Bah. My $1,500 MSI laptop has been flawless for 18 months (and counting). People I follow on Twitter have had far more issues with their Macs, but to each his own. Or her, I suppose.
This guy sounds like a baby. Seems like he was just trying to be devils advocate and get money for nothing. They offered to replace the broken parts for him but he thought he would get another defective part. Some people need to grow up.
Couldn't this all have been avoided had the guy at the Genius Bar realized the full extent of the problem and simply ordered a repair/replacement? Do they have that much discretion?
Bah. My $1,500 MSI laptop has been flawless for 18 months (and counting). People I follow on Twitter have had far more issues with their Macs, but to each his own. Or her, I suppose.
Im siding with Apple on this one - from what I can tell, the Apple where unable to verify the reason the machine had failed was because of the GPU, in-fact it looks lightly that the GPU was not faulty and it was another component on the logic board, and in this case would be unable to claim the cost of the repair back from NVidia. Also, to my knowledge, the replacement logic boards are of a new revision (rev B), so the GPU shouldn't suffer from the same issue.
Sorry, wasn't the logic board not the issue, but the GPU? From what I read, Apple claimed it was the logic board when in fact it wasn't, and wouldn't further the matter. The customer knew (perhaps reading forums, etc) that this MacBook Pro suffered from the known issue of the nVidia card defect. However, Apple claimed:
1) that his machine wasn't listed under warranty as he upgraded the GHz. If this is true, the customer should have been informed at the time of purchase. This should not negate coverage for a defective product
-further-
2) Sending in lawyers when a simple replacement for a documented defective GPU seems overkill. Fighting one customer over a known product defect for a top model notebook adds insult to injury.
3) Claiming this man is a "crybaby" is immature. If anyone of us had this same issue, I highly doubt you'd appreciate being called childish names. I side with the customer.
I'm an Apple user, have been for over a decade. I will defend Apple when appropriate, but blindly making excuses for Apple in this instance is baffling.
I can't believe you think that means anything.
One persons personal experience mean nothing, nothing at all.
You have to look at the stats. Personal opinion and experience never stand up in an argument.
The expected life of a Macbook Pro is six years.
This nVidia issue affected models across all vendors including lower end dell and HPs with the 8600m. Try again.
My BTO MacBook Pro was covered for exactly this problem when the 8600M died. They replaced the logic board in less than 24 hours IIRC.
What is really strange is the contradiction in this article. Either:
1. He was prepared to accept a logic board failure and Apple didn't wouldn't (hence the surprise by him and the judge when they found out Nvidia pick up the tab)
-or-
2. He was refusing to let them replace the logic board as stated earlier in the article. Which is short-sighted of him as only certain batches of the GeForce 8600M were bad, not the entire design.
Finally the only people who will do will be well compensated in the class action lawsuit are the lawyers.
[)amien
Apple seems to be getting more and more greedy as time goes on. They make hard drives that were made to make it hard to upgrade. They won't support flash. Refusal to support Blu Ray so you will buy things from ITunes. This to go along with my 20 inch G5 IMac that works well as a boat anchor after being repaired twice, logic board, and breaking for the third time at 3 years and 4 months. I'm writing this on a iPad and I have a newer iMac, but Apple please do better.
hey make hard drives that were made to make it hard to upgrade.
They won't support flash.
Refusal to support Blu Ray so you will buy things from ITunes.
Sorry, wasn't the logic board not the issue, but the GPU? From what I read, Apple claimed it was the logic board when in fact it wasn't, and wouldn't further the matter. The customer knew (perhaps reading forums, etc) that this MacBook Pro suffered from the known issue of the nVidia card defect. However, Apple claimed:
1) that his machine wasn't listed under warranty as he upgraded the GHz. If this is true, the customer should have been informed at the time of purchase. This should not negate coverage for a defective product
-further-
2) Sending in lawyers when a simple replacement for a documented defective GPU seems overkill. Fighting one customer over a known product defect for a top model notebook adds insult to injury.
3) Claiming this man is a "crybaby" is immature. If anyone of us had this same issue, I highly doubt you'd appreciate being called childish names. I side with the customer.
I'm an Apple user, have been for over a decade. I will defend Apple when appropriate, but blindly making excuses for Apple in this instance is baffling.
I can't believe you think that means anything.
One persons personal experience mean nothing, nothing at all.
You have to look at the stats. Personal opinion and experience never stand up in an argument.
The problem is - there is no evidence to suggest that the GPU has failed in this case, other than its a common failure on these models.
More people suing Apple over silly things, what else is new???
Stop with the apple Koolaid
This is a great win for the little guy
Apple is now too big for its own good
Apple is evil
Actually the GPU is part of the logic board so any failure in the GPU = failure in the logic board but if the logic board fails how does one know it is not the GPU as with a dead logic board there is now way to test the GPU minus removing it manually - ie removing the solder and put it in a working logic board thus in the end it would be just cheaper for apple to replace the whole logic board. The logic board that apple uses to replace in the 2007 - 2008 series that uses the 8600M is different than the original Logic Board as they have totally different part numbers. Most cases they also replace the top cover leads me to believe that the replacement logic board is slightly different then the original one.