To use xcode 4.3 you had to have OSX 10.7.3. I did the upgrade that broke a number of PPC apps that I used and loved that are not updated any more. At that point I realized that it is better off to have separate hardware like a new Mac Mini, or what you recommended of installing a whole different OS and updating that firewire drive would work too.
The goal is to separate my day to day computer from my programming computer to avoid the next "You have to update to use the new xcode or other thing".
You just need two installs of Mac OS X then. I'm not quite sure what that entails, but I imagine it's similar to having Windows XP and OS X on your Mac on seperate partitions and using Boot Camp... Just have your programming version of OS X and your FCP compatibility version of OS X as installs on seperate partitions.
That's why I bought a Dell instead of a Thunberbolt Apple Screen.
They have a really good resolution (2560x1440).
And you are correct, it does have 2560x1600, only thing I didn't like, is to buy the expensive extension to get the resolution working on latest mac mini ;/
Expensive extension ? 4.73$ is expensive ?
6ft 32AWG Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable - White
Did you get the dual-link DVI adapter by mistake ?
With the standard they told me, you can't get the resolution out of it (I couldn't neither), so I had to buy an extension to get the full resolution out of it.
I couldve been badly misinformed, and then it would suck
Wait, are you using DVI ? Because the U3011 has 1 DisplayPort input. The DP input can support the full resolution of 2560x1600 with just a DP cable. The Mac Mini's TB port is a 1.1a DP port equivalent. You can just technically run a DP cable, which is 4.73$ from Monoprice.
If you're using DVI (there is no reason to use DVI at all, DP replaces it completely and is much superior), then yes, single link DVI cannot run that resolution, you need to use a mDP or TB to Dual Link DVI adapter which costs 99$.
But again, since the U3011 has a DP input... why even bother with DVI ?