Core Image Hardware reqs not changed

Discussion in 'Games' started by Lord Blackadder, Apr 13, 2005.

  1. Lord Blackadder macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #1
    I know some people were (like myself) wondering just what the hardware requirements for Core Image will be, especially since earlier versions of the Tiger web page on Apple's site excluded the Radeon 9200 from the supported list.

    As you can see, things haven't changed despite the announcement that Tiger has gone gold master. Other than listing the new X800 card and not listing the (presumably supported) 9800 Pro and 9600 Pro, the stated video card requirements remain unchanged. So it looks like the Mini, eMac, and iBook will not fully support Core Image for the time being.

    My prediction: the three systems with the 9200 will be bumped to the GeForce/Go5200 at the next update (not that I'm taking a big risk with that guess - we all know of Apple's love affair with the much-maligned 5200! :rolleyes: :p )
     
  2. Daveway macrumors 68040

    Daveway

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Location:
    New Orleans / Lafayette, La
    #2
    My belief is that Apple wasn't going to scale back visual effect in Tiger to support an audience that probably wouldn't care about it in the first place. I doubt some entry level users will care if the "ripple" effect is missing.

    Do you get what I'm getting at?
     
  3. benpatient macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    #3
    I have to wonder how this can be considered anything other than false advertising.

    This bunch of dribble has been carried over into the official Tiger graphics page...it's left over from Panther promo material, and it's less true now than it was then...and I remember it getting pretty well blasted then.

    The best part is the picture next to the paragraph of Doom 3.

    I guess maybe they mean that no other platform can make such a high-powered processor/graphics combo actually perform as badly as OS X, and thus it's "unmatched"?

    I'm trying to figure out how they think anyone believes that crap.

    OS X has so much going for it that they shouldn't be lying about what it doesn't have going for it right now.
     
  4. James Philp macrumors 65816

    James Philp

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Location:
    Oxford/London
    #4
    I agree

    For such an amazingly specced system, the top-end G5's can't compete in gaming. Maybe it is something to do with this?
    We should also remember that you can buys top-end PC units (that I can only imagine people use for games) that come in at higher prices than the G5. (Maybe not if you have equivalent RAM though!)
     
  5. jim. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Location:
    C-ville, VA
    #5
    I thought that I saw the 9600 Mobility on the original list. Now it isn't there anymore. Maybe I was hallucinating. Was anyone else smoking what I was?

    Jim
     
  6. GFLPraxis macrumors 604

    GFLPraxis

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    #6
    OS X blows away everything except Windows in gaming, though. FreeBSD and Linux are blown away :p

    And BTW, Tiger gets much higher Doom 3 scores.
     
  7. andrewfee macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    #7
    From what I understand, the "full" CoreImage relies on Pixel Shaders, so if the card doesn't have them it won't support it full stop. I don't know what version is required; likely 1.4, as 1.3 was quite a limited in comparison.

    So if your card has pixel shaders, I'd say it's likely that the full CoreImage will work on it, if not, then there's no chance of support being added.
     
  8. Soulstorm macrumors 68000

    Soulstorm

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    #8
    How do you know that? Have you run Tiger with Doom 3??
     
  9. unfaded macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #9
    Other people have and have posted the results. Many places.
     
  10. Hydra macrumors regular

    Hydra

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Location:
    Finland
    #10
    R9200 has 1.4, anyway seems like 2.0 is the requirement.
     
  11. Lord Blackadder thread starter macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #11
    I remember reading that somewhere too, and I think Hydra is correct on 2.0 being the required version. I'm curious to see just what effect Core Image has on general system performance - it seems to have a lot of potential.
     
  12. eXan macrumors 601

    eXan

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Location:
    Russia
    #12
    Well, looks like my GeForce 2 MX will not support Core Image. Time for G5 iMac!

    Parents, please give me 17" SuperDrive model with 160 gig HD and 1 gig RAM! :D :D :D
     
  13. GroundLoop macrumors 68000

    GroundLoop

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    #13

    You are correct. That card was on the original list of supported video cards and didn't make the announcement list. I am just as pissed as you because my PowerBook (which is less than a year old) will not fully support Core Image. Oh well. There isn't much that I can do about that though.

    Hickman
     
  14. jim. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Location:
    C-ville, VA
    #14
    Actually I'm pretty sure it is supported. Those cards listed on the page aren't exclusive at all. There are supported cards that aren't listed. People have been calling Apple about their unlisted cards, and Apple has said that they were supported (see the Tiger release thread).

