Copyright bill poses threat to iPod's future

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jul 6, 2004.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Location:
    Tampa
    #2
    This bill is an absolute travesty.

    But I'm unsure of who would sue Apple. Certainly not the RIAA. How could they approve of legal download services and then turn around and sue Apple for offering a product with which you could listen to your legally downloaded music. And what does the number of songs the thing can hold have to do with anything. They don't send it to you with 10,000 illegal songs on it. It's just a hard drive. Any hard drive can hold music.

    I know the implications of this bill apply to more than just Apple, but I just don't understand how this can be.

    One of these days someone is going to sue me for hearing a song on the radio, not buying it, and singing it to myself in the shower. How dare I.

    Matt
     
  3. macrumors G3

    Chip NoVaMac

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2003
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    #3
    Just goes to show that what was said about politicians not reading the bills before them is true.
     
  4. macrumors 68040

    shamino

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Location:
    Purcellville, VA
    #4
    What makes you think they were unaware of this potential for abuse?

    Lots of polititians are in bed with trial lawyers. Many of them, in fact, are trial lawyers. I could easily see them favoring any law that gives big corporations carte blanche to sue everybody under the sun.
     
  5. macrumors 68040

    shamino

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Location:
    Purcellville, VA
    #5
    The EFF has a fake complaint that spells out very clearly how all kinds of people can be sued under this law.

    Until now, there is no restriction on someone making a device that could be used for piracy, as long as there are "substantial non-infringing uses" as well. Which is why VCRs, cassette recorders, CD-RW drives, etc. are all legal. Under this bill, however, that all gets thrown out the window - if you make a device that has the potential to be used for priacy, you will be liable for any acts of piracy that others perform with it.

    This effectively gives a copyright owner the right to sue just about anybody. Anyone making a recording device of any kind can be sued because the device can be used to record copyrighted material. Your cell phone manufacturer can be sued because you can place a call during a concert and let another person listen for free. A ball-point pen manufacturer can be sued because you can write down a song's lyrics. Cable-modem manufacturers can be sued because lots of people use their broadband connections to pirate stuff.

    Maybe courts will throw out most of these suits as frivolous, but the cost of defense against these suits can be enough to drive small companies out of business and make big companies think real hard before introducing new products.
     
  6. macrumors 68020

    mainstreetmark

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    Saint Augustine, FL
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Location:
    Lawrence, KS
    #7
    This sounds completely ridiculous.
    What if thousands of people started robbing banks and used Ferraris as the getaway cars? Would this make Ferrari liable for assisting in the getaway? I mean, come on!
     
  8. macrumors 68040

    shamino

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Location:
    Purcellville, VA
    #8
    Yes. Completely ridiculous.

    And might become the law of the land if we're not careful.
     
  9. macrumors 68000

    slipper

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    #9
    have we all forgot about iTunes?

    in the event that P2P networks get shut down, i feel iPods will need to open up to WMA formats also.
     

Share This Page