Consumer Reports Finds U.S. Cell-Phone Service Providers Lacking

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Dec 1, 2009.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]

    Consumer Reports today released its most recent survey of more than 50,000 readers that found only 54 percent of respondents were completely or very satisfied with their cell-phone service (regardless of network). In a press release Consumer Reports notes that despite “smarter phones,” more flexible plans, and faster wireless networks, cell service continues to be among the lower-rated of all the services that they evaluate.

    The survey also showed that almost two-thirds of respondents had at least one major complaint. About one in five readers cited high prices as their top complaint, which is more than any other annoyance.

    “America is in love with the cell phone, but they are lukewarm about cell phone-phone service,” said Paul Reynolds, Electronics Editor at Consumer Reports. "They’re especially concerned about its cost in these tight economic times.”

    AT&T was the lowest-rated cell-phone service provider and received low marks in voice service and customer support. Verizon was the top-rated carrier and handily beat AT&T in all areas surveyed.

    The full report is included in Consumer Reports January 2010 issue and is posted on their website. A city-by-city rating is available for 26 metropolitan areas. Also included in the January 2010 issue is an update to the organization's cell phone ratings. Apple's iPhone models continue to remain on top of Consumer Reports smart phone ratings as of this posting.

    Article Link: Consumer Reports Finds U.S. Cell-Phone Service Providers Lacking
     
  2. macrumors 65816

    amac4me

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    #2
    Please let there be truth to the reports that the iPhone-AT&T exclusivity will end in 2010!!
     
  3. macrumors 601

    goobot

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Location:
    long island NY
    #3
    no


    and version sucks where i live:p
     
  4. macrumors 65816

    zombitronic

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    #4
    In other news, the sky is blue.
     
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Location:
    California
    #5
  6. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    #6
    here

    here you go

    I believe the findings to be factual.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. macrumors 68040

    DakotaGuy

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    South Dakota, USA
    #7
    Verizon gets the very top score in voice connection and quality and AT&T gets the lowest however some still try to argue that AT&T's GSM network is somehow superior to Verizon's CDMA network.
     
  8. macrumors 601

    DMann

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Location:
    10023
    #8
    Nevertheless,

    Despite AT&T's lower ranking :

    "The Consumer Reports survey found that iPhone owners are willing to put up
    with a creaky network just to have the device: The survey found that 98
    percent
    of iPhone owners liked their phones enough to buy it again, despite
    the sub-par ratings for AT&T."


    To be willing to tolerate a sub-par network for the sake of using an iPhone speaks volumes, in regard to customer satisfaction.
     
  9. macrumors G3

    puckhead193

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Location:
    NY
    #9
    way to go big V... (hopefully my stock will go up tomorrow :p)
    Imagine the perfect phone on america's perfect network :D
     
  10. Administrator

    Doctor Q

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #10
    Same story for me

    I had better sound quality with Verizon and I was happy with Verizon service. But AT&T had iPhones! So I'm an AT&T customer.
     
  11. macrumors 65816

    stagi

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    #11
    I am somewhat satisfied with the performance just not happy about paying $200 a month for 2 iPhones, wish the price would start to go down a bit.
     
  12. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    #12
    Geez AT&T sucks! However, I fall into the camp of "AT&T sucks, but not bad enough that I will abandon my iPhone".
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2005
    Location:
    California
    #13
    Not sure how true this is, since I have read many times that Sprint can roam on VZW towers and even on some phones force roaming so you are like always on VZW towers(sprint doesn't charge roaming fees so its all good). So, if Sprint can roam on VZW service when needed, then shouldn't Sprint be up there in reception and call quality?
     
  14. macrumors 68040

    synth3tik

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    #14
    I think I may be one of the only people who doesn't mind AT&T, but absolutely hate the iPhone.
     
  15. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    #15
    In Portland, OR, I have never had a dropped call on AT&T with my iPhone. However, it wouldn't take very many dropped calls to get me upset with AT&T. I want what I pay for. I feel extremely lucky that I get what I pay for.
     
  16. macrumors 68000

    spazzcat

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    #16
    This is like saying its dark at night.
     
  17. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Location:
    The Desert
    #17
    I put up with AT&T in order to have the iPhone, but the second the iPhone is opened up to other carriers, I am gone.
     
  18. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Location:
    Laurel, MD, USA
    #18
    Whoa, there, buddy. No one was insinuating that. The point I got out of the article was that they all suck, it's just that Verizon sucks slightly less.

    Alas, that puts me in that group mentioned at the end of the article. I don't like AT&T, but I'm not gonna get rid of my iPhone for a slightly less crappy network.
     
  19. macrumors 601

    Yvan256

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Location:
    Canada
    #19
    If they think that's bad

    They should come and see the contracts and the fees in Canada. :(
     
  20. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    #20
    Agreed. The difference between reader scores is only 9% and Verizon's 75% satisfaction rate is far from perfect.
     
  21. macrumors 603

    kas23

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    #21
    I'm sick of AT&T. I get about 1 dropped call per day on average. Can someone post the city-by-city results from CR?
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Location:
    Rocky Face, GA
    #22
    I just wish that they would come up with some sort of low minute usage, but high data usage plan, then I would be happy. As it stands I am paying almost $100 a month for 78 minutes of usage on Verizon's network. I have unlimited data, unlimited GPS, unlimited "in" texting.
     
  23. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    #23
    I hardly use my iPhone as a phone because I have so many dropped calls. I bet iPhone on VZ end of summer 2010.
     
  24. macrumors demi-god

    kdarling

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Location:
    Device engineer 30+ yrs, touchscreens 24+.
    #24
    I thought that Sprint cannot do 3G roaming on Verizon (?)

    If they could, I'd get my wife on Sprint in a heartbeat. Least expensive all-in-one plans and nice choice of phones. My son-in-law has a Pre on Sprint and loves it.
     
  25. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    #25
    AT&T must be raking in cash from iPhone subscriptions, right? So you'd think their network would be top notch… :confused:
     

Share This Page