Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by zimv20, Dec 27, 2003.
Hah! Who needs enemies when you have friends who drop you in it by unexpectedly telling the truth (for a change!)
Blair's decision to support Bush is now revealed for what it was - a personal bid for world statesmanship in the face of the facts.
Sounds like they forgot to synchronize their bull**** files.
thankfully bremer has called " bull****" on blair's statements, but where was bremer when cheney was making similar bogus claims?
and speaking of red herrings....how about this little tidbit thrown in at the end of the article:
"In recent days, senior Whitehall officials have raised the extraordinary possibility that Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction after all - but believed he did after being misled by his own advisors."
i can't wait for bush to adopt this far-fetched, though theoretically impossible to debunk, hypothesis... just think of it, we can attack anyone because they " believe" they have wmd.
Or better yet, since Bush has already said that having WMD is the same as potential to get WMD, maybe the end result will be that if someone in the nation believes they might have the potential to get WMD they can play host their own US asskicking invasion (paid for by the US taxpayer).
"Mr. President, why did we invade Quebec?"
"Some of them thought they might be able to make a batch of mustard gas.
And they're French"