'Beats Music' Updated With In-App Subscriptions, Offline Mode and More

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Apr 18, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Beats has updated its Beats Music streaming music app with in-app subscriptions, Facebook friend search, an offline mode and more. The move allows users to subscribe to the Beats Music service via their iTunes account.
    Previously, users had to subscribe to Beat Music on the service's website, allowing Beats to bypass Apple's 70 / 30 split with developers, which would result in the Cupertino company netting $3 a month from Beats Music's $10-a-month fee for every subscriber Beats adds within the app.

    Beats CEO Ian Rogers tells Re/code that the company made its decision to add in-app subscriptions, and therefore submit to the 70 / 30 split, when it found that more than half of its users used iPhones, making it difficult to get an iOS user to subscribe with no in-app subscription option.

    Other music streaming services like Rdio and Rhapsody also sell subscriptions in-app, although Rdio's in-app subscription price was raised from $10 a month to $15 a month to make up for Apple's cut. Spotify, however, does not offer in-app subscriptions, though it does offer a free, ad-supported mode available in its app.

    Beats Music is available in the App Store for free. [Direct Link]

    Article Link: 'Beats Music' Updated With In-App Subscriptions, Offline Mode and More
     
  2. macrumors 68040

    Goldfrapp

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
  3. macrumors 68020

    Aluminum213

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    #3
    Still no iPad app, Beats music has a long way to go to catch up to spotify


    The new spotify revision on the iPhone is fantastic, once they update their iPad app it's game over
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    #4
    So why, or how, can Beats afford to offer the in-app price the same as their regular subscription and Spotify does not at all and Rdio is $14.99?
    I prefer Spotify but I really would like managing my sub within iTunes (yes I know Apple will take a cut).
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    Frankied22

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    #5

    Rdio is $9.99 and $4.99 for students.
     
  6. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    #6
    Hooray! But you didn't answer my question.
     
  7. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    #7
    For Apple this is truly great news. After Microsoft Office this is the second major service in à short while that has in-app subscriptions. Previously My experience is that only smaller names have done this. If this becomes an established way for big name services, it child mean a not insignificant boost to iTunes revenue, especially in a long term view.
     
  8. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    #8
    I've been a Beats Music user from the start, and they had an offline mode before this update.

    I think what you're reading in their update notes is improvements to the Offline Mode.
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    Uofmtiger

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2010
    Location:
    Memphis
    #9
    I am still using MOG and would rather see Beats implement the artist radio slider and one place to see new releases rather than having to work through genres.

    Right now, I am trying out a free month of Spotify, too. I prefer MOG, but I am sure that won't be a choice for much longer. The main upside to Spotify is the desktop app and iPad app, so I may move to them if the radio slider/artist radio doesn't make a comeback on Beats. If Spotify adds Connect to their desktop app, that would be a great feature.
     
  10. macrumors 68040

    Orlandoech

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #10
    Lol at Beats and their inferior, overpriced, overhyped, over marketed products.

    I absolutely love Dr Dre but beats are a joke. Headphones. Apps. Music boxes. Etc. all pure crap. It's like saying Bose is the benchmark for great audio. Eh oh el.
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    iDuel

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Location:
    Greece/USA
    #11
    Only if Spotify would allow subscriptions through in-app purchases...
     
  12. macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #12
    Catalog is bigger and better on Google play music. I've had both and Google really is better in terms of content.
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    malnar

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    #13
    No, actually it doesn't. Spotify's pretty bad. The most minimal of organization within the app kills it for me. It's unusable in its current form, even after the "Your Music" upgrade. I decided to give Spotify another try when that was announced. Still sucks. Still no album listings under artists?! Just a big long list of songs?! Spotify doesn't get music. It's pretty clear this is something driven by a corporation and not music lovers. It's why Rdio and Beats Music are such better experiences. The only things going for Spotify are that it was one of the very first, and that it has a couple of exclusives like Led Zeppelin and Metallica.
     
  14. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2010
    Location:
    ><
    #14
    Agreed, beats is down there with Samsungs milk service

    ----------

    There has always been album listings. You just don't know how to use it I guess.
     
