Canadians: How do you like your health care system?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by alex_ant, Jul 15, 2005.

  1. alex_ant macrumors 68020

    alex_ant

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    All up in your bidness
    #1
    It's obvious to anyone with a brain that the health care system is in the US is horribly broken, with something like 40 million people uninsured, massive costs, people trying to import prescription drugs from other countries, HMOs that compromise quality of care, etc. I think the Left in the US would ideally like to institute a Canada-style single-payer system, but do not pursue this because they view it as impossible to get done given that the Republicans are in control. Everything I've heard Canadians say about their own system has been a rave, and apparently even conservative Canadians like their system. Everything negative I've heard about it has come from the Cato Institute or other U.S. right-wing source which describes it as "socialized medicine" (which it isn't) under which people "often die waiting months for treatment" (is this true?) So what's the story, Canadians? And to Americans: what do you think about health-care reform, either to a Canadian-style system or some other kind of system? I'm already aware of the benefits and alleged drawbacks of a single-payer system but if you don't support one, why not?

    I will disclose beforehand that I am inclined to view Canada's health care system rather favorably, although all I know about it is what I've read.
     
  2. alex_ant thread starter macrumors 68020

    alex_ant

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    All up in your bidness
  3. Thomas Veil macrumors 68020

    Thomas Veil

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Location:
    Reality
    #3
    As a commie liberal, I'm interested in hearing some responses as well.
     
  4. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #4
    I know you're only kidding, but what is it with this identification of "commie" with "liberal" over there? The two philosophies have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
     
  5. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #5
    They are synonomous here. As is 'socialist' 'environmentalist' and 'elitist'. You may also substitute 'Volvo driver' 'latte drinker' 'card-carrying-member-of-the-ACLU' or 'sushi eater'. Such is the branding power of the right wing media machine.
     
  6. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #6
    No wonder your politicians don't make any sense.
     
  7. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #7
    :D

    Among other reasons, yes.
     
  8. CanadaRAM macrumors G5

    CanadaRAM

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Location:
    On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
    #8
    OK, I'll weigh in.
    If I am injured or take sick, any hospital in Canada will treat me, I don't have to prove I have a private insurance plan or a platinum card. My government medical premiums were $108 a month for a family of 4. People on reduced income pay less, under $20,000 income pay nothing.
    http://www.healthservices.gov.bc.ca/msp/infoben/premium.html

    We do have waiting lists -- not very often for anything critical. Some diagnostics and medical imaging have waits, which arguably could affect health is something remains undetected for additional days or weeks. However, I was able to get a scan done within about five days of the appointment. Optional procedures sometimes have months-long waits. This is due to an overall shortage of funding in the system. Example: You may wait 6 months for a surgical spot for hip replacement surgery, but then it's free.

    ("Often die while waiting months for treatment" - Utter rot. Propagandists can make a generality out of any isolated snippets of information, regardless if they are true in general or the specific. Has anyone ever died in Canada while waiting for surgery. Probably, although even one death is one death too many. Was the wait unreasonable and the proximate cause of death? Unlikely. Does it happen often, or even occasionally? Absolutely not. Exercise: Compare with the number of people who have died in the US while being transferred from one hospital to another when they weren't accepted for admittance at the nearest hospital...)

    I would like to see more preventative medicine / proactive healthy living programmes in place - this will reduce the load on the medical system - we are slowly creeping our way towards that.

    But what I have seen of other medical systems (I have seen them in the US and in Greece), I would not trade the Canadian system for any other.
     
  9. alex_ant thread starter macrumors 68020

    alex_ant

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    All up in your bidness
    #9
    I understand completely. But how can you submit to all this without being a socialist liberal pinko commie bastard? I mean it makes too much SENSE. It works too well. There's gotta be a catch. What is it???? Surely your health care system must crush your freedoms in some way??? Help terrorists? Coddle dictators? Punish the wealthy? Somehow?? Please explain for the benefit of the U.S. conservatives and libertarians in the audience who would vehemently oppose this type of (seemingly pragmatic but, I'm sure, secretly sinister) system.
     
  10. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #10
    What would be the point? You can't hear anything when your head is stuck up your own arse.
     
  11. anonymous161 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Location:
    Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
    #11
    US healthcare will not move to "socialist" medicine because too many people stand to lose financially. Doctors, drug companies, and in particular the insurance industry would be lose too much money. That is where all the propaganda comes from and most republicans and conservative believe it because they don't want a socialized system to be better than a free market. That and the people that make most of these decisions have never had to worry about how to pay their medical bills and those same people have a hard time caring whether 40 million other people have can go to the doctor or not.
     
  12. fistful macrumors 6502a

    fistful

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Location:
    Socan
    #12
    I don't really have a problem with it but then I've been relatively healthy so far.


    alex_ant, you forgot "bleeding heart"...
     
  13. alex_ant thread starter macrumors 68020

    alex_ant

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    All up in your bidness
    #13
    If the conservatives in the house won't step up and argue it then I will

    This is what you hear in the U.S.:

    http://www.pacificresearch.org/pub/sab/health/speech_sally.html
    http://www.effwa.org/opeds/2004_05_27b.php

    I particularly like the health savings accounts idea, as I happen to have just enough cash in my life savings to be able to afford a splint for a broken finger (although I would have to put the ER visit itself on a credit card). Surely if all taxes and government regulations and frivolous lawsuits were eliminated, the free market would burst forth like an unbridled stallion, raining money into my savings account, while health care costs simultaneously plumetted due to the increased efficiency.
     
