Can we please do away with the voting system?

Discussion in 'Site and Forum Feedback' started by p0intblank, Sep 25, 2006.

  1. p0intblank macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #1
    This is in relation to Apple's recent update to Aperture. The latest thread about it has more negative votes than positive. This isn't right... how can an update to Aperture be negative? It's all the whiners who are voting negative; aka the ones who were waiting for a MacBook Pro upgrade and didn't get it. That has nothing to do with Aperture and photographers. If you're not a photographer, then simply do not vote.

    All these negative votes could be a turn off for some newcomers. They may see a discussion voted 75% negative and 25% positive and may just assume the product everyone is talking about is bad.

    This may seem like a rant because well... it is. I come here to discuss what I'm passionate about: Apple; and I'm sure many others here do as well. In my opinion the voting system does nothing but causes commotion, which is why I think it should be axed.

    [/rant]
     
  2. Allotriophagy macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2006
    #2
    That's as dumb an idea as an update being a bad thing.
     
  3. zwida macrumors 6502a

    zwida

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2001
    Location:
    NYC
    #3
    You make a good point. People's criteria for voting positive or negative seem so subjective as to be totally arbitrary.

    I can't see the vote system actually going away, but it's seemed pretty useless for a long time. It's more of a curiosity to see how the rest of the community reacts to something (regardless of their reasoning).
     
  4. bigandy macrumors G3

    bigandy

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Location:
    Murka
    #4
    i agree it should be removed, but for another reason: it serves no useful purpose. it hasn't for a long time.

    time to take it out back and shoot it.
     
  5. dsnort macrumors 68000

    dsnort

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Location:
    In persona non grata
  6. milo macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #6
    I completely agree. It serves NO purpose whatsoever and is completely worthless.

    More than anything, it's a way for lazy people to throw out a general "Apple Sux" on every topic.

    And much of the time, you can vote either way depending on how you interpret it.

    I'd LOVE to see it go away, it's more of an annoyance than anything useful.
     
  7. p0intblank thread starter macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #7
    It's not really dumb at all. Who's to say a person not familiar with computers glances at the discussion of a new Mac and jumps to bad thoughts? It may sound far-fetched, but it could happen.

    The point being... the voting system has no purpose at all. It only causes trouble.
     
  8. Kwyjibo macrumors 68040

    Kwyjibo

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2002
    #8
    why don't you just ignore it ... I'm going on a few years of not even reading that far ...
     
  9. scott523 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Location:
    St Charles, MO
    #9
    Yup I agree, you're (@ p0intblank) someone that like reads every little detail of the site (kinda like a nerd). Just ignore it. That voting system (even though it's funny how everyone reacts to this news) doesn't justify anything, it's the comments that counts.
     
  10. xsedrinam macrumors 601

    xsedrinam

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    #10
    Is this the thread you're referring to? I've browsed through it but don't see where you get "votes". Do you mean "posts", instead? Or is there another thread somewhere?
     
  11. vniow macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
    #11
    Its annoying. And its even more annoying when decent percentage of the comments are "why did this get a negative rating?"

    I say get rid of it.
     
  12. scott523 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Location:
    St Charles, MO
    #12
    The so-called voting system of each news can be seen on the front page of MacRumors.
     
  13. xsedrinam macrumors 601

    xsedrinam

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    #13
    Well it's a "rating" system. People from n00bs to pros will show up and post because it's a MacRumors' site. I don't know that doing away with the system will accomplish anything other than direct immature comments elsewhere. Maybe a 100 post minimum would help?
     
  14. Doctor Q Administrator

    Doctor Q

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #14
    Not great; not hurting much

    I'm not personally fond of the ratings systems, and I mostly ignore it. If people like to participate by voting for or against a story, I'm glad it makes them happy. I don't consider the tally to have much importance, but it's easy enough to pay it no attention.

    When "why did people vote negative?" posts appear, it can in effect mean "what do other people think of this news story?" so I don't think it derails the discussion.

