Batman: Arkham City and The Witcher 2 Arrive in Mac App Store

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Dec 13, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Two hit games arrived for Mac today in Batman: Arkham City Game of the Year Edition and The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings Enhanced Edition and are now available in the Mac App Store.

    After being announced for Mac in October, Feral Interactive has brought Arkham City to Mac a year after its release on consoles and a year after the predecessor Arkham Asylum was released in the Mac App Store.

    [​IMG]
    The Game of the Year Edition includes all the DLC that hit the consoles for no extra cost, including the Harley Quinn's Revenge story mission, multiple skins and Challenge Map packs. Arkham City is going for $39.99 in the Mac App Store [App Store Link] and its minimum system requirements are a 2.0 GHz processor, 4 GB of RAM, a 256MB graphics card and 16GB of harddrive space.

    The other big release is The Witcher 2 which, unlike Arkham City, comes from original developer CD Projeckt RED and is on sale right now for $19.99 [App Store Link]. It arrives eight months after arriving on Xbox 360 and a year and a half after it was released on PC.

    [​IMG]
    The Witcher 2 has been heralded as one of the best RPGs in the past could years and contains all the enhancements and DLC that the Xbox 360 version contains. You can check if your Mac meets the requirements at The Witcher website. The minimum specs require OS X 10.7.5 or later, an Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 4 GB RAM, GeForce GT 650M 512 MB, Radeon HD 5770 1 GB and 25 GB free HDD space.

    Article Link: Batman: Arkham City and The Witcher 2 Arrive in Mac App Store
     
  2. macrumors regular

    xxgilxx

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    #2
    Sure I'm gonna get a copy of this when I can get a console version for 15 bucks. AC is an awesome game though...
     
  3. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    #3
    Just a clarification: Witcher 2 has been out for the Mac for months now. Today is just its MAS debut.
     
  4. macrumors 68030

    iSayuSay

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    #4
    Call me pedantic, but spec requirement is technically possible yet not plausible. Surely not for Mac.

    Which Mac that have Core 2 Duo AND Geforce 650M or even Radeon 5770?
    Any Mac with C2D wouldn't have enough GPU power to run those games, and any Mac with 650M or stronger already on Core i5 or i7. Confusing, no?
    While on PC it's still possible to pair C2D with geforce 680.
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Location:
    Canada
    #5
    A bit late, while both are good games, they're both bargain bin games.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    #6
  7. macrumors 603

    ArtOfWarfare

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    #7
    Really? I wasn't aware quality games dropped in price so rapidly... I was shocked at the $40 price tag (seemed low to me.)

    I guess, with this new found knowledge, I may never buy a game at launch again... Why pay $60 (which is too expensive, whatever happened to $50 at launch?) when you can wait a year and pay $30?
     
  8. Cougarcat, Dec 13, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2012

    macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    #8
    As far as Mac ports go, it's actually a very good deal. $40, not $50, and it's the GOTY version so you get everything. The PC GOTY version is $30 on Steam, so it's not that much more (granted, that same version will be discounted to $14 or less during the Winter sale...)


    Unfortunately it's pretty much par for the course that Mac ports arrive when the PC version is in the bargain bin.
     
  9. crazy dave, Dec 13, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2012

    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #9
    It's not so much meant to be reflective of a particular machine, just that the CPU requirements are not as intense as the graphics requirements. It might be barely possible for an old MacPro that's been updated to have such a spec (i.e. old processor but new or better graphics chip - obviously it would have desktop graphics card). I'm not actually sure that's a possible machine, but as I said, I think it is more reflective that the CPU usage is not as intense as the graphics chip.

    As an FYI I ran The Witcher 2 on my Windows partition on my 17-inch MacBook Pro with an i7 processor and Geforce GT 330M. It ran - it wasn't pretty, but it was playable. However, I get the impression that the OS X engine isn't quite as optimized (originally a DirectX game) and the drivers are likewise not quite optimized, so I'm not convinced it would work on my Mac side (I haven't tried even though I can download either version from GOG). I also only have Snow Leopard still.

