BlueStacks' Android App Player for Mac Moves into Beta with Support for All 750,000+ Apps

Discussion in ' News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Dec 27, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    Back in June, we noted that BlueStacks had introduced an alpha version of its Android app player software for Mac. The app, which is also available for Windows, allows users to run Android apps on their desktop machines. With the alpha launch, however, BlueStacks supported only about 15 Android titles on the Mac.

    As noted by VentureBeat, BlueStacks today announced that its Mac app has moved into beta, opening up access to all 750,000+ Android apps.
    TechCrunch has more on the developments, noting that BlueStacks has surpassed five million organic installs of its Windows and Mac apps, and has reached an agreement with Asus to have its software distributed on the manufacturer's PCs.

    The report points to Flipboard as another example of a mobile-only app that can be run on Windows and Mac machines using BlueStacks, with BlueStacks noting that the potential for Windows and Mac compatibility could help mobile developers decide to target Android as their initial platforms rather than iOS.
    Beta versions of BlueStacks' software for Mac and Windows can be downloaded from the company's website.

    Article Link: BlueStacks' Android App Player for Mac Moves into Beta with Support for All 750,000+ Apps
  2. macrumors regular

    Sep 22, 2012
    The Digital Frontier
    I don't know. Sounds like a Google has started a shell corporation just make it seems like their apps are more accessible than Apple's.

    Also it sound like they just took their SDK and just remove the development part but just left in the emulator in it. Nothing new.
  3. macrumors regular

    Jul 14, 2008
    "For example, there’s currently no way to use Instagram without an iOS or Android device."

    I'd say that's a good thing! Sick of square pictures with horrible colors and people who think they just made a good looking photo.
  4. macrumors 68040


    Mar 27, 2009
    Seattle, WA
    We should be able to do this with iOS apps as well. I think it would be cool to run some of my iOS apps in the corner of my ACD.
  5. dokujaryu, Dec 27, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2012

    macrumors 6502


    May 3, 2011
    Irvine, California
    I doubt that since the Android emulator is barely functional. They probably wrote something from "scratch". I have to put "scratch" in air quotes due to the plethora of open source software surrounding android.
  6. macrumors newbie

    Oct 12, 2012

    Especially for more ad revenue.....
  7. macrumors 65816

    Apr 24, 2010
    Wow, some of the crappiest mobile apps around can now lag, er, I mean "run" on my Mac?!?!

    Pinch me, I must be dreaming. :)
  8. macrumors 6502a

    Nov 21, 2005
    Orlando, Florida
    Well, I'm happy for folks that feel like they need to run Android apps on other platforms, but I personally doubt I'll ever use this. I can't think of one native Android app that I need that doesn't have an equivalent on iOS.
  9. macrumors 601


    Aug 19, 2003
    It's an interesting idea. Are all the companies (and apps) shown on their Web site supporting this? Or is BlueStack doing this without permission?

    For example, they show the Twitter logo yet this sounds like something Twitter would flip out about.
  10. macrumors 6502a


    Jun 28, 2010
    Which makes sense, if you're an ad-based company, numbers mean a lot.
  11. macrumors 6502

    Apr 30, 2010
    You can't run iOS apps on your Mac though (at least, consumers can't). I'm sure it's coming though.
  12. macrumors member


    Oct 19, 2009
    Along with the Android-based malware? Will we be at risk for that?? :confused:
  13. macrumors regular

    May 6, 2012
    This is going to not go well. This is basically a fancy emulator and the problem is when software is made to run in a certain environment it never works in another. Anyone else tried to do an N64 emulator or something and play it on your PC? It's just not the same.
  14. macrumors 68030


    Sep 6, 2007
    Not something that interests me. Maybe some Mac users might like it, but seems like a waste. I'd be way more interested in running my iOS apps on my Mac, but even at that, it would be minimal. I just don't see too many applications here.

    Now... run iOS Apps on AppleTV and let me control with my iPhone or iPad... that's what I'm talking about! :D
  15. InfoTime, Dec 27, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 27, 2012

    macrumors 6502

    Jul 17, 2002
    Weather forecast for the date of the approval of this app in the Mac App Store:

  16. macrumors 6502

    Oct 27, 2012
    Up your ass.
  17. macrumors 6502a


    Jul 23, 2009
    You mean you don't like seeing me in a picture doing something random like smiling next to a Walmart while using 43 different filters so my face looks like it's made of plastic?
  18. macrumors 601


    Jan 6, 2004
    Western US
    Why the hell would anyone want to run Android apps on their desktop?
  19. macrumors 6502a


    Feb 1, 2011
    My girlfriend has many friends who use "What's App". However, "What's App" has no Desktop version and she has no smartphone. So she installed bluestacks and "What's App".
  20. macrumors 68040

    Apr 6, 2007
    They would be no more crappy than the iOS ones...dont start thinking for 1 second that iOS apps are any more "pro" than Android apps :rolleyes:


    Probably for the same reason they would want to run iOS apps on the desktop.

    Silly question really...
  21. RMo
    macrumors 65816

    Aug 7, 2007
    Iowa, USA
    Which reminds me: I'm sure I'll be glad when this finished and working because I'm dying to use the Twitter app on my desktop, given that there's currently no other way to access it. :rolleyes:

    (But I could actually see this being useful in other cases. I haven't used Android much, but there are some iOS apps without desktop equivalents that I would understand if some people wanted to use. I'm sure it's the same here.)
  22. macrumors 6502

    Feb 26, 2010
    Awesome, was able to install get free apps from Amazon, get free MP3 credits, all without having to buy Android!



    It's not the Apps that's the problem.....
  23. macrumors 6502

    Oct 18, 2007
    If this is just the Android SDK's emulator (which is Android running on a ARM emulator) it would be unusably slow. But I don't think it is the Android SDK's ARM emulator.

    I imagine that they built a layer that does something like the Android x86 port, so that the Android bits are actually compiled for x86. I haven't been able to confirm that, but I've read that this doesn't run apps with native ARM code (but pure Java/Dalvik runs fine), and that people are expecting them to add an ARM emulator later. So that leaves me to believe this is running an x86 version and not an ARM emulator (and not an emulator at all, in the same way that WINE Is Not an Emulator).

    What evidence do we have that this is a shell corporation of Googles? In any case, Android apps are in fact more accessible because Android is open source and anyone can build off of that. I mean, I can take the x86 port of Android and install it on any x86 machine (or virtual machine) and run pure Java/Dalvik apps on it. And we've already had something equivalent to BlueStacks for Mac by just taking Android x86 and running it on VMWare Fusion, VirtualBox, or Parallels (though maybe BlueStacks has significant advantages over that).

    What I'm interested in is if BlueStacks can be used by developers as an alternative to the horribly slow Android SDK's emulator. I don't see why not.
  24. macrumors 68040

    Apr 6, 2007
    Would you care to share what you think the problem is then?
  25. macrumors 6502a


    Apr 29, 2009
    Chicago, IL
    In other news, a man today went to a fine restaurant, ordered the swordfish, and then put ketchup on it. ;)

Share This Page