stcanard said:Not a single Bond film in history has actually been based on the book it was named after.
Mav451 said:Uh since when did Denzel measure 4ft? He's listed at 6ft http://www.tiscali.co.uk/entertainment/film/biographies/denzel_washington_biog.html. I am pretty shocked at the response you two guys are having (the general assumption that you are white).
And I am sorry, but the "4ft" comment is blatantly racist. There is no denying it.
Yes, it is obvious the Bond franchise is built on the "tall, dominant white man", but that does not give you an excuse to shoot off racist comments. How would you like it if I accused you of being "4ft" and "old and balding"?
God I hope not, I'd spend the whole film wanting to puch Bond in the face!patseguin said:What about Colin Ferrel (sp?)?
No problem...now Just glad I wasn't around to see the post at the time, I would have gone bonkers!!!!!!Mav451 said:Anyway, I'm sorry to edesignuk if it looked like I was in anyway libeling you.
patseguin said:What about Colin Ferrel (sp?)?
I totally agree with you, it's a good sign. Goldfinger is my favorite Bond of all time and Goldeneye is easily my favorite of all the modern Bond movies (probably the best since For Your Eyes Only or possibly Octopussy IMHO). So the formula is simple...find us another Bond property with the word "Gold" in it and it'll be great!Laslo Panaflex said:In my opinion the last great bond movie was Goldeneye, so it's good to see that the same director is going to head up Casino Royale.
Read? No. Seen the original? Yes. It was horrible. Horrible. Started out ok, but just kept getting worse. The end was just rediculous, even if it was supposed to be comedic.SiliconAddict said:I've got mixed feeling about this. Has anyone actually read Casino Royale?
stcanard said:Not a single Bond film in history has actually been based on the book it was named after.
I expect this one to be no different.
Abstract said:We need a Chinese James Bond!!
virividox said:yeah im sorry a black bond just wont do. 20 movies with white bonds...chaging a the formula now would be stupid
aloofman said:Maybe they could use the "Casino Royale" story and give it a different title, like the vague names the recent ones have had.
rkphoto said:Alright I've heard all the rumors about who's going to be the next Bond and the answer seems like a no brainer to me- Hugh Grant. Who better to play the smarmy, middle aged yet eternally young British agent.
You want to get rid of the eye-candy and replace it with dialogue, and a story...Diatribe said:Clive Owen all the way.
I think he'd make an awesome Brosnan replacement. Now if they could get the movies to not suck anymore I'd be a happy camper.
Sun Baked said:You want to get rid of the eye-candy and replace it with dialogue, and a story...
That would almost be as bad as putting realistic FX into a movie, people wouldn't know what they were watching.
The dialogue and minimal plot is only there to fade you into the next explosion and fight scene.