If my house was on fire and after everything else I had time to grab a computer, I would grab the Mac first. Its the only place I trust for keeping family pix and movies. Digital hub for sure.
i know where you're going, but as i said, your situation has nothing to do with which is better. you may be tied to the PC by a few thousand dollars of software, but that will never make it better, even for you. it would still be better to get a mac, but you just can't afford it, so it's "better" to stick with the adequate solution. that's just a "can't afford to switch" thing.Originally posted by tazo
shadow makes a good point...
I can understand someones reasoning for having a pc and keeping it over buying a new mac, because if they have say the adobe suite [paid for] then it is not really economically feasible to pay that 800 dollar price tag again for the mac, even tho he or she might have a better user experience on the mac.
Ya get where i am going with this shadow? It all comes down to the economic feasibility and the almighty legal tender.
-tazo
heh, me to, know why? It cost twice what my 3.0GHz P4 PC did!!!Originally posted by lewdvig
If my house was on fire and after everything else I had time to grab a computer, I would grab the Mac first.
yeah, and you know what? it's over a million times better at getting viruses than a mac.Originally posted by leet1
A PC can do anything a Mac can and just as good. Theres no argueing this. It can also do it at a cheeper price also
Originally posted by shadowfax
yeah, and you know what? it's over a million times better at getting viruses than a mac.
Originally posted by shadowfax
yeah, and you know what? it's over a million times better at getting viruses than a mac.
Originally posted by stoid
Okay. For over a month our campus with heavy firewall and virus software installed was SO over run by the blaster virus that bandwidth used by the blaster virus was twice that of regular legit bandwidth usage. Apparently, it's not that easy to keep a Windows machine virus free.
Originally posted by stoid
I have the perfect virus protection package installed on my laptop, it's called Mac OS X. It's not a slice of swiss cheese, and therefore not vulnerable to viruses. The idea behind a Mac is that you don't have to be a tech geek just to do basic OS functions and have security on your machine. If it's too hard for a beginner to do beginner-type things, then in my book, it chalks up as a fat pile of ****.
Originally posted by lewdvig
The problem is creating an OS where every user has root priveleges. You can run arbitrary code easily on any PC.
Originally posted by leet1
firewall + virus scan
such a foolish comment: my roommate had all the latest updates to windows, a firewall up, and Norton antivirus going... he got hit by blaster several times, really messed him up, as well as tons of people here at OU who also have virus protection. my mac has no virus protection, and i am yet to get a trace of one.Originally posted by leet1
firewall + virus scan
Originally posted by lewdvig
Virus scan is great for last week's virus. But if I send you something new, it will own your box.
Unless you configure your Firewall properly you are not completely protected from the outside world.
This just adds a extra layer of complexity to a system. All this extra complexity to fix a core flaw.
Originally posted by shadowfax
such a foolish comment: my roommate had all the latest updates to windows, a firewall up, and Norton antivirus going...
it's different when you are on a college network, though.Originally posted by leet1
Kind of odd, so did I, and yet....I stayed virus free. Hmmm, strange.
There was nothing foolish about my comment, so pssh
Originally posted by shadowfax
it's different when you are on a college network, though.
i don't know. perhaps yours has better security. OU's security isn't particularly good. still, it's not the users' fault here though. it's just hard to keep up with all this stuff, and an insanely huge amount of trouble to bother, on everyone's part.Originally posted by leet1
I was on my colleges wireless network..... Am I missing something here? Whats the difference?
Originally posted by tazo
I am so tired of this rabid zealotism that pervades even what I call a mac website standard like Macrumors.