Canon Gear Help

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by mac26, Jan 1, 2013.

  1. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    #1
    Hello!
    I am interested in photography and I would like to purchase a DSLR. I know a few things about the aperture, the exposure, ISO, etc... From playing around with my Uncle's T1i and reading a few pieces about photography. I have already also decided on Canon because like many say in this forum "the most comfortable camera is the one you should pick" and I much prefer Canon's ergonomics IMO. I will probably shoot portraits, landscapes, and maybe some nature shots

    So now onto my dilemma; I want to get a x0D series because of the little settings screen on the top of the camera and the feel and weight compared to a rebel series. I have a budget of $800 and I plan on keeping the DSLR for 4 to 5 years. I am also planning on getting it used if I can save some money and get some better gear that way. Here are my options:
    - Canon 60D + 50mm f/1.8 lens (standard zoom or macro lens, or recommend me a lens later on)
    - Canon 40D + 70-200mm f/4 lens (50mm later on)

    The 60D package costs 750
    The 40D package costs 800
    The benefits of the 60D package is the smaller more compact design of the camera, more megapixels, everything is brand new and sealed, its cheaper, and its the most recent model, the 40D package benefits are it has a good lens although its a bit older of a camera and the more expensive deal
    I am leaning to the 60D because its new and I am eventually going to buy new better lenses later on anyways.

    Any input guys? And any recommendations for a <$500 lens to save up for if I get the 60D? Any photography tips?

    Thanks all!
     
  2. macrumors 68000

    mofunk

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Location:
    Americas
    #2
    I'm not a Canon user. But I've shot with both of those cameras. 60D is a great camera. Shutter speed is nice and the focusing is fast. I would go with that. After shooting with the 50mm lens for a few months, rent your next lens to see if you like it. I suggest maybe a 24-70mm to go with the 50mm or something on the wide end like a 10-22mm range.
     
  3. thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    #3
    Thanks for the reply, how is the 24-70? What situations is this lens good for? If I got one it'd be a used one from Sigma or Tamron. Great idea on renting a lens before choosing the second lens

    Thanks for the tips! :)
     
  4. Designer Dale, Jan 1, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2013

    macrumors 68040

    Designer Dale

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Location:
    Folding space
    #4
    Please note that the 40d is no longer made. The 60d is, but I wouldn't bet on it being around in production for long with Canon pushing the T series for the Rebel line. A 60d and lens at BH Photo and Video is around $1000. The 7d may soon be the sole crop frame camera in the EOS line of pro cameras.

    Disclaimer: I have a 7d that replaced an XSI.

    My main lens is a Tamron 24-75 f/2.8. It's. Great lens. Around 600 new.

    The 60d may be sealed, but it's not really a sealed system unless the lens is sealed, too. Only the very best of the best Canon L lenses are weather sealed.

    Dale
     
  5. thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    #5
    I am aware that the 40D is discontinued and I understand the x0D series has been neglected since the T2i/7D but I find them the perfect being more prosumer than the TXi series. I also can't afford a 7D and the package I have found is pretty much the only one that I can afford. Thanks for the help anyways :)

    Edit: by the way by sealed I meant its in an unopened box :)
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    NZed

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Location:
    Canada, Eh?
    #6
    I would always say go with the better lens, but if you have the money, go with the 60D and get some nice glass later.
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    #7
    There's a more than likely chance that a 60D replacement will be on its way in 2013, possibly as early as in the next month or two. Canon may make an announcement at CES next week. You could wait and get the 60D replacement, or pick up the 60D when they discount it:

    http://www.canonrumors.com/
     
  8. macrumors 68040

    Designer Dale

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Location:
    Folding space
    #8
    Here's the DPreview write-up on the 60d.

    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos60D

    I didn't mean to imply that it's not a good camera, it is.

    Dale
     
  9. macrumors newbie

    hsuthard

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Location:
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    #9
    If you can substitute the 50mm 1.4 for the 1.8 you'll have a much nicer lens, the build quality of the 1.4 is fantastic for the price.

    I agree the lenses should be the determining factor, moreso than the body. Both of those are great choices.
     
  10. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Location:
    UK
    #10
    I'd just add that while the 70-200mm is a brilliant lens I'd be tempted to wait and get the IS version. Also - bear in mind it attracts a lot of attention and if it was my only lens I would probably often end up taking a little point and shoot when taking the camera to social functions etc instead. You always seem to end talking with people about the camera rather than just taking pics :rolleyes:.

    I'm on a crop and my most used lens is the EF-S 17-55, although I'm really liking the new 40mm I've just got.

    I would also suggest waiting a couple of months, I'm currently contemplating a new body - but as the others have said there's talk of the 70d very soon... (Which I might be tempted by or I might look for a better deal on one of existing models ).
     
  11. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    #11
    I'd definitely up for the 70D and hope it comes along very soon. My 20D is really, really starting to show its age. I'll be getting mine in Japan (I hate looking at overpriced camera stuff in Britain), and following pricing trends, I won't get it until about six months after it's been released as that tends to be the period when prices drop and stabilise to a long term norm.
     
