Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
BlackBook has 256MB Dedicated VRAM?
- Thread starter baxterbrittle
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Rovman said:
1. GMA/950 is set in OS X by Apple to draw a maximum of 64 MB.
2. GMA/950 can from Intel draw up to 224 MB.
3. Some people believe the GMA/950 can draw 80 MB in OS X. They're wrong. The extra 16 MB are drawn to run OS X and the boot-up. GMA can in OS X not draw more than 64 MB. Some users have in Vista Beta seen that their MB's draw 224 MB, but not in OS X.
4. To the OP. Can you take a screenshot of that insane MB, and BTW, arr you sure it wasn't and MBP?
Josias said:4. To the OP. Can you take a screenshot of that insane MB, and BTW, arr you sure it wasn't and MBP?
Which one is the MacBook Pro again? Is that the one that's black and made of plastic with a glossy screen? I'll go and take a photo rather than a screen shot - A screen shot can more easily be photoshop'd. So if I took a screen cap everyone would go - oh he photoshop'd it he's such a liar yarda yarda yarda. I'm not here to **** with anyone - I just want to get to the bottom of it.
Can a 950 use dedicated VRAM? I have never heard of such a thing, but that doesn't mean that it isn't possible I suppse. Engineers?
Could this be some sort of upgraded BIOS (I know, wrong term, but you know what I mean) that instead allocates 256MB, and is just labeled as VRAM when it is actually shared from system memory?
Ideas?
Could this be some sort of upgraded BIOS (I know, wrong term, but you know what I mean) that instead allocates 256MB, and is just labeled as VRAM when it is actually shared from system memory?
Ideas?
Dunepilot said:
This machine has been restarted multiple times I think since I last saw it - but can't be positive. I will try to investigate further when I get the chance. Anyone know if activity monitor reports anything for the shared memory for the 950? Because that would be a helpful indication.
Josias said:
From Apple's MacBook Tech Specs page:
"Memory available to Mac OS X may vary depending on graphics needs. Minimum graphics memory usage is 80MB, resulting in 432MB of system memory available."
Josias said:Dude, that is the systme/boot thingy drawing the extra 16 MB. Nor mally these 16 MB would'a been drawn from the VRAM, but since there is none, this is considered consumed by the GMA indirectly.
Yes, but that paragraph also states that's the minimum VRAM usage, not the maximum.
someguy said:I hope Apple isn't putting better machines on the floor to drive ordinary MacBook sales.
That's pretty unlikely, isn't it. Apart from the fact that those things sell themselves, it'd be legally questionable to do that (at least in the UK) under the Trade Descriptions Act.
Manipulated?
Hmm, well, my MacBoot designation is also 1,1, serial no. is the same too.
My guess, someone has been using image manipulation...
Opened it in photoshop, and zoomed right in (bear in mind that I am no image manipulation expert), and the two in 256 for vid memory looks a little suspicious, the 5 also looks a bit off, but not so much. Though that could just be the jpeg artifacts.
In general, if it is a fake, then it seems quite a good one (I would imagine a screenshot photoshoped then re-screenshoted to get it right).
Just my thoughts.
Hmm, well, my MacBoot designation is also 1,1, serial no. is the same too.
My guess, someone has been using image manipulation...
Opened it in photoshop, and zoomed right in (bear in mind that I am no image manipulation expert), and the two in 256 for vid memory looks a little suspicious, the 5 also looks a bit off, but not so much. Though that could just be the jpeg artifacts.
In general, if it is a fake, then it seems quite a good one (I would imagine a screenshot photoshoped then re-screenshoted to get it right).
Just my thoughts.
NightGeometry said:
Yup. Well spotted. The '2' in '256' looks too thin compared to the others for my liking.
But at the same time, I can't understand why anyone would bother faking such a picture
Well, you could just do it to see how much attention you get, to set off an 'upgrade tuesday' thread (G5 powerbooks anyone?).
Why does anyone ever post a manipulated image of a non-existent Apple product?
Apart from that two looking a little bit odd it seems quite good. I tried saving out the system profile editing and reloading, but whilst I could change some things couldn't find how to change video memory. And I've no idea how you'd get a saved file to load in system profile by default. BUT - that would be my guess, someone has created a fake system profile, and knows how to get that to load by default. Then gone into the store and basically made an 'adjustment' to the machine to show the changed file.
If that is possible, then I like it. It seems a real subtle trick to play
Does the GMA 950 exist in a version with dedicated memory?
Why does anyone ever post a manipulated image of a non-existent Apple product?
Apart from that two looking a little bit odd it seems quite good. I tried saving out the system profile editing and reloading, but whilst I could change some things couldn't find how to change video memory. And I've no idea how you'd get a saved file to load in system profile by default. BUT - that would be my guess, someone has created a fake system profile, and knows how to get that to load by default. Then gone into the store and basically made an 'adjustment' to the machine to show the changed file.
If that is possible, then I like it. It seems a real subtle trick to play
Does the GMA 950 exist in a version with dedicated memory?
Trying to get attention!? Are you kidding?
Seriously why would I bother photoshopping this rubbish? What would be the point? I was in the shop and saw this and thought hey now that's interesting I should see what other people's MacBook's show. It seems that most have reported 64MB Shared so my guess is that there is some sort of reporting error - maybe a glitch with an unupdated system? Maybe they use a standard Install image across the showroom so that all machines have the same info and that particular image doesn't have the correct software to recognise the MacBook - then why does the machine next to it report 64MB Shared? I don't know. Why are there 3 different logic board when there is really only 2 configurations of machine? I don't know - this is why I am asking.
As I said when I started this if the BlackBook has 256MB dedicated then I would buy one instead of a white one. That's why I'm trying to get to the bottom of this! Just because you can't offer any constructive reasoning as to why this machine says what it says you just go, oh he photoshopped it - oh look at the 2 it looks sort of funny and I know photoshop work when I see it, blah blah blah.
Seriously why would I bother photoshopping this rubbish? What would be the point? I was in the shop and saw this and thought hey now that's interesting I should see what other people's MacBook's show. It seems that most have reported 64MB Shared so my guess is that there is some sort of reporting error - maybe a glitch with an unupdated system? Maybe they use a standard Install image across the showroom so that all machines have the same info and that particular image doesn't have the correct software to recognise the MacBook - then why does the machine next to it report 64MB Shared? I don't know. Why are there 3 different logic board when there is really only 2 configurations of machine? I don't know - this is why I am asking.
As I said when I started this if the BlackBook has 256MB dedicated then I would buy one instead of a white one. That's why I'm trying to get to the bottom of this! Just because you can't offer any constructive reasoning as to why this machine says what it says you just go, oh he photoshopped it - oh look at the 2 it looks sort of funny and I know photoshop work when I see it, blah blah blah.
Oh and I've got a Hi Definition PowerBook but you probably eouldn't believe that either
No really I have!
No really I have!
netdog said:
It's a reseller store and I used to work there - You can't get anything out of Apple. Nobody at Apple AUS would know anyway!
Can anyone tell me if Activity Monitor reports anything for the GMA's memory usage? Anyone at all - preferably with MB or MacMini.
Cheers