries where carrier subsidy isn't an option.
     
  14. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Location:
    LongIsland/NYC
    #14
    Ok this whole "low cost" iPhone thing is ridiculous. Sooo they're gonna sell the iPhone 4S, iPhone 5, iPhone 5S and a "low cost" iPhone? Nope.
     
  15. Jarrodbcall, Jan 28, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013

    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2013
    #15
    This actually makes total sense to me. By replacing the 4s with the budget phone, Apple is able to make a complete transition if screen size. All phones being sold will be 4", which will let them utilize the space in the upcoming ios update. Maybe they will incorporate the taller app switcher that has been floating around?

    Also, it would complete the change to the new charger/synch cable. The consistency may be worth any extra RD costs.
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    #16
    Doesn't make sense at all. They have the older generations of iPhones for this.
     
  17. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Location:
    California
  18. macrumors 68020

    gmanist1000

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    #18
    Agreed. Not sure why this would be a good idea.
     
  19. macrumors 604

    onthecouchagain

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    #19
    If this turns out to be true, what will the naysayers do? The ones that said "Apple does not and will never deal with lower end iPhones"?

    Their worlds must be crumbling. :p

    And I wonder what the unlocked price of these will be...
     
  20. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Location:
    Belgium
    #20
    Would be nice if they do it, will widen up the market a lot. Not everyone wants to pay $650 -850 for a phone. Heck, an iPad 4th gen is way cheaper, $499-699 for wifi-only.

    Nevertheless I don't really see Apple rolling out a cheaper model, since the profits would be much lower. Unless ofcourse they find a way to maintain the big profit margins. These phones will soon be outdated though - unless they keep two versions of iOS. A high-performance and a lower-performance version. Makes it even more unlikely. I do like the design though.
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    #21
    I feel the same. Plus I think they are wasting money when they could just keep making the iPhone 4 and sell in developing markets.
     
  22. macrumors 65816

    TouchMint.com

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Location:
    Phoenix
    #22
    Still looks pretty legit (I would def buy 1 if I needed a new phone). I am guessing this will become the "free" phone with contract.
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    #23
    the 4 and 4s are not "low budget." they are only $0 or $99 because of carrier subsidies. you buy them outright or out of contract they are still $499ish

    low budget would be: buying an iPhone with no contract for $100-$250
     
  24. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    #24
    The price?

    Is going to be $ 450 for 16GB version without a contract, and free with a contract? Very nice prices!

    What do you think?
     
  25. ElTorro, Jan 28, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013

    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    #25
    Does it matter what the back side is made of or what it looks like? Most people will put the phone into a big plastic case anyway.
     

Share This Page