  12. ctyhntr, Jan 2, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2013

    macrumors 6502

    ctyhntr

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    #12
    If you're looking to invest, the lenses retain more value over time than the bodies. If I had the 40D package, I can still use that 70-200 f4 lens 5,10 years down the line on a new body.

    Case in point the new t4i was selling for $900 when it first came out just six months ago now I see deals in the $600 range, same as the clearance sales for t2i & t3i.

    The IS version of the 70-200mm is nearly twice the price of the non-IS version, and well over the OP's budget. The 70-200 f4 is a great lens, and a bargain for a L lens. Mount your camera on a tripod, its manual IS. :)

    Judging from your selection, get the 40D package with the 70-200 f4. The lens is the best part of that package. A brand new 70-200 f4 retail for $650, where as the 50mm f1.8 is $110. So, you're paying $640 for the 60D body, and $150 for the 40D body. You can't go wrong with either, but remember both bodies will become obsolete. You can later acquire the 50mm f1.8 either new or used. Heard reports about being fragile, so I suggest getting the 50mm f1.8 new.
     
  13. someoldguy, Jan 2, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2013

    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Location:
    usa
    #13
    Go for the 60D and 50 1.8 and save up for a used or refurb 15-85 as a next lens . There's nothing wrong with the 40D except it's getting a bit long in the tooth . 70-200 is an excellent lens , but maybe isn't the best for a first lens . It's pretty long to use as a walk around lens . The 50 is a whole lot better for a general purpose starter lens even though it equates to 80mm on full frame . If you could swing a 35/2 it might be better , but if you can't , the 50 will do. I'm assuming the 2 bodies/lenses are private sales in your areas , if you miss out on both , remember that the 50D is also a worthwhile body , its got the build of the 40D , 15MP , decent high iso capability , but no articulated screen or video
     
  14. DragonJade, Jan 2, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2013

    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    #14
    The OP says I will probably shoot portraits, landscapes, and maybe some nature shots

    In all honesty as a beginner, you don't really need much beyond 80 or 100mm at most, in my opinion anyway. For portraits the magic number is around 70-75mm (if I remember correctly), and for landscapes you don't generally have to zoom in that much (in my experience). If anything, I like to go as wide as I can to fit as much of the landscape in as possible. I have an old 75-300mm IS (from my 35mm film days) which I only pick up to move out of the way nowadays. It's great for nature shots, but the OP says maybe he'll use it for this.

    I'm not too clued up on recent lenses, but I have a Sigma 18-50mm EX DC. With the x1.6 that's about 28-80mm 2.8. A fantastic lens and still going strong after seven years or so. As someone else mentioned, lenses keep their value and worth. I'm kind of hoping that the 70D doesn't have a full frame sensor as I don't want to deal with the hassle of buying new lenses and selling off the old ones.

    EDIT: Thinking on it, I think 80mm is the magic number for portraits. That would explain why I have a 50mm lens!
     
  15. thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    #15
    Firstly; thank you to all of you who replied so rapidly with lots of information

    @NZed
    The thing is the 60D is cheaper ;)
    @DragonJade
    I am aware that the 60D is running late in its cycle and so then hopefully I can ask the guy for a little discount and I don't mind waiting another week for CES

    @ Designer Dale
    Thanks for the link; I already have read the reviews on both cameras :)

    @hsuthard I wish I get the f/1.4 but it'd be out of my budget and I can maybe upgrade the f/1.8 to the f/1.4 as my 3rd or 4th lens. I am planning on getting the better body because I intend on keeping it for 4 to 5 years so it'd be better for the long term and because I will get better lenses later on; but from reviews I have also seen that the 50mm f/1.8 is a great lens for $100

    @Jeremy. H
    so are you suggesting I get a smaller lens like a 28-135mm to carry around? Would the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 be a nice thing to get with the 40D or a good lens to save for for the 60D's second lens? I would like to get the camera soon and pay $50 extra but I will definitely wait for CES for an announcement

    @DragonJade
    I'm going to wait until CES so I could get a discount on the 40D or 60D but if the 70D is not announced at CES I am going to go ahead and buy the 40D or the 60D

    @ctyhntr
    I am aware of that but I am wondering if a better camera would be better down the road

    @someoldguy
    I was wondering how the 15-85 would be as a second lens for the 60D, care to do a mini review?

    @DragonJade
    Thanks for all the comments! :)
    So you're suggesting the 70-200mm lens is not what's best for me?so know that I know the 50mm is perfect for portraits what should I get for the nature/landscapes and I forgot to mention this earlier; city photography (random stuff if want to photograph in the different parts of Toronto (where I live)
     
  16. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Location:
    PHL
    #16
    I would go with the 60D + 50mm combo. I would then save up for the 17-55mm and 70-200mm that you mentioned. If, however, you plan on going full frame in the future, you would have to sell the 17-55mm since EF-S lenses are compatible with FF camera bodies.
     
  17. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    #17
    There are workarounds for these 'deficiencies', but I'm not a fan of the 60D because it lacks a pc-sync port and the joystick controller.

