AT&T LTE Speeds

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by iMas70, Mar 28, 2013.

  1. iMas70 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Location:
    MA
    #1
    I did a quick test while waiting for dinner last night. Not bad at all!

    [​IMG]
     
  2. canvasback13 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    #2
    Those are good results. You have me beat by a little. I find LTE to be very fast in my area.

    I just ran a test:
    [​IMG]
     
  3. Mlrollin91 macrumors 603

    Mlrollin91

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Location:
    Ventura County
    #3
    My highest in San Diego is 60.46Mbps down and 20.81Mbps up. I normally average around 30 down and 15 up though.
     
  4. barkomatic macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Location:
    Manhattan
    #4
    AT&T speeds in NYC have declined significantly since the iPhone 5 was introduced. I assume that's because of more people on the network.

    I still get an average about about 16Mps down and 7Mps up which is fine. My only complaint is that around lunchtime and just after work the LTE basically stops working in my area of the city.
     
  5. Wicked1 macrumors 68040

    Wicked1

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #5
    Not a Big Fan of the new Speed Test App, I think the older view looked better

    I wish we had constant LTE in the area of NJ I am in, it is good North or South of me, but not where I live and work in Central NJ
     
  6. Applejuiced macrumors Nehalem

    Applejuiced

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Location:
    At the iPhone hacks section.
    #6
    Here's mine.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. tidybc macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2010
    Location:
    PUERTO RICO, USA
    #8
    You think that is bad? This is what i get everyday! :(
     

    Attached Files:

  8. iMas70 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Location:
    MA
    #9
    It would be faster to send smoke signals!!!
     
  9. bushman4 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    #11

    Speeds in NYC have been stedily decreasing. By December they'll be almost as bad as 3G. Unless ATT adds capacity
     
  10. antman2295 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2010
    #12
    Fastest I've gotten in Jefferson City is 25 down and 7 up. But it was just rolled out on Monday, so I can cut them some slack, I'm sure they are working on fixing it.
     
  11. AutoUnion39 macrumors 601

    AutoUnion39

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    #13
    It's the same for VZW also. Both carriers have been adding sites to the NYC market all the time. They've also gone on record to say that they will deploy LTE on their AWS bands to supplement stress on the 700 band. Both carriers will be adding thousands of macro and small cell sites all over the city to help also.
     
  12. Missjenna macrumors 6502a

    Missjenna

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Location:
    Oregon
    #14
    [​IMG]

    This is what I got in portland, oregon while I was driving through last weekend.
     
  13. AppleFanatic10 macrumors 68020

    AppleFanatic10

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Location:
    Los Angeles but missing San Diego </3
    #15
    I've heard that AT&T speeds are terrible in NYC... not sure how true that is, probably depends on what part of NYC you live in??
     
  14. barkomatic macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Location:
    Manhattan
    #16
    If you've got an LTE device they are generally very good--except sometimes at rush hour when many people leave work and get on their devices. I believe it certainly has to do with the part of NYC you are in. There are more residential areas where there is little or no speed hit.

    I used to get 50 or 60Mbps down with my LTE iPad prior to the iPhone 5 launch. Those speeds are long gone.
     
  15. BJMRamage macrumors 68020

    BJMRamage

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    #17
    Nice Boh!
     
  16. bushman4 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    #18
    If the carriers don't improve the speed where its needed, people are going to be hesitant to pay for it.
     

Share This Page