'Confide' is Like Snapchat for Text Messages

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jan 9, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    With the image-based Snapchat reaching huge levels of popularity with its ephemeral image and video messaging, new app Confide looks to offer the same type of secure, self-destructing messaging for text.

    The app allows users to send messages to anyone with an email address -- prompting those users to download the app -- and conceals the contents of messages until they swipe to select it. It also alerts senders when screenshots are attempted and sends read receipt messages so senders know when their message is read.

    The company is pitching Confide as an app for business executives and others to send messages to each other that they would prefer HR or legal departments not find out about.

    Gigaom writes:
    [​IMG]
    Confide for iPhone is a free download from the App Store. [Direct Link]

    Article Link: 'Confide' is Like Snapchat for Text Messages
     
  2. macrumors 68040

    Goldfrapp

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
    #2
    Record the secret message with another iPhone's video camera. :D
     
  3. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    Canada
    #3
    Exactly what I was thinking. :p
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    ck2875

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Location:
    Brighton
    #4
    So they basically put orange lipstick on Snapchat and called it business-class?
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    #5
    So.... Snapchat?
     
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    #6
    The difference is Snapchat has the potential to be funny with photographic creativity...
    Ooh, risqué words. How edgy.
     
  7. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    #7
    1. Confide releases an app with ephemeral text messages
    2. Confide gains mild popularity
    3. Snapchat adds support for ephemeral text messages
    4. Confide goes away

    I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE

    Never start a company oriented around trying to fill a minor gap in a competing product. It doesn't work out.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Location:
    Baltimore
    #8
    If you assume that the receipt is a non a trustworthy party, the communication can never be secure.

    This is the fundamental idea. When we talk about secure communications between two or more parties we assume that the parties are trustworthy and look for other issues; whether issues in the channel, side channel, eavesdropping, etc. The only point of this app is to basically get some marketshare by marketing on GigaOm and MacRumors and making the money they do not deserve to. It's simple.
     
  9. macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
  10. arn
    macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #10
    It's not really about trust. Some things you might not want logged.

    Here's the use cases listed on the site:

     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    Nunyabinez

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Location:
    Provo, UT
    #11
    Here's some use cases that we were probably all thinking about, but that wouldn't be prudent to market.

    You don't want your wife/girlfriend/husband/boyfriend seeing the texts from your girlfriend/boyfriend

    Or maybe you don't want the police coming to find you when your drug dealer gets pinched.

    :eek:
     
  12. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Location:
    Baltimore
    #12
    Umm. My comment was not about logging or self-destruct or meta-tagged messages. It was about the 2nd party or the recipient being the entity that may create issues.

    I don't want anything at all to be logged but my comment wasn't about logging. It was about trusting the 2nd party. If you cannot trust the receipt, then there is no question of a secure communication.
     
  13. macrumors regular

    Sardonick007

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    #13
    Wonderful, another app to increase the disconnect between parents and children. Could care less how adults use, they can fend for their own security and responsibility.
     
  14. macrumors 604

    bushido

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #14
    hate to admit but i did that a couple of times with snapchat :D:eek:
     
  15. macrumors G3

    Kilamite

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    #15
    It's a way to automatically delete confidential messages rather than leaving it up to the users to do it in enterprise environments etc. You know, computers are meant to make our lives easier by assisting us in our work?

    Option 1. All messages are logged. Users have to manually delete messages.
    Option 2. No messages are logged. Messages are automatically deleted without requiring user intervention.

    Option 2 is a better solution for the things Arn mentioned (e.g. HR issues at work). It's not if the 2nd party shares the information but more their stupidity if they forget to delete a confidential message and their account gets hacked or they leave their message client open unattended for someone to snoop in and read.
     
  16. macrumors 65816

    citi

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Location:
    Simi Valley, CA
    #16
    Not sure what this app does to increase the disconect. You don't need a self destructing text message app to have your child keep things from you. I'm pretty sure you are not with them 24/7 so things that happen at school don't come back to you to. Do you want to ban school?
     
  17. macrumors 68030

    zorinlynx

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Location:
    Florida, USA
    #17
    It doesn't matter how many of these apps come about.

    There will never be a way to send messages over the net that cannot be logged somehow. Period.

    If what you're going to say can be damaging if it gets to people who shouldn't have it, the only current solution is to discuss it in person. And even in that case, the room could be bugged, or the person you're talking to can betray you and have a wire on him.
     
  18. macrumors regular

    dwhittington

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #18
    So if you find this on your spouse's phone ...

    ... they are planning a surprise party for your birthday.
     
  19. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Location:
    Baltimore
    #19
    Wow, I can't believe two different people have misread/misunderstood my comment. Did I write something wrong?

    I have nothing against auto-prune; it is great. It is something I'd been imagining myself but I don't more resources to invest in a startup so I let it go. I am not talking about self-destructive messages or conversations. I am referring to the gimmick and a totally wrong foundation that they have built their features on. Protecting against screenshots is something that cannot be done. There is video, etc. This shows that their philosophy and vision is lacking in the sense that they somehow assumed the receipt to be an adversary which is a very bad assumption. This is what I am talking about.
     
  20. arn
    macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #20
    But it doesn't matter. Putting some protection against screenshots is just an added casual deterrent. It's silly to argue the "if it can't be done 100%, it shouldn't be done". It's like saying why put a lock on a house if it has windows -- since you can easily break the window and get in. It still serves a purpose.

    arn
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    #21
    So, with the pervasive problem of spam and phishing, we can expect scammers to re-target their "you have a message" spams at Confide - both masquerading their spam to look like a Confide alert ("click here to download the app; hold tight while we route you through porn sites"), and to annoy people through by randomly targeting their addresses through Confide itself, being able to find out that/when you read it.

    I hope they will have a Facebook-style "do not ever send me invitations to join" option. Although they could go one better and make it actually work.
     
  22. macrumors 68020

    jclardy

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    #22
    Yes, shady business executives, send all your private insider trading information through our app. It is secure, we promise ;)
     
  23. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    #23
    Also know as the death threat app.
     
  24. macrumors 604

    Jessica Lares

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2009
    Location:
    Near Dallas, Texas, USA
    #24
    Couldn't someone just open Confide on your phone when you're not looking and look through the messages?

    Serious question here...

    If nobody knows that you use Yahoo Mail/Twitter/Snapchat, is it going to be a place where they look through your communications when the moment arises?
     
  25. macrumors G3

    Kilamite

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    #25
    They could. But this is just a way to take out the user required process of deleting confidential stuff.
     

Share This Page