    The crop sensor body I would get in Canon's current lineup is the 7D.
     
  18. macrumors 68040

    Designer Dale

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Location:
    Folding space
    #18
    It's out of the OPs budget of $800 for camera and lens. A used 7d body is $900.

    Dale
     
  19. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    #19
    To save heartache and dollars both, do not purchase EF-S lenses. Stay with EF lenses which will work with full frame bodies and crop frame bodies as well. I have a 20D, 1DIII, 5DII, and 5DIII along with a dozen Canon lenses. Canon, in my humble opinion, has the finest glass on the market. My AE-1, and A-1 and five Canon lenses convinced me of that long before Canon designed digital bodies.

    http://imaginethatimages.zenfolio.com/
     
  20. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2013
    #20
    sounds like renting will be your best option to experiment.
     
  21. someoldguy, Jan 2, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2013

    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Location:
    usa
    #21
    So , here's my take on the 15-85 . I inherited mine , along with a 50D body 9-10 months back , maybe I've taken 700-1000 shots with it since , mostly landscape-streetscape sort of shots . When I got it my immediate point of comparison was to the 24-105L that I've used for several years on a 5D2 , and previously a 5D.
    The 15-85 equates to 24-135 on full frame , so it's got wide to a short tele capability . Total length roughly 85mm contracted , around 122-123 extended , add another 35 or so with the hood . A bit smaller than the 24-105 , and you pick up another 35mm of reach on the long end . The end of the lens doesn't rotate when zooming so if you've got a polarizer on , the adjustment won't change with zooming .
    The build quality is nearly equal to the 24-105 , except there's no weather sealing . The end of the lens barrel doesn't have a whole lot of slop in it when fully extended , nor does my copy creep when I'm carrying it .
    Balances well on the 50D , might be nose heavy on a Rebel though . USM is fast , full time manual focusing , image stabilizer seems good for a solid 3 stops .
    There's barrel distortion at 15mm , Photoshop ,DPP , PT Lens or similar will deal with it in post , but I'm not sure I'd use the lens for architectural
    photography . If you zoom out a bit , say to 20mm or so, it goes away.
    Maximum aperture goes from 3.5 at 15mm to 5.6 at 85mm . Never found this to be an issue as usually I'm shooting stopped down , f8-f11 or so, in daylight .After dark , or inside there's always the option of flash or bumping up the ISO some , or a tripod and remote release.
    Image quality seems pretty close to the 24-105 . I don't examine pixels at 400% , it's just how the images appear to me on a 30"ACD .
    If you're planning to keep whatever body you get for 4-5 years , these lenses look pretty good for use as a general purpose, walk around lens, especially if you can score a good used one, or a refurb . If you go full frame after that , you can always sell it off with the body.
    PM me if you want some images to check out.
     
  22. thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    #22
    Thanks to everyone again

    I am not worried about full frame yet as I am still just going to do photography as a hobby but i for my second lens and after I will try and go with EF lenses however I am not worried about the 50mm f/1.8 being EF-S because it is only $100 and should be easy to sell if I do plan on going full frame after a few years. As for a 7D like Dale said, its $900 body only, I wouldn't mind upgrading to its successor in a few years after more knowledge, experience, and more passion for photography. I'll probably rent a couple of lenses before I pick my second lens.
    Any more lens recommendations because it seems that I am going to get the 60D (although I will wait for CES for a possible 70D announcement)
    Thanks again everyone! :)

    @SomeOldGuy
    Thanks for the extensive and detailed review of the 15-85mm Lens.
    I'll PM you for a couple of photos of your work with the lens.
    Thanks! :)
     
  23. macrumors 65816

    ijohn.8.80

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Location:
    Adelaide, Oztwaylya.
    #23
    Howdy mac26, you asked my opinion over on photo of the day. I can't really add a huge amount here for you, there's so many good reviews of these items elsewhere, like at:
    • dpreview.com
    • photozone.de
    • cameralabs.com

    I can say that for me personally, the 60D is a lot better than my T3/1100D, and I couldn't warrant the extra price of the 7D either at this point. The 60D & 7D both have the same sensor and many of the same features. I've no need to connect it to any studio lights and I'm not shooting sports so there was no need to go to the 7D for me.

    The 50mm f/1.8 is a full frame lens and a worthy addition considering the price.

    My next lens? Well I had myself set for the 24-105 L, but that's changed! I want a wide lens for architecture, landscapes and interiors. Which to go for? Secondhand here in Australia the 17-40 L can be bought for $600, the 10-22 EF-S can be yours for $550. I know which one I'm leaning towards, especially as one day I'll go full frame! ;)
     
  24. thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    #24
    Thanks for your input and opinion, I really appreciate it! :)
    Also I believe the 50mm f/1.8 is a EF-S lens so it isn't compatible with the EF mount on Full frame cameras.
     
  25. macrumors 65816

    ijohn.8.80

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Location:
    Adelaide, Oztwaylya.
    #25
    You're welcome.

    According to Canon Australia it is EF. Mine says EF also.
     

Share This Page