BlueStacks' GamePop Console Bringing iOS Games to TVs

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jun 7, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    While we've covered work by BlueStacks to bring Android apps to Macs and PCs, the company has an even more interesting announcement to make today, revealing that its upcoming GamePop set-top box designed to offer subscription mobile gaming on TVs will also include support for iOS games. 9to5Mac has more on the developments, which include word that Fieldrunners developer Subatomic Studios will be the first major partner on the service.
    [​IMG]
    GamePop's subscription service is priced at $6.99 per month, with the company offering a free set-top box and controller to customers signing up for a one-year contract before the end of the month. After that, the box and controller will cost $129.

    Apple has been rumored to be looking at opening up its Apple TV platform to third-party applications, perhaps alongside a new television set product. When Apple launched the redesigned Apple TV in late 2010, Steve Jobs noted that the company could launch an Apple TV App Store when the time is right, but the company has yet to announce any efforts in that direction.

    Article Link: BlueStacks' GamePop Console Bringing iOS Games to TVs
     
  2. macrumors 68000

    Porco

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    #2
    Free marketing tip for GamePop in future: In publicity photos, don't cover up half your logo so it looks like 'gamepoo'. :D
     
  3. macrumors 603

    troop231

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    #3
    Great catch! Maybe it was intentional :p
     
  4. macrumors 68040

    MonkeySee....

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #4
    haha. Great spot!
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2013
    Location:
    in a ziplock bag inside a car's trunk
    #5
    oh, yeah. i would like to play clash of clans on a pc. nothing better than a game that takes hours to accomplish anything unless you fork out money for in-game currency.
     
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2012
    #6
    The aesthetics of it seem really nice, but a little impractical...
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #7
    I don't see this working out well for iOS developers who choose to use it. The "only" thing that devs need to do (switch payment mechanism) is something that has a remarkably high chance of getting their app rejected.

    :confused:

    I certainly don't wish failure upon them, I simply don't see how this will be accepted by Apple unless gamePop actually comes to some explicit agreement with Apple.
     
  8. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #8
    I certainly understand that this is a lot more ambitious than just streaming games to the Apple TV, but the article on 9to5 is being a bit hyperbolic with phrases like "today it becomes the first to bring iOS games to the TV."

    Well, no, I can play Jetpack Joyride on my TV right now with an Apple TV. Any of the 'touch-the-screen-anywhere' games work just fine this way.

    I wish BlueStack success with this, but the reporters should focus on the important part here which is the alleged controller integration.
     
  9. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    #9
    Airplay already does this
     
  10. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    #10
    and why would I pay for this subscription when I can mirror my device over Apple TV?
     
  11. macrumors 65816

    tevion5

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Location:
    UCD, Ireland
    #11
    Maybe they were trying to associate themselves with these guys :p

    http://m.youtube.com/#/show/gamerpoop?&desktop_uri=%2Fshow%2Fgamerpoop
     
  12. macrumors 65832

    Tankmaze

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    #12
    this kind of move sort of reminds me of openfeint. with their social network leaderboard, etc... it's all good. until apple announce game center.

    they can be the first to market this. but when apple comes late to the party, apple can be the winner.
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    #13
    Disgruntled employee?
     
  14. macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #14
    Mirroring introduced a lot of lag that makes any game that requires fast, accurate input difficult to play.

    I don't know how much better gamepop would be - as I'm still trying to wrap my head around what exactly it is! There's a console box, and a controller 'like none you've seen before'. Where does the iOS device fit into this system? Or does the console replace the iOS device and just play iOS games? If so, does it connect to the App Store? Or will it just play iOS compatible games hosted on its own store? And if so, does that violate Apple's T&Cs?

    Very confused..
     
  15. macrumors 6502

    FakeWozniak

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    #15
    If you look at the only place the company name shows up in the picture for this article, you might get a laugh.

    Update: Darn, didn't read the other postings first. I guess that what I found most interesting about this article is the same thing others did.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    #16

    Nice :)
     
  17. macrumors 6502

    FakeWozniak

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    #17
    Interesting thought, but what if they come to market now with some hack hardware that doesn't sell, get all their games ready for the TV format, then WHEN Apple does come out with a TV, they are first to market for Apples AppleTV App Store.

    I wouldn't be surprised if they already have developers working on an jailbroken AppleTV. This is a good gamble if you want to be running out of the starting gate.
     
  18. benarmstrong, Jun 7, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2013

    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    #18
    Hi there,

    We won't be mirroring at all. The device will run natively on the console using our API layer. If you want to do an IAP, you can no problem using another payment method through Amazon or Google. The games will be on our cloud and don't touch any Apple bits so it does not violate any T/Cs or the Developer Guidelines.

    You can download our companion app on your iPhone, iPad or Android device and use that to play the games, or you can use the included controller. We do all the device mappings ourselves to ensure that no lag occurs and the experience is seamless for the user.

    - Ben from BlueStacks
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    AppleMark

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Location:
    The CCTV Capital of the World
    #19
    But it is native to the device and not to the ATV itself.
     
  20. macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #20
    Thanks for the clarification!

    Technically, that sounds more interesting to me than mirroring, which IME isn't responsive enough for many genres of games. The game running on the device, with Bluetooth(?) controller sounds much better - if it's a good controller.

    I wonder about the legal side of it. Although you say you're not using any Apple bits, I don't know if there's any restriction from Apple about usage of iOS/Cocoa apps outside the app store. (i.e. something along the lines of "if you submit this specific app to the App Store, you can't sell it anywhere else" or "If you develop an app using Xcode/the iOS SDK, you cannot deploy to non-iOS devices").

    Anyway, sounds good. Hope either: a) this is a great gaming option, or b) it prods Apple into action.
     
  21. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    #21
    Meh. Most of the good games are made for the small touchscreen. And won't transfer well to tv and controller.

    You can't use a touch screen to things if you're looking at the tv screen.
     
  22. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2013
    #22
    OnLive is a service providing a similar functionality that seems to be available on iOS. You can effectively use Windows apps on iOS. The service also supports games, but I can't seem to verify if the OnLine Desktop Client supports the gaming plans or not. There would certainly be overlap where software available on iOS could be used on the virtual Windows machine instead, but in the OnLive's case, the primary goal is to enable access to software NOT available on iOS (Flash and Office, primarily).

    In BlueStack's case, many of the Android games in question will have iOS counterparts, so it will be interesting to see how this plays out. Apple definitely needs to make a decision on how to handle this NOW. They'd better not approve it and then later change their mind when it becomes popular (like AppGratis). They've got to start doing a better job thinking apps like this through. The press loves to eat them alive when they pull a popular app. Rejecting an app no one has ever heard of is a far safer move .
     
  23. macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #23
    From what I know of both services, gamepop will be a little different in that the iOS games will be running on non-Apple devices, as opposed to being streamed from another device/server. That may bring its own legal interpretations and issues.

    As I understand it, the only thing Apple would need to approve is the (optional) controller app for iPhone. If you just use the device's physical controller, there's nothing for Apple to approve. However, there's always scope for a legal challenge, and Apple could always changes the App Store T&Cs to make it awkward for app developers to make their apps compatible with the box.
     
  24. macrumors 65816

    Wayfarer

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    #24
    Cool Story Bro

    Doesn't Apple TV already do this through Airplay? :confused::confused::confused:
     
  25. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    #25
    So they're introducing a subscription service to allow you to play games that you own already on your tv? This seems like a terrible business model. A device you buy once, sure. A $7 fee forever? What the hell?
     

Share This Page