    BlackAdder: CoreImage will NOT affect everyday performance of the UI. It is an API designed to help programmers add graphical effects and transforms to their programs. For the most part it is going to be utilized in image and video editing software. Maybe some people will add a little eyecandy here and there with it, but it probably wouldn't be smart if they want more than a couple of users to try their program.

    I think you will be more impressed and happy with Quartz 2D Extreme, which promises to greatly speed up the UI, especially with cards that have more VRAM to store the textures.

    Jim
     
  15. devman macrumors 65816

    devman

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    AU
    #15
  16. Lord Blackadder thread starter macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #16
    Thanks for the link, devman.

    I'm positive the 9600 will be supported.
     
  17. benpatient macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    #17
    by the end of the year, the next generation ATI and nVidia cards will be released for the PC.

    ATI's R520 preliminary specs from a guy who posted on a tech site yesterday and who supposedly has first-hand knowledge of the product:

    24 "Pipelines"
    32 Texture Units
    96 Arithmetic Logic Units (ALU)
    192 Shader Operations per Cycle
    700MHz Core
    134.4 Billion Shader Operations per Second (at 700MHz)
    256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR3 Memory
    57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz)
    300-350 Million Transistors
    90nm Manufacturing
    Shader Model 3.0
    ATI HyperMemory
    ATI Multi Rendering Technology (AMR)
    Launch: Q2 2005
    Performance: Over 3x Radeon X800 XT (for single R520)
    16x stochastic FSAA
    FP32 blending, texturing
    Programmable Primitive Processor/Tesselator


    Yes, that is insane. Will Apple still be shipping new PowerMacs with 64mb 5200 cards in them when the first 60GB/Sec memory-bandwidth cards are released? The mac 5200 Ultra does about 2.5 GB/second, buy the way.

    wouldn't be surprised.

    Insane. Looks like I'm going to have to upgrade again...*sigh*

    I hope these numbers aren't faked. A couple of those technologies haven't even been in the rumors until yesterday, because nobody had heard of them being used in this chip.

    Sorry to all of you who just bought a 6800 Ultra for 600 dollars...3x the performance possibly as early as this summer...and they will probably charge 500 dollars for it.

    I'll settle for the mid-range version that's only 2x the speed of a 6800 Ultra and 250 dollars.

    :)
     
  18. GFLPraxis macrumors 604

    GFLPraxis

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    #18
    Nope, according to rumors the next PowerMacs (the low end) will all get Radeon 9600's, as will the iMacs and eMacs...

    The eMac one will be 64 MB, the others 128 MB.
    Hope so.
     
  19. ccool2ax macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    #19
    Mob9600 willbe supported.

    If my 12 incher's go5200 is, the mob9600 is
     
  20. Val-kyrie macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2005
    #20
    Core Image Hardware Reqs ARE Changed!!!

    :confused: The 9600 and 9600 Mobility are not listed! Although it would be logical that the 9800 Pro and 9600 Pro should be supported--I believe both support DirectX 9--I am uncertain why they are not listed unless it is an Apple oversight. Apple is going to have a very large problem if the 9600 does not fully support Core Image (only the 9600 XT is included in Apple's list), especially if the rumored upgrades to the PMacs, iMacs, and eMacs are true--all but the high end PMac is slated for the 9600! However, on this basis, it appears more likely that 9600 does fully support Core Image. Perhaps Apple intended us to understand 9600 (and 9600) XT. But this still leaves the Mobility card in the dark. Anyway, I am not buying until there is an updated iBook that supports Tiger.
     
  21. GFLPraxis macrumors 604

    GFLPraxis

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    #21

    Why does DirectX 9 support matter when the OS does not support DirectX? :confused:
     
  22. eXan macrumors 601

    eXan

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Location:
    Russia
    #22
    I want PowerMac G5 Dual 2.7 GHz + that card!!!!!!! :D
     
  23. GFLPraxis macrumors 604

    GFLPraxis

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    #23
    I want a PowerMac G5 Dual Dual Core 2.7 GHz (aka Quad :D ) + that card!!!! ;)
     
  24. Lord Blackadder thread starter macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #24
    The 9600 Pro and 9600XT only differ in speed; their hardware is essentially the same and if the XT is supported the Pro version must be as well.
     
  25. AppleMatt macrumors 68000

    AppleMatt

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Location:
    UK
    #25
    Because DirectX 9 support = Pixel Shaders 2.0

    AppleMatt
     

Share This Page