    I wonder if voting results would be more meaningful if there were a set of attributes you could rate stories on, each on a 1-to-5 scale, the way some videogame magazines and websites rate game attributes. But what would they be for news stories?
     
  15. calculus Guest

    calculus

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    #15
    I never look at them myself. I don't think it adds anything but don't mind if they are there or not.
     
  16. macenforcer macrumors 65816

    macenforcer

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    #16
    It wasn't the aperture release that got negative, it was apple calling a special event and inviting the press for a point 5 update and not core 2 duo that gave it neg. It was LAME!
     
  17. bousozoku Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #17
    It is a professional photography exposition. Why would anyone think (maybe I should stop there) that it would be computer hardware related?

    The voting is a bit useless because anyone can do it. You don't have to be a member. You just have to be able to click.

    Why worry about it?
     
  18. p0intblank thread starter macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #18
    This is EXACTLY what I am talking about! People like you... why don't you understand this was a photography event and not a consumer electronics event? Get it through your head already. And didn't Apple's invitation clearly have a graphic of a camera lens on it? That has to tell you something.

    scott523, I do consider myself to be a geek/nerd. I guess that's why I look at every little detail. :eek:

    Edit: And yes, it was the Aperture 1.5 announcement that received way too many negatives. Again if the story does not apply to you (i.e. non-photographers), then don't vote.
     
  19. 2nyRiggz macrumors 603

    2nyRiggz

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Location:
    Thank you Jah...I'm so Blessed
    #19
    I never voted on the stories but when I come to MR and read the front page and see the voting percentage of the story it makes me want to see why it got the votes it did. Sometimes it is interesting to see why people thinks its negative/positive but other times its just BS.



    Bless
     
  20. milo macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #20
    I'd be very happy if that's what it did.

    And here's a perfect example of why the voting is worthless. People are mad, but there's no story about the thing they're mad about, so they vote negative on whatever is handy. Stupid and a waste of time.
     
  21. SilentPanda Moderator emeritus

    SilentPanda

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Bamboo Forest
    #21
    Nobody knows what is being voted on which makes the vote tally completely arbitrary... they don't annoy me as I don't look at the front page hardly ever (I'm a new posts/forum spy addict) but the votes could be a deterrent to a new user... I have a notion that the majority of the votes are negatives due to people wanting other things but not if the update to Aperture in itself is a good/bad thing.

    Heck some people might be voting on if the article is well written or not...

    I was kinda hoping this thread was about getting rid of polls though... ah well... :)
     
  22. thedude110 macrumors 68020

    thedude110

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    #22
    Exactly right.

    It's beyond me why we'd want to get rid of something that encourages more folks to interact with the community.

    If you don't like the results, you're welcome to start a thread like this about them. But I think calling the the voting system "worthless" or saying that it serves "no purpose" misses a fundamental idea: we're not bound by Apple, but by interacting in a community about Apple.
     
  23. milo macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #23
    Why is it a good thing to encourage people to interact? This is a rumor site, what's wrong with people coming and getting their rumors? Personally, I don't think people need any encouragement, too much interaction is the electronic equivalent of pissing on a wall.

    What does that even mean? If you're saying that the interaction is more important than the rumors about apple, I think you'd be better off finding a nice happy little chat site. I stand by my statement that the ratings are worthless and serve no purpose. Worse than that, they give the false impression that they do serve a purpose - the last thing I want to see is someone citing the rating in an attempt to back up an argument.
     
  24. kjr39 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    #24
    Well, I have to say, after reading this entire thread, I am going to have to give it 2 stars.
     
  25. arn macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #25
    :)

    The voting system was actually removed when the site was redesigned a few years ago, but was quickly brought back due complaints about it being removed.

    The voting system is entirely arbitrary, no one (including myself) knows what a vote really means or is supposed to mean. It's just one of those quirks of the site.

    It probably does give people some involvement in the story/site by expressing their love/hate for a story... again, in an ambigious but strangely satisfying way.

    There may be a slight reformatting of the front page in the coming months, so I'll consider changing and/or removing it at that time, but prob not before then.

    arn
     

Share This Page