I don't know if it's already been posted but I noticed this on Apple's website.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
cr2sh said:Has anyone used both the $13,000 solution and the Apple solution? How different are the two techniques?
GimmeSlack12 said:The 2 techniques are very different. Although they accomplish the same thing. Dual Boot.
The Apple method has working drivers, and a simple process as is expected by Apple.
Apple's method is the way to go.
p0intblank said:I haven't used either, but I do know for a fact that Apple's solution is MUCH more user-friendly.
Both ways achieve Dual Booting. I don't know what the difference is concerning how it is done. Apple's way requires you do an install. The $13k way requires a whole lot of other crap.cr2sh said:Of course Apple's method is easier... of course it has more drivers... but is there a chance that Apple took that other setup technique and just simplified the process... or is this a whole new work around?
GimmeSlack12 said:All that matters is that it works.
Well, I haven't done either, but I read over the instructions.cr2sh said:That might be all that matters... but that's not what I asked.
The title of this thread is "Apple's Solution to booting Windows." and my question is... how is this solution different?
GimmeSlack12 said:Both ways achieve Dual Booting. I don't know what the difference is concerning how it is done. Apple's way requires you do an install. The $13k way requires a whole lot of other crap.
All that matters is that it works.