  14. anonymous161 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Location:
    Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
    #14
    Regardless of whether this information about Canada is true or not,let's take a look at the systems in the UK or France or one of numerous other countries that seem to make this system work. Surely Canada is not the most successful.

    We don't even have to move to "socialized" medicine, the 300 some odd billion that has been spent in Iraq/Afganistan would probably pay the health insurance premiums for every US citizen this year.
     
  15. Thanatoast macrumors 6502a

    Thanatoast

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Location:
    Denver
    #15
    Why should I pay for somebody else's healthcare? Just because they didn't plan ahead doesn't mean that i should give up my hard-earned income. I work hard for my bread and my insurance premium. If someone else can't work hard enough to earn that, why should the onus fall on me?

    It's like theivery. Everybody loves Robin Hood, but what if he came to *your* hosue? He wouldn't be quite so popular if he stole from *you*, would he?

    Even if the costs worked themselves out to be cheaper with this socialized medicine system, I would still be against it. It's the principle. Making someone better-off pay for someone unlucky enough to be stuck working at Taco Bell is wrong, regarless of whether the well-off person can "afford" it.

    The unlucky person should pull himself up by his bootstraps and get a better job, or more education. There's no reason why that shouldn't be possible. We have tons of technical, vocational, 2- and 4-year colleges who would love to teach that person new skills. Any number of people have done it in the past. Why not this generation? Are they just lazy? Expecting a free ride?

    Life is only as tough as you yourself make it out to be. Dedication and hard work will get you as far as you want to go. If an individual only wants to work hard enough to get a fast-food job with no insurance, then they can do so without my pity and without my taxes.
     
  16. CanadaRAM macrumors G5

    CanadaRAM

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Location:
    On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
    #16
    Gotta pick up some of those ones

    > Canadian system suffers from ... increasing costs to taxpayers and patients

    Doh! and here I thought medical costs were going up in other countries too. Only in Canada are costs increasing ?!? Gonna have to move.

    > Canada tied for last place when it came to the number of lithotriptors

    Wrong metric. Why don't you count whether there is a deficit in the demand vs. supply of procedures, rather than counting the machines? Not saying there isn't a deficit in some communities of some types of advanced equipment.

    > private health care and user "ownership" over health care choices is the key to more cost-effective and customer driven results.

    Private health care = private profits. I submit there is far more waste in the private system. Look at the relative cost of procedures and hospital stays.
    User ownership is a code word for "pay for it yourself and the devil take the hindmost"

    > Canada ranks in the bottom half of the nations in the study when it comes to life expectancy

    That is a truly misleading statement. I am going to make a study of the top 4 math students in your class. I find that the scores are 99, 98, 97 and 96. Your score was 97, so I conclude you are the bottom half of all students in the study when it comes to mathematical abilities.

    The true story is that Canada is variously listed as 7th to 11th in the entire world at L.E. of 79.4 years. USA is back in the 30th or 40th position, at 77.1 years. (US Census Bureau data)

    http://geography.about.com/library/weekly/aa042000b.htm

    > When it comes to health care expenditures as a percentage of GDP, Canada ranks highest out of the 28 industrialized OECD nations included in the survey. Canadian taxpayers are not getting a very good deal for this expenditure.

    Right. Other countries spend far less taxpayer dollars on medicine, and their population pays $1000's or $tens of thousands a year on private medical insurance. And the lower X% of the population simply do not get medical services. Wanna bet that the insurance expenditures were not calculated into the statement above?

    I find the cynical manipulation of information to influence opinion to be so... cynical.
     
  17. CanadaRAM macrumors G5

    CanadaRAM

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Location:
    On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
    #17
    Trying to decide whether this is serious.... satirical.... serious.... satirical....
    (gives up)

    If you look at this post as satire, it succeeds, splendidly.
     
  18. anonymous161 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Location:
    Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
    #18

    I think I will call this the Middle Class Manisfesto
     
  19. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #19
    The ambiguity is very piquant.... :eek: :D :eek: :D :eek: :D :confused:
     
  20. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #20
    ...asks the man who hasn't donated to MR ;-)

    well played, sir.
     
  21. alex_ant thread starter macrumors 68020

    alex_ant

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    All up in your bidness
    #21
    So you are opposed to all insurance, or just government-run insurance programs? Since under a single-payer system, you are not paying directly for anyone else's health care, but rather for insurance, just like the current U.S. system...
     
  22. alex_ant thread starter macrumors 68020

    alex_ant

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    All up in your bidness
  23. miloblithe macrumors 68020

    miloblithe

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2003
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #23
    Think about what you're saying a little more and you'll realize that it makes absolutely no sense. Are you seriously saying we can have a nation where there are no service jobs? There is going to be a division of labor and there are going to be fast food jobs. It's a very misleading approach to look at it on an individual basis. Sure, any particular person in the fast food industry might be able to get a better job, but that doesn't change the fact that millions of people will work in the industry.

    And more fundamentally, we need to respect each other a little more as human beings. There are people who are more successful and people who are less successful than anyone.
     
  24. Peterkro macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
    #24
    How very neanderthal of you.Best wishes paying for your own socialised services.I never before knew socialised could be used as a derogatory term,you learn something every day.
    :confused:
     
  25. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #25
    I think it's a wind-up. Anyway, homo sapiens neanderthalensis had a bigger brain than homo sapiens sapiens... :cool:
     

Share This Page