  15. macrumors 68000

    \-V-/

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    #15
    I think that's only available for the subscriber version. The free version is rather limited. I haven't used the free version in ages so I don't remember. But yeah ... album listings have been available for a very long time.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    poobear

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    #16
    As an European, another plus is that I can actually use it. Beats is unavailable here.
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    Uofmtiger

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2010
    Location:
    Memphis
    #17
    They list them, but you have to go through a large photo of the artist, "shuffle play", "popular songs", "related artists", and tour dates first... In other words, albums starts on the third page when you scroll up. MOG lists everything (albums, songs, playlists, similar artists, artist radio, and add to favorites) on page one. I prefer MOG's approach, but I am not sure anyone else is making it so easy to get to albums from an artist. Also, once I get to albums, I can easily list them alphabetical, release date, or by popularity. It is perfect for someone that uses this service to listen to albums.

    I still have to check out Google again, but I understand the complaints about the Spotify layout. I have tried Beats and the layout, for the way I listen, is better than Spotify.

    Spotify was no where near the first to offer the service in the USA. They took the market by storm with an unmatched marketing campaign that was based on social media. Rhapsody and others had a several year head start.
     
  18. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 30, 2007
    #18
    Nope, not really.

    MOG, which was acquired by Beats had the best selection (IMO) and consistently the best sound quality. Spotify seems to have the most covers....

    Still not sure how Beats compares to MOG, though.
     
  19. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    #19
    Wrong, I had Spotify, and it can't hold a candle to this app.

    The music IQ on this app is higher than Spotify could ever WISH for.

    Plus with a family share option, and carrier billing it's a NO BRAINER!!!
     
  20. macrumors 68000

    SPUY767

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    GA
    #20
    Because they have extra money from charging 300$ for headphones that ought to cost 25$?
     
  21. macrumors 65816

    Uofmtiger

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2010
    Location:
    Memphis
    #21
    I think there is some truth to this. Having a larger company with more revenue streams probably provides more flexibility while getting their service off the ground. Also, teaming with AT&T couldn't hurt.
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    malnar

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    #22
    Nope, I've got it open in front of me right now. Subscribed, by the way, to the full $9.99 rate. I go into Your Music, go to Artists, scroll to something I want, let's say Led Zeppelin. I have 6 LZ albums saved to my iPhone. I go into their section and what do I find? I seemingly endless list of songs. No albums. I have to go into Your Music>Albums for albums to show up, but then they're not listed by artists but alphabetically. So if I've downloaded Led Zeppelin's III and Physical Graffiti as well as Metallica's Master Of Puppets, the listing goes

    Led Zeppelin III
    Master of Puppets
    Physical Graffiti

    Not

    Led Zeppelin III
    Physical Graffiti
    Master of Puppets

    Which would be fine... IF it did that in the Artists view. But it doesn't. Spotify has NEVER understood this.

    I would love for all the Beats naysayers to actually explain what is wrong with it. I've been using it since day 1 and it's been a better experience than any of the other services. It had a few rough weeks right at the start where some issues popped up, but they took care of them right away. I even contacted their customer service and they were right on top of things. Sound quality is, just like MOG before it, excellent, and its recommendations are pretty sharp. The app is well organized and easy to use. I have few complaints, and they're the same complaints I had about MOG, which is that they're missing a handful of vital albums from artists I care about - but luckily I own those anyway (I just like to have them all available in the same place).
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    Ajones330

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Location:
    SEC Country
    #23
    I like the Beats App, just need more artist. They have come out with updates that really improved it because initially my phone would get really hot and was afraid I would damage it...
     
  24. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    #24
    You can tell that Beats was made my people that actually understand Music.

    And how is the family share feature being so overlooked!? On Spotify we would CONSTANTLY interrupt each other's sessions #, talk about maddening!?

    I'd give it a year or so, and Spotify will go the way of Rhapsody,Netscape, etc...
     
  25. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    #25
    "Beats CEO Ian Rogers tells Re/code that the company made its decision to add in-app subscriptions, and therefore submit to the 70 / 30 split, when it found that more than half of its users used iPhones, making it difficult to get an iOS user to subscribe*with no in-app subscription option."

    Really? It took you till now to figure that out? That bodes real well for the future of Beats..lol.
     

Share This Page