    ----------

    Also note, GOG's is both Mac and Windows version, DRM-free :)

    The 75% sale expires in less than 10 hours.
     
  10. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2012
    #10
    Is it a native port or just a skin wrap?
     
  11. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    #11
    Batman AC will be native as it was ported by Feral... Don't know about the other though (?)

    Can't wait to play AC, have been waiting for the Mac version, thanks Feral! Though I'm almost 100% done on AA so will have to try and finish that first otherwise ill never go back :\
     
  12. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    #12
    Now they need to get Skyrim and Total War series to mac and it's bye bye windows for me :D. If only apple would update their opengl drivers
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    #13
    Even an old Mac Pro is faster than many Core i machines.
     
  14. g-7
    macrumors 6502

    g-7

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Location:
    Poland
    #14
    Witcher 2 seems to be native, there are no Cider or Wine files inside the bundle.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #15
    Never been big on anything batman but the witcher games look awesome!
     
  16. macrumors 601

    Icaras

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Location:
    California, United States
    #16
    YESSSS. More support for Mac gaming. :cool:

    Will purchase Witcher 2 this weekend. Now can we also get the first Witcher on the MAS too? :D

    Still have to play through Arkham Asylum first so I can hold out for a price drop on Arkham city later, but I'm definitely happy to see both Arkham games on the Mac now.
     
  17. macrumors 68030

    iSayuSay

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    #17
    If you're talkin about 6 core MP and beyond then yes.
    But a quad MP? It's not reallty that fast, both CPU and GPU has been crapped out by top end 27" iMac for some time now.

    Classic reason .. Top end iMac costs $2300 or so for upgraded CPU and GPU, 27" display included.

    while a new quad MP costs what? $2500 for a West"mere" Xeon and puny Radeon 5770? And it doesn't even have any display included. I find it really hard to justify the purchase, even if I am a blinded Apple fan.
     
  18. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    #18
    Wonder how regional restrictions figure into this. The Witcher 2 in Australia could not achieve an MA15+ rating without being modified (as trivial as the modification was). If someone in Australia buys W2 from MAS, will they get the same version as everyone else?
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    chaosbunny

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Location:
    down to earth, far away from any clouds
    #19
    The Witcher 2 runs about the same in Mac OS 10.8 and Windows 7 on my Mac Pro. Seems like a decent port. Getting the game in the MAS is a bad deal though, on gog.com you get both the Mac and Windows version completely drm free plus a bunch of other goodies (soundtrack, wallpapers, making-of videos, etc.).
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    ncaissie

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    #20
    I only Paid $20 for B AC on the PS3.
     
  21. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #21
    Game companies need to stop selling the rights to the Mac versions to porting companies like feral. Instead they should pay them a large sum to port it and then release it themselves. This would allow the game to show up in steam and the people who already bought the game for pc in steam would already have a Mac copy. But because feral would lose tons of money that way since they don't get any money from pc versions, the Mac version cannot go on steam. It's a shame.
     
  22. macrumors 68000

    mentaluproar

    Joined:
    May 25, 2010
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    #22
    Not really. Mac steam sucks.

    I'm hesitant to get the AC, since AA choked on my mini at native res.
     
  23. macrumors member

    Blomkvist

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Location:
    North Carolina
    #23
    I have a hard time swallowing these types of gripes. Let's all please realize that game developers/publishers are in business to MAKE money....and not give their product away. I agree that it's unfortunate that PC versions come out 99.9% of the time prior to Mac versions being ported or released. But think where we would be if Feral closed up shop?!
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Location:
    Canada
    #24
    Exactly ... I never pay full retail price when it will drop in price in ~3 months. I have too many games to play!

    Yeah, both games are ~20.00 in Canada already. Hard to justify full retail price when it's already been discounted for console.

    ----------

    Arkham Asylum and Arkham City are amazing games. A bit of RPG, stealth, action, and heavy story mixed in. You won't be disappointed! But to play AA/AC you absolutely need a game pad (or console).
     
  25. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2010
    #25
    If those AC requirements are accurate, they're lower than the PC ones. How is that possible?
     

Share This Page