April 23, 1983: Even an Improved Apple III Can't Overcome t...

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Apr 23, 2007.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. Guest

    ppc_michael

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #2
    I remember my elementary school had an Apple /// in the library. I used to play Word Munchers on there.
     
  3. macrumors 65816

    Clive At Five

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    St. Paul, MN
    #3
    I find it amusing that the Apple][ series outlived the Apple /// "series" by a good 8 years before it finally died.

    @PPC_Michael: I played Number Munchers on the ][gs in my school's library. I guess I'm just a young'n... ;)

    -Clive
     
  4. macrumors 68000

    steve_hill4

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    NG9, England
    #4
    Still doesn't hold true to the prophecy "Apple ][ Forever". Remember that in the early days the profits from the Apple ][ were funding the Macintosh project and poor sales.

    It's quite sad in a way that pretty much all generations from 10 years ago onwards will never have known the experience of growing up at a school that had a command line based computer in it.
     
  5. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    #5
    I had one of these in the house while I was growing up. I can't remember any problems with it , maybe it was an Apple ///+. It sounds funny now I was so proud it had 128k RAM, if I remember correctly. I also can't believe how long I spent on playing text based games on that monochrome screen. Kids will be kids I guess.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    Clive At Five

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    St. Paul, MN
    #6
    Dude, I love DOS. It's the best. People watching me do stuff in DOS think I'm an evil genius.

    -Clive
     
  7. macrumors 65816

    yadmonkey

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Location:
    Western Spiral
    #7
    Whatever... I'm waiting for the Apple 4 before I buy...
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    Clive At Five

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    St. Paul, MN
    #8
    HAH!

    Don't you mean "AppleBook4?"

    Remember, you need to fit Apple's naming scheme: Product Line - Product Type - Product Class ... AND you have to mash up as many hard consonants together as possible.

    -Clive
     
  9. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Location:
    Birmingham, AL
    #9
    Apple III Problems

    I seem to remember that the Apple III was the first attempt at Apple to have the chips inserted by machine vs by hand (could be wrong there but I think that is right). What I remember is that some of the pins did not insert correctly and would actually curl back. The chips had enough contact to pass the QA process but when they were shipped the vibration during shipping would cause some of the pins to lose contact. Many of the first shipments suffered from this problem and the techs were told to use the drop technique to reseat the chips. This was to be a temporary fix until new chips were ship to the dealer.

    As far as early Mac sales, the original 128K Mac just did not have enough memory. Folks that had been using the Lisa were not willing to step down to 128K. In October 1984 the 512k Mac was released with better success.
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    steve_hill4

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    NG9, England
    #10
    Drool, quad core 6502, each core running at 4MHz. Just imagine what you could do with that....:rolleyes:
     
  11. macrumors 603

    SkyBell

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    Texas, unfortunately.
    #11
    Well our music teachers in elementary school weren't exactly provided with the best equipment, so I got to tinker with a lot of Power Mac 5500's and a few IIe's and IIc's.

    I loved using the IIe's and IIc's (Because lets face it; OS 8 sucks) The green monochrome screens...they were cool. :)
     

Share This Page