Brightcove CEO Envisions His Dream Apple Television and Set-Top Box

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Dec 17, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    In a guest post on AllThingsD, Brightcove founder and CEO Jeremy Allaire offers a thorough look at his ideals for a television initiative from Apple. While Allaire has no direct knowledge of Apple's plans, his perspective gained by leading one of the major online video platforms for mainstream media offers an interesting basis for discussion on what Apple may wish to do.

    Allaire describes three "key values" that he expects Apple will bring to consumers with its television initiative: an integrated system for delivering all types of television content including broadcast, video-on-demand, Netflix, and Youtube; the "ultimate game console" leveraging the existing iOS ecosystem; and innovative app experiences enhancing existing App Store apps with dual screens. He argues that Apple will need to offer both integrated television sets and a set-top box in order to make the necessary impact in the market.
    The set-top box Allaire envisions a relatively thin bar-like design to sit above or below an existing television, based on an A7 quad-core chip and offering several cameras and sensors, HDMI, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, substantial storage, and Lightning ports for power and a coaxial cable dongle.

    [​IMG]
    As for the television set itself, Allaire's scenario includes 46-inch and 60-inch models with multiple HDMI ports, an optical audio port, Ethernet, and dual Lightning ports for connectivity. The sets would include onboard storage of either 1 TB and 3 TB, and of course incorporate a high-end display in a package carrying the usual Apple design aesthetic.

    Allaire goes on to describe an Apple TV app for iOS that would serve as the hub for interacting with the system, delivering guide information, on-demand libraries, and iTunes Store access to an iPhone or iPad, as well as allowing the device to serve second-screen content while viewing on the television set. Apple would also deliver APIs for third-party input devices such as game controllers, as well as tools for helping delivers create both dedicated apps for the TV and expand their existing iOS apps to address new possibilities opened up by the larger-screen environment.

    Allaire's vision is of course entirely speculative and seems to be more of a "wish list" rather than a serious proposal for how Apple will bring cable operators onboard and integrate a host of features into a set-top box starting at $149 or a television set starting at $1499, but some of the proposals offer interesting food for thought about directions Apple could be aiming for.

    Article Link: Brightcove CEO Envisions His Dream Apple Television and Set-Top Box
     
  2. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
  3. macrumors 65816

    JaySoul

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
  4. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #4
    People replace their television set every 4 years?! I do very well for myself, and I think my replacement cycle is nearly double that.
     
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
  6. macrumors 603

    justperry

    #6
    No way, Apple is all about streaming content, they won't go anything bigger than needed, 8-16 GB Max.
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    #7
    The most amazing addition would be wireless IR sensors to put on other devices (Blu-Ray Player, DVR, Stereo, etc) so that your AppleTV could control all the devices using an iPad Mini.

    I have the Harmony 1100 now, but the interface is lacking, the sensors are all wired. Leaves major room for improvement.

    That would make it complete IMHO.
     
  8. macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #8
    I think most are excited about the TV set, not another set top box. (please don't just be another set top box)
     
  9. macrumors 6502

    coolant113

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #9
    I agree with almost everything he envisions except for one thing. That putting "1tb to 3tb" of storage either in the set top box or the tv itself. Why would apple do that? They have been on a mission to move everything into the cloud. The first generation Apple TV had a lot of onboard storage, then they introduced the 2nd and 3rd generation Apple TV that was only designed to work off the "cloud". I really don't think apple will go backwards and put that much onboard storage into one of these future devices. They will mend this into the "cloud".
     
  10. macrumors 601

    goobot

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Location:
    long island NY
    #10
    Apple is working on the input method, it is the reason why the Mac was popular with the mouse, the iPod was popular with click wheel, iPhone was popular with multi-touch screen along with the iPad, and the MacBooks with a multi-touch trackpad. Steve said it himself, you need a good input method to have a successful device.
     
  11. charlieegan3, Dec 17, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2012

    macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #11
    Connectivity to what?
     
  12. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #12
    Ditto!

    Our last TV was purchased about 5 years ago, and it's still going strong. If there's nothing wrong with it, it doesn't get replaced. You'd be a fool to buy a new TV just for the sake of it. They really dont change enough to warrant purchasing a new one.
     
  13. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #13
    I'd bet that the TV would have Siri and the box wouldn't
     
  14. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #14
    I wont be interested if its 60". That's just stupid. They need about 4 different models:

    32" 36" 42" and 48"

    Any bigger and its no longer a TV, it's a cinema.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    jamesryanbell

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
  16. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    #16
    Mine is when one breaks.

    I may look into a revolutionary new device if available.

    In general I like small stuff to lift and carry around (like a projector)
    instead of a 52 inch or larger TV.

    Plus, the cinema experience (really big screen) you can only get with a projector depending on you home's/apartment's wall sizes:)
     
  17. macrumors 68000

    TMar

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Location:
    Ky
    #17
    "multiple HDMI ports"

    You'll be lucky to have one HDMI port. The way Apple see things they will want all your content to come through them.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    #18
    for Apple TV to be more successful, they need some sort of live channels. People need to be able to just turn on Apple TV, sit on the couch and turn off their brains for a while.
     
  19. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #19
    Most input methods have already been done for TV. If its something new, it'll be something that nobody has heard of / seen before.

    As it stands, we have:

    - Remote
    - Voice
    - Hand Gestures
    - Keyboard/Mouse
    - Remote App's for mobiles

    Cant see them coming up with a better alternative than any of these.
     
  20. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #20
    Apple would/should release a radically redesigned iTV before ever entering the actual TV market. An Apple TV that essentially converts your existing set into a giant iPad, that you run all your devices (Cable box, Bluray...) from your iOS device. They are so close now I just don't understand why they don't finish the job. The Apple TV right now is half baked.
     
  21. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #21
    We already do that. It's called TiVo :p

    ----------

    It's Apple TV, not iTV. iTV is a television network, older than Apple who would never let Apple use their trademark.
     
  22. macrumors 604

    ArtOfWarfare

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    #22
    Good?

    Good?

    Really?

    Come on, really?

    Steve never said the word good to describe products he made or sold.

    To Steve, everything was either great or crap (in extreme circumstances, he could insert the word insanely or s***, or even b***s***)
     
  23. macrumors 68020

    pgiguere1

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    #23
    You could say it the other way around: 32" isn't a TV, it's a monitor.

    Seriously though, 4 sizes is a lot of options given that Apple usually has a streamlined lineup to minimize the costs of components through economy of scale and maximize profits.

    The original article has more realistic expectations than yours. Apple products are high-end. They're desired by rich people. 48" is smaller than what a lot of people would buy. That's what I have and I don't feel like it's a huge TV by any means. If I were richer I'd definitely get something bigger.

    It's not like the mobile market where too big of a screen means less portability. Modern LED-backlit TVs are so thin it doesn't really matter whether they're 40" or 60". Just use a wall mount if you want to save some space. It's really more of a money issue for people, but since Apple is used to get a near-monopoly of "premium" products it shouldn't be a problem. It's easier to have a large margin on expensive products.
     
  24. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Location:
    Central California
    #24
    oh god 'his dream'

    let's hope this rich guy fulfill his dreams :rolleyes:

    omg im going to puke
     
  25. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    #25
    $149 is wishful thinking

    The fellow predicts:
    A7 quad-core chip and offering several cameras and sensors, HDMI, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, substantial storage, and Lightning ports for power and a coaxial cable dongle.​

    I think all this for $149 is perhaps inspired by smoking a lot of whackyweed. Does he live in Colorado or Washington State? Just "substantial storage" is enough to make the thing cost $150.
     

Share This Page