Carriers Quiet on Prospects for FaceTime Over Cellular Networks with iOS 6

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jun 19, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    As part of its iOS 6 preview at last week's Worldwide Developers Conference, Apple announced that it would officially be bringing its FaceTime video calling feature to cellular networks, significantly expanding the usability of the feature for users on the go.
    But as with other carrier-dependent features like tethering and personal hotspot, FaceTime could still find itself subject to limitations imposed by the carriers.

    [​IMG]


    MarketWatch takes a look at the impact of FaceTime over cellular, noting that it could soak up significant amounts of cellular bandwidth just as carriers are moving to refocus their service plans to emphasize data usage over calling minutes. But so far the carriers are silent on how and even whether they will support FaceTime on their networks.
    The report notes that with customers being shifted to tiered data plans on most carriers, carrier concerns over FaceTime usage may be lessened, but it still remains to be seen just how they will handle the new functionality and how it will impact their networks.

    Apple's small-print footnotes on FaceTime in iOS 6 mention only that "carrier data charges may apply", making no disclaimer that the feature could be not supported at all by certain carriers. And with FaceTime over cellular networks working under the iOS 6 beta, it seems likely that carriers will support the feature and simply rely on customers' data caps to keep usage in check or increase revenue through higher-cost plans.

    Article Link: Carriers Quiet on Prospects for FaceTime Over Cellular Networks with iOS 6
     
  2. macrumors P6

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #2
    Of course they're quiet. They're in the back room giggling over the amount of money coming in from people that have caps.
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Location:
    Miami Beach
    #3
    I never understood this policy by Apple not to allow FaceTime when not connected to a WiFi network. Skype video and voice works flawless on the iPhone over 3G.
     
  4. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Location:
    Champaign, IL
    #4
    "limitations imposed by the carriers" :mad:

    Cellular carriers have to be pushed a little by the Congress... too much power they have!
     
  5. macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #5
    Making facetime work for everyone will need a huge investment from carriers. Probably means price increases for all customers (regardless of their facetime usage)
     
  6. macrumors 601

    BornAgainMac

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Location:
    Florida Resident
    #6
    The unlimited plans was most likely the reason they never allowed it in the first place. Now they can make money from it. I don't know what Sprint will do.
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2011
    #7
    Verizon's new plans removes the concern for these kinds of things since it puts a premium on data usage.

    The carriers will find a way (or loophole) that will force customers into these new plans.
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    foodog

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #8
    Exactly... Hopefully the pre-paid carriers can help provide the desired pressure. Congress can only screw up stuff... money makes companies modify their behavior much better.
     
  9. macrumors 68000

    hitekalex

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Location:
    Chicago, USA
    #9
    Huh? "Huge investment" for what exactly? FaceTime uses data bandwidth, just like any other VoIP app, like Skype. I use FaceTime over cellular data on my jailbroken iPhone - it runs just fine.
     
  10. CIA
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    #10
    Of course carriers are mum. Facetime uses a lot of data. With less and less people on unlimited data plans every day that's going to be a cash cow for them!

    Then again, not a lot of people use facetime...
     
  11. macrumors 68030

    Amazing Iceman

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Location:
    Florida, U.S.A.
    #11
    What's the big deal with FaceTime, what does it do more in the sense of putting a load on carriers, that Skype, ooVoo, Tango and others don't do?

    What's the big deal about blocking FaceTime??? Just let it be. Not having it available over 3G just makes no sense.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #12
    I think since we all know about this feature, this should be okay to mention... but I (legally) installed iOS 6 onto my iPhone before heading out on a trip to Kansas City. It was awesome to be able to be at a Royals game and have a FaceTime conversation with my dad without having to find a WiFi signal. Now I wasn't going to show him the whole game, but I called him via FaceTime and started chatting with him, showing him the game from my vantage point. It was really cool. Granted there probably were some public WiFi spots (we were in the suites level) but the ability to have this capability from anywhere is just great and what it should have been all along.

    I'm on AT&T, and if they think about hampering this I will lose it. Personal Hotspot is one thing, but this is ridiculous. There are a multitude of other apps out there that can do video chat over cellular data. Plus, I'm paying you for the data, why do you even care if I blow through it in no time?
     
  13. macrumors 68030

    Amazing Iceman

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Location:
    Florida, U.S.A.
    #13
    More than Skype, ooVoo and Tango?

    The ooVoo app allows for multiple web conferences simultaneously. I would imagine it would be a much bigger bandwidth hog than FaceTime...
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    #14
    It's sad - you'll get one FaceTime call per month over cellular because of the data caps imposed by cell providers. Patiently waiting the day where somebody lays the smack down on AT&T, Verizon, and the rest.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    #15
    American carriers are a joke.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 18, 2012
    Location:
    far away from an Apple store
    #16
    I can Google Hang-out on cellular. Can't see a reason why I can't face-time someone...
     
  17. macrumors 68040

    neiltc13

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    #17
    I think with most of the carriers now offering 1GB as standard on the higher end plans (and on many iPhone plans) this shouldn't really be an issue. I mean, there's not that many situations where you'd be without WiFi but needing to make a video call.

    Some of the carriers are more relaxed than others as well, I think T-Mobile is quite lenient when people go over their cap. Plus my friend called them and said he wanted data included in his plan (he pays £7 per month I think) and they gave him 500MB per month for free.
     
  18. macrumors 68030

    CrAkD

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #18
    Please they've capped all new users and throttled unlimited users they have us coming and going a new way for customers to eat up allotted data is just dollar signs to the carriers.
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    oneMadRssn

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #19
    I can't find exact numbers, but I presume there are far far far more people that have facetime preinstalled (and therefore likely to use it) than those who specifically installed one of the alternatives.

    You're one user. Now multiply that by millions.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    #20
    Standard operating procedure for Apple. If they’re not confident the quality is up to par they won’t release … well most of the time there are of course exceptions to the rule. Counter to your experience I find Skype to be rather unreliable over cellular or WiFi, iOS or OS X. I get lots of dropped connections, audio drop-outs, in video I get noticeable delays. FaceTime on the other hand is indeed flawless. I have weekly chats with friends around the country and unlike any other option we’ve tried you completely forget you’re using technology with FaceTime.

    I’m hoping for audio only FaceTime in the near future as the video call quality is orders of magnitude more reliable and high fidelity that the phone app.
     
  21. macrumors 68000

    hitekalex

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Location:
    Chicago, USA
    #21
    I have never heard of anyone using ooVoo or Tango, but Skype is very widely used on iOS devices. And it uses comparable amount of bandwidth as FaceTime.

    I don't see FaceTime every becoming a major factor, as it's limited to Apple devices.. And it doesn't integrate with PSTN. Which makes it more or less useless as a true replacement for traditional voice.

    While allowing FaceTime over cell data is a nice step forward, it's pretty insignificant in a grand scheme of things.


    "Millions" aren't waiting to start using FaceTime over carrier networks. FaceTime is just another communications app amongst many.
     
  22. macrumors member

    LeGacY X

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Location:
    VA, USA
    #22
    Gonna go out on a limb and say this won't be available at launch on AT&T:(
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #23
    Clearly not informed about the Canadian carriers.
     
  24. macrumors 65816

    Simplicated

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Location:
    Waterloo, ON
    #24
    And perhaps when it's available, it will require an extra $20 subscription fee and usage counts against your bandwidth. Now that's typical AT&T.
     
  25. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    #25
    FaceTime over 3G/cellular was enabled in iOS 5. This is just apple tryig to find an excuse for a 10th "major" feature.
